Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 02-06-2017 02:07, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 2/06/2017 7:28 am, smitra wrote: On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: Non-locality is not removed in MWI as you appear to believe. For me the abandon of the collapse is the solution of the EPR

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 2/06/2017 12:00 pm, smitra wrote: On 02-06-2017 02:07, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 2/06/2017 7:28 am, smitra wrote: On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: Non-locality is not removed in MWI as you appear to believe. For me the abandon of the

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 1/06/2017 10:19 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: I get your point

​Primordial Black Holes

The January 4 2017 event gives more support to the idea Dark Matter ​is​ ​made of ​ primordial Black Holes born a nanosecond after the Big ​B​ang and were never stars. The spin of one of the Black ​H​ oles is not in the same direction ​as ​ the other ​​ and ​of ​ ​their orbit, binary stars

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 2/06/2017 7:28 am, smitra wrote: On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: Non-locality is not removed in MWI as you appear to believe. For me the abandon of the collapse is the solution of the EPR "paradox", and Aspect experience is somehow the

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 1/06/2017 10:52 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 13:02, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 8:21 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote: >> On 5/30/2017 7:30 PM, Pierz wrote: >>> Thanks for these

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: I get your point with decoherence. Again, I would say that it all

Re: Answers to David 4

On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote: On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 May 2017, at 13:42, David Nyman wrote: On 29 May 2017 at

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 1 June 2017 at 02:59, Bruce Kellett wrote: > On 1/06/2017 6:28 am, David Nyman wrote: > > On 31 May 2017 at 04:55, Bruce Kellett < > bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On 31/05/2017 12:30 pm, Pierz wrote: >> >> Thanks for these

Re: Answers to David 4

On 01 Jun 2017, at 16:42, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 15:20, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 10:02

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote: On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 3:28:18 PM UTC+10, Brent wrote: Sorry. Something funny with my verizon account. Brent On 5/30/2017 8:09 PM, Pierz Newton-John wrote: > Brent, are you replying from a mobile? I’m

Re: Answers to David 4

On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote: > > On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 1/06/2017 8:21 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote: >> On 5/30/2017 7:30 PM, Pierz wrote: >>> Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to be very lucid and helpful - they also confirm

Re: substitution level

On 31 May 2017, at 12:44, Telmo Menezes wrote: Creating a new thread to avoid causing decoherence on the other one :) What if the substitution level turns out to be at a higher level than quantum? E.g. at the level of the neurons and their connections and activations levels? That would

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 31 May 2017, at 20:21, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 18:39, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 17:00, David Nyman wrote: On 30 May 2017 at 14:48, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 14:10, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Tue, May 30,

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 01 Jun 2017, at 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: I get your point with decoherence. Again, I would say that it

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 01 Jun 2017, at 03:59, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 6:28 am, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 04:55, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 31/05/2017 12:30 pm, Pierz wrote: Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to be very lucid and

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 01 Jun 2017, at 13:02, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 1/06/2017 8:21 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote: >> On 5/30/2017 7:30 PM, Pierz wrote: >>> Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to be

Re: Answers to David 4

On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote: On 30 May 2017

LIGO has detected a third Black Hole merger

On January 4 2017 LIGO detected a third Black Hole merger and the most distant one yet, 2.9 billion light years. A 31.2 solar mass Black Hole collided with a 19.4 solar mass Black Hole resulting in a 48.7 solar mass Black Hole with 2 solar masses converted into gravitational wave energy.

Re: Answers to David 4

On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017

Re: Answers to David 4

On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:

Re: Answers to David 4

On 1 Jun 2017 15:20, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote: On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote: