Please don't reply to digests.
1- The Subject is meaningless unless you edit it (see above)
2- It breaks the threading
3- In many cases (though not this time) clueless users quote the entire
digest in order to reply to one message.
Note that you can post via Gmane if you don't want to subscribe
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
completely:
for Evo in particular this means what type of email are you reading?
Local spool? POP/POP3? IMAP? Exchange using the old
evolution-exchange backend? Exchange using
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 01:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
completely:
for Evo in particular this means what type of email are you reading?
Local spool? POP/POP3? IMAP?
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 04:39 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 01:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
completely:
for Evo in particular this means what type of
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
recommend the OP to take a look at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570438 since it's an
LDAP-related problem I reported in February which Srini gave me a
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
recommend the OP to take a look at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570438 since it's an
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:50 -0400, Ben May wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
recommend the OP to take a look at
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
recommend the OP to take a look at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570438 since it's an
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I've seen occasional hangs with 2.26.3
Admittedly I am only using 2.26.1 (with a couple of patches from
subsequent releases) but that's because nothing in any of the bugs that
I have open indicate that a newer version will cure mail
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Description:
Description of problem:
Several times a day evolution freezes, doesn't respond to input or
refresh its window. Generally, if I click on the window decoration to
delete the
Devels know about the bugs I am reporting. I really don't think lack
of bug reporting is the issue here. What appears (granted, from the
outside, so I only have one view) to be at issue here -- and Evolution
is not really any different than most other projects -- is that the
attraction of
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Description:
Description of problem:
Several times a day evolution freezes, doesn't respond to
input or
refresh its window. Generally,
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:00 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Actually, I'm not familiar with apport. Is this an Ubuntu thing?
It is. As you can see in the script though, that that is only required
if you give my script a /var/crash/ file. If you really wanted to, you
could simply remove
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote:
I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution
2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day).
I too have had chronic stability problems with Evolution, namely
evolution-2.26.3 running under
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:10 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote:
I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution
2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day).
I too have had chronic stability
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a
problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the
list.
Well, I did it. Now I feel like an idiot. Briefly the description
is Evolution
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a
problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the
list.
Well, I did it. Now I
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a
problem, and don't just report it here
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:21 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Also, when mentioning a BZ report here on the list it's conventional to
give the bug number (or better, the URL of the BZ page) in case someone
wants to add anything.
Also quite right. It's bug 528393.
19 matches
Mail list logo
