[Exchange] Conversion Failed Exceptions to journaling mailbox.

This isn't a huge deal, I may just put in a transport rule to drop these. They do not need to be retained. But would rather fix it. These are from one sender and go one 8 users. The messages deliver to the users just fine but the journaling messages fail with the below. Every time. There

[Exchange] RE: Recommendation To Not Create Folders Under the Inbox and Use Top Level Folders in Exchange

But children of a folder get the same retention policy right? So if Inbox subfolders are used to 'save' items that is an issue. Have I got that right? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:05

[Exchange] Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 SP3 and Cisco VM

There was an issue with 2010 and the above roll upusers not being able to delete Voice Mail messages sent by Cisco call manager. Is there a fix for it now...is it safe to proceed? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2822208

[Exchange] RE: Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 SP3 and Cisco VM

...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 8:23 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 SP3 and Cisco VM There was an issue with 2010 and the above roll upusers not being able to delete Voice

RE: [Exchange] Random messages rejected by filter service

Sender denied sounds like it is flagging the address. Any filtering still turned on in the Exchange server? What version of Exchange? 2013 has Safelist Aggregation so blocked senders in Outlook would get sync'd to Exchange. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [Exchange] rejecting sender on one domain

'Sender denied' suggests there is a block list or manual block on the full sender address or the domain. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of J- P Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:12 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange]

RE: [Exchange] Determine when an email was marked read

Just because it's marked read doesn't mean they opened it. :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 3:53 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [Exchange] Determine when an email

[Exchange] OoF issues

I'm confused, I thought I had external OoF's blocked. Exchange 2010, Outlook 2010. On the hub transport in Org Configuration. The remote domain tab...the Default * domain I have 'Allow internal out of office messages and legacy out of office messages.(the bottom radio button) checked.

RE: [Exchange] OoF issues

Got it, that is plenty of info for me to find the rest I need on my own. Very much appreciate you pointing me in the right direction. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Adam Farage Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 9:24 PM To:

[Exchange] RE: Quick straw poll: Email size limits

100 MB. Everyone else out there has a lower limit than me. I have never had a problem, and I have never had to debate the issue with my users. It's always your fault. :) Started doing that back at my advertising agency gig. File sizes there are a whole 'nother ball game. From:

[Exchange] RE: EHLO: Released: Exchange Server 2013 Service Pack 1

Tyvm. Awesome news, I am still on 2008 R2 DC's with exch 2010. Now I can get my DC's updated. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:08 PM Subject: [Exchange] EHLO: Released: Exchange Server

[Exchange] RE: change no-reply default message

If there is a mailbox for that address, an auto reply on the mailbox. If no mailbox on that address a transport rule. Don't freak over transport rules if you have never used them. They are glorified outlook rules. Same concept...looks darn near the same as you go through them. And give us

[Exchange] RE: change no-reply default message

...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:32 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.commailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: change no-reply default message

RE: [Exchange] Relaying

On your outgoing mail connector on the general tab. 'specify the fqdn this connector will provide in response to.' From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Steve Ens Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 10:33 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [Exchange] Relaying

...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Steve Ens Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 11:00 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [Exchange] Relaying OK, doesn't let me adjust that from the EMC. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy

RE: [Exchange] Relaying

values: the FQDN of the transport server APTNEXCH.aptn.local, the NetBIOS name of the transport server APTNEXCH, or $null. OK On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Kennedy, Jim

RE: [Exchange] Relaying

If these are because of non-existent accounts, which is usually the cause, turn on recipient filtering. That way your server rejects them during the smtp phase. What you are probably doing now is accepting then realizing they are invalid addresses….and generating the ndr.

[Exchange] RE: Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010

Email AV gateway appliance (vm or physical) (Trend, Barracuda, etc.) Specifically a Cuda. Only one email virus in a decade of using them. I block exe's, password protected zips and the usual suspect file types with it, that certainly helps. From:

RE: [Exchange] RE: Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010

has a signature for it. Mostly, I get these from China (or at least the emails use Chinese character sets.) Kurt On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: Email AV gateway appliance (vm or physical) (Trend, Barracuda, etc.) Specifically a Cuda. Only one

[Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords.

/ A member of the SMP Partners Group of Companies From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: 09 May 2014 14:02 To: exchange Subject: [Exchange] Active Sync and passwords. So we have only allowed

[Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords.

: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: 09 May 2014 14:02 To: exchange Subject: [Exchange] Active Sync and passwords. So we have only allowed a very limited number of devices to use Active Sync

RE: [Exchange] CAS exposure - Exchange 2013 SP1

“A reverse proxy is not wanted…” I have to ask why because in my mind that is the best thing to do in this situation. If they won’t allow access to 443 from the outside to a specific location why have an internet connection? “….and NAT through the firewall to the CAS array is deemed too

RE: [Exchange] CAS exposure - Exchange 2013 SP1

Ok, I have decided that ideas 2 and 3 as I listed them below equally bad. Reverse proxy. From: Kennedy, Jim Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 11:18 AM To: exchange@lists.myITforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] CAS exposure - Exchange 2013 SP1 “A reverse proxy is not wanted…” I have to ask why because

RE: [Exchange] CAS exposure - Exchange 2013 SP1

Thinking out loud. Load balancer out front balancing a group of reverse proxies. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of ccollins9 [ccolli...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 12:34 PM To: exchange Subject:

[Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords.

after he creates a new account. From: Kennedy, Jim Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 9:20 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: Active Sync and passwords. Absolutely. Don't like you are free to use webmail. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords.

Ack, setting that just now disabled currently connected devices. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 9:55 AM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords

RE: [Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords.

So $Devices = Get-ActiveSyncDevice -ResultSize Unlimited $Devices | Foreach-Object{Set-CASMailbox $_.DistinguishedName -ActiveSyncAllowedDeviceIDs @{Add=$_.DeviceId}} Is not liking Apple device names. They all have this odd character as below. iPad§ApplDQTFNEQHDFHW From:

RE: [Exchange] Disabling Forwarding of Meetings

You could make it harder with IRM. Or add a disclaimer to the bottom ‘Anyone forwarding this meeting invite will be fired’ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Adm Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:36 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject:

[Exchange] OWA notifications via reverse proxy.

Publishing my OWA 2010 SP3 RU 5 via a 2012 URL rewrite. No fancy rules on the URL rewrite just straight up publishing of a few fqdn's. I switched from an ISA server to 2012 URL rewrite. Notifications were working prior the changeover. It is the dreaded little bell that says 'Notifications

[Exchange] RE: OWA notifications via reverse proxy.

You know what, this is only a concern when they are internal. I just flipped the dns so internal webmail directly connects. That should be the end of that. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:35 AM

[Exchange] RE: Kaspersky vs McAfee vs Symantec

Barracuda in front of Exchange for email. Strong, well run filter for the internet. Fully patched pc's with EMET and no AV. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Liby Philip Mathew Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 9:16 AM To: Admin Issues

RE: [Exchange] Exchange permissions.

Seldom are there technological solutions for behavioral issues. Beat the helpdesk people into submission. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Paul Cookman Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:11 AM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE:

[Exchange] Chrome showModalDialog depreciation.

Has anyone heard if we should expect a rollup/change for Exchange 2010 to fix the issue with Chrome depreciating showModalDialog? I ask because if it isn’t going to happen I will just train my users now to not use Chrome for OWA. But if there is hope I will push the GPO to turn it back on and

RE: [Exchange] 421 4.2.1 Unable to connect errors

What are the domains? Could be bad bounces from spam to non-existent domains Your server can not contact them, so it tried alternates either in dns or per the RFC’s (for example A record of domain.com) and that failed. So it is still trying. Do an MX lookup from your transport server to

RE: [Exchange] 421 4.2.1 Unable to connect errors

on the mxtoolbox tests. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: What are the domains? Could be bad bounces from spam to non-existent domains Your server can not contact them, so it tried alternates either in dns or per

RE: [Exchange] 421 4.2.1 Unable to connect errors

] 421 4.2.1 Unable to connect errors Sorry Jim, I don't get your answer. The animikisee.cahttp://animikisee.ca domain is the one that won't accept the messages. Is there something awry with the mx record? On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy

[Exchange] RE: Really noob question

2010 servers in my environment? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:24 AM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange] RE: Really noob question You

[Exchange] RE: DNS external records and Testconnectivity

It worked for you before because one of the fallback connection attempts is: https://autodiscover.domain.com/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml Something in your TMG broke that url. Mine has always run that way, no SRV here. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[Exchange] RE: Certificate prompt after upgrading cert to SHA2

No one will know but you. It is a public cert, so no one will need to import it or do anything. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:10 AM To:

RE: [Exchange] Autoresponder for Customer Service

There is no need to have it logged in somewhere forever and Exchange knows when a sender has already received and out of office message from a recipient--this is to prevent the bounce loop The two above sentences are why it does need to be a rule and not an OOF, a customer would email this

[Exchange] RE: Reset Default permissions

For grins, what about a MailboxRepairRequest. http://www.msexchangeblog.nl/2010/10/20/mailbox-repair-exchange-server-2010-sp1/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Miller Bonnie L. Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 2:18 PM To:

[Exchange] RE: Reset Default permissions

[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:24 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.commailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: Reset Default permissions For grins, what about a MailboxRepairRequest. http://www.msexchangeblog.nl/2010/10

RE: [Exchange] Autoresponder for Customer Service

That type of a rule is client side only.. You could do it a Transport Rule with a bounce message. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of J- P Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 3:18 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange]

[Exchange] RE: Account lockout from CAS

an account? jb From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:55 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.commailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: Account

[Exchange] RE: Account lockout from CAS

the authorization decision. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 4:09 PM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange] RE: Account lockout from CAS

[Exchange] RE: Account lockout from CAS

to perform activesync. However, the user must still be authenticated prior to making the authorization decision. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 4:09 PM

[Exchange] RE: Logging mailbox access

http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2007/compliance-policies-archiving/exchange-2007-mailbox-access-auditing-part1.html From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kelsey, John Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:22 AM

[Exchange] RE: Logging mailbox access

. Many thanks! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:27 AM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange] RE: Logging mailbox access http

[Exchange] RE: Outlook 2010 not working on several machines after patches

The Cert on your CAS, is it SHA-1. There are issues with the 066 update and SHA-1 that might cause this. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of David McSpadden [dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 9:54

[Exchange] RE: Monitor Ex2010:

Ten bucks a month. Have not used them in a long time but they worked well back in the old days. https://www.site24x7.com/mail-server-monitoring.html From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 2:15

[Exchange] RE: Attachment Size Redux

I had a user send 8 emails of 50 MB each to 200 people in the span of 60 seconds. It didn’t crash but it created some backlogs on the queues for 20 to 30 minutes. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mayo, Bill Sent: Tuesday, December 9,

[Exchange] RE: Attachment Size Redux

, 2014 1:02 PM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange] RE: Attachment Size Redux Exchange – the new ftp server… *sigh* From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:42 AM To: exchange

[Exchange] RE: Exchange 2010 SP3 UR8 withdrawn...

Looks like it was re-released. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2986475 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:02 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] Exchange 2010 SP3

[Exchange] Setup Key or So Confused today.

So I am refreshing our Exchange Servers. Just the hardware, sticking with 2010. Dig out my old keys...and I am downloading the iso from MSVL. I notice there are keys there for virtually every MS product around. Now I get some cool stuff with my Campus agreement but not that cool. I googling

RE: [Exchange] Setup Key or So Confused today.

is that key too. Susan Bradley On 2/6/2015 12:14 PM, Kennedy, Jim wrote: So I am refreshing our Exchange Servers. Just the hardware, sticking with 2010. Dig out my old keys...and I am downloading the iso from MSVL. I notice there are keys there for virtually every MS product around. Now I

RE: [Exchange] Ex2013 all messages stuck in undefined submission

There are alot messages that are ndr Ok, that concerns me. Ndr's for what? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of J- P Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:45 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] Ex2013 all messages

RE: [Exchange] Public folder calendar brick level.

[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 4:22 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] Public folder calendar brick level. Well, there is a problem with my plan. Not sure how to do this automagically. ☺ Public Folder

RE: [Exchange] Public folder calendar brick level.

@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [Exchange] Public folder calendar brick level. So, a behavioral limitation. Gotcha. Your plan sounds okay. Other choice (restore from backup) takes too long to do on a regular basis. On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:15, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy

[Exchange] RE: Removing PF/database/last one error.

What is in ADSIEdit? CN=Configuration – CN=Services – CN=Microsoft Exchange – CN=YOUR ORG – CN=Administrative Groups – CN=First Administrative Group – CN=Servers – CN=SERVER NAME +— CN=InformationStore If you force remove it, that is the only lingering place it will show up I believe.

[Exchange] RE: Removing an email from all mailboxes

I have never run it that way, but my understanding is it will delete any message with any of those words. I do what you are doing this way: Get-Mailbox -Server ServerName | Search-Mailbox -SearchQuery 'Subject:FW: Your student-loan assistance package' -DeleteContent I got to head to a

[Exchange] RE: 2010 CAS/HUB refresh.

Non-event it appears. Add to the list: IIS 7 auth settings Fix up InternalUrl on WebServicesVirtualDirectory Those were the only surprises. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 11:05 AM

[Exchange] RE: Ex2010 and calendar issues

Remove the Iphones, keep them removed and test again. When email disappears it is always a rule in Outlook. When appointments mess up it is always a device, usually Apple. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Senter, John Sent: Tuesday,

[Exchange] RE: Ex2010 and calendar issues

Follow up question. How did they move the meeting? What device did they use? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:28 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: Ex2010 and calendar

[Exchange] RE: Failing mailbox moves

...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: 23 February 2015 14:43 To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] Failing mailbox moves Exchange 2010 current on sp's and updates. I have ten boxes out of 900 that won't move to a new server. They all

RE: [Exchange] Email encryption

They are right, but encryption won’t help. I suggest written notes sent via trusted employee with said employee videotaping the recipient eating the message after reading it. Then shooting the delivery guy when he gets back. Sorry, couldn’t resist. My cynical hat is on today. From:

RE: [Exchange] Email encryption

are you cynical? Because they can get in anyway? Or what? On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: They are right, but encryption won’t help. I suggest written notes sent via trusted employee with said employee

RE: [Exchange] RE: Failing mailbox moves

in the long run. Gavin Wilby IT Support Engineer From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: 23 February 2015 15:03 To: exchange@lists.myitforum.commailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject

[Exchange] RE: Failing mailbox moves

Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: 23 February 2015 15:03 To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: Failing mailbox moves Permissions are good and inherited. Export to PST is clean. Might be deleting and recreating, hoping to avoid that one. From: listsad

RE: [Exchange] CAS Array question

http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/03/23/demystifying-the-cas-array-object-part-1.aspx From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Richard Stovall Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3:47 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re:

RE: [Exchange] RE: Failing mailbox moves

...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 1:47 PM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: Failing mailbox moves Wooo, Cisco Unity. I will test tonight

[Exchange] RE: Mail volume per user per month

https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/Exchange-200720102013-0ea7662b From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kelsey, John Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 10:10 AM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange] Mail volume per user

[Exchange] RE: Broke public folder replication.

To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: Broke public folder replication. I shoulda remembered that. ☹ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 10

[Exchange] Broke public folder replication.

I suspect this is from my DC hardware upgrade, the timing it too much of a coincidence. When I decommissioned the last of the old DC’s it triggered the below for a few days before I saw it and bounced the Exchange servers. SACL Watcher servicelet encountered an error while monitoring SACL

[Exchange] RE: I have an email policy that is applying the .com in uppercase.

What if you deleted it and re-created it…really really quick. ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 1:47 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: I have an email policy that is

[Exchange] RE: Spam solutions

Barracuda. Been a very happy customer of theirs for 15 years or so. The have appliances of different sizes, I prefer that route, VM's or even in the cloud if you are into that kind of thing. Best vendor support I have ever had. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[Exchange] RE: Spam solutions

and one went to Jatheon. I have no skin in the game, at all, but I was surprised by this. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 4:19 PM To: ex

[Exchange] [NTSysADM] Odd .ps1 files.

Seeing these from time to time from my SIEM. Not a lot but fairly consistently. C:\Users\\AppData\Local\Temp\1hv3rbtn.tyz.ps1 These are regular students that can't even run powershell. Always a generated string for the file name. This is a pretty tight environment, the students don't even

[Exchange] RE: [NTSysADM] Odd .ps1 files.

Sorry, wrong forum. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 2:23 PM To: ntsysadm; exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] [NTSysADM] Odd .ps1 files. Seeing

[Exchange] 2016 design help needed.

Finally going to upgrade our 2010 Exchange to 2016. Current info: 1 CAS/Hub Transport. That is behind a reverse IIS proxy for external web mail. 2 Mailbox servers. 500 mailboxes per server. In rough numbers about half my users are OWA and half our Outlook. ActiveSync is pretty widely

RE: [Exchange] RE: Shared Mailbox with Outside Agencies

appreciate it. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:29 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: RE: [

RE: [Exchange] RE: Shared Mailbox with Outside Agencies

What Michael and Andrew are alluding to is it sounds like you have been given a solution to their problem by them, as is often the case. Dig in, get details on the work flow and processes and what is going on. Once you understand the problem and goals you are far more qualified to suggest a

RE: [Exchange] RE: Shared Mailbox with Outside Agencies

At least that is what I see as a possible solution from where I sit. John M. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Kennedy, Jim <kennedy...@elyriaschools.org<mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org>> wrote: So I get something similar to this from time to time. What my staff don’t know or think a

[Exchange] RE: 2016 design help needed.

one for free. You may find the free one is good-enough for you. ObDisclaimer: Kemp employs several Microsoft MVPs whom I know and trust. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 10:59 AM To: 'exchange

[Exchange] 2010 to 2016 Public Folder migration.

Bit confused here. Generated the FolderSize.csv. It shows all 32 of my Public Folders. Then generated PFMailbox.csv and it only shows \,"Mailbox1 Nothing beyond that, I expected a tree with all the PF's in it. Quadruple checked the syntax on the commands.

[Exchange] RE: 2010 to 2016 Public Folder migration.

So it makes one mailbox because I made my max size large enough for all of them to fit into one. -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:06 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: 2010 to 2016 Public Folder migration. Bit confused here. Generated

[Exchange] RE: 2010 to 2016 Public Folder migration.

@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: 2010 to 2016 Public Folder migration. Correct. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:23 AM To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [Exchange

[Exchange] RE: 2010 to 2016 Public Folder migration.

4831" \IPM_SUBTREE\Internet Newsgroups,"0" \IPM_SUBTREE\IT Services,"4462355" \IPM_SUBTREE\Staff,"1739848" \IPM_SUBTREE\Technology Lab Calendar (administration building),"7296542" \NON_IPM_SUBTREE,"0" \NON_IPM_SUBTREE\EFORMS REGISTRY,"0"

RE: [Exchange] Corporate contacts to phones

We publish contacts like that with public folders. Don’t have any road warriors but with 2016 OWA it wouldn’t be too bad. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Alice Goodman Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 4:45 PM To:

RE: [Exchange] Corporate contacts to phones

I stand corrected, no public folders in mobile OWA or Microsoft Outlook for Android or NINE. That is a bummer. From: Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 7:56 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] Corporate contacts to phones We publish contacts like

[Exchange] 2016 sudden time change

Out of the blue all the mailboxes on my Exchange 2016 are showing received times 4 hours in the future on incoming mail. Internal or external…makes no difference. They were fine until an hour ago.

[Exchange] RE: 2016 sudden time change

Dang, it’s not even an exact 4 hours. Not a time zone issue. It is more like three and a half hours. From: Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 5:18 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: 2016 sudden time change Out of the blue all the mailboxes on my Exchange 2016 are showing

[Exchange] RE: 2010-2016 coexistence for ActiveSync

I should add, a mailbox on the 2016 server with the temp.domain.com set up works just fine. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:20 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] 2010

[Exchange] 2010-2016 coexistence for ActiveSync

Pre upgrade environment. 1 2010 CAScas.domain.com 2 2010 MBX Current environment. 1 2010 CAS 2 2010 MBX 1 2016 Exch box temp.domain.com So, the next step is to get the 2016 box to act as the CAS for the mailboxes on the 2 2010 MBX boxes for OWA and ActiveSync. Got OWA no problem.

[Exchange] RE: 2010-2016 coexistence for ActiveSync

for URLs and authentication. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:37 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [Exchange] RE: 2010-2016 coexistence for ActiveSync I should add, a mailbox on the 2016

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

CU5 breaks single item restores in Backup Exec. They are working on it. https://vox.veritas.com/t5/Backup-Exec/Exchange-2016-CU5-Support/td-p/830356 From: "Michael B. Smith" To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:18 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exch

RE: [Exchange] Weird email access/wrong mailbox.

clients? Or the microsoft clients for iOS? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:01 PM To: Exchange List Subject: RE: [Exchange] Weird email access/wrong m

RE: [Exchange] Weird email access/wrong mailbox.

. I'll try and find the relevant information tomorrow when I'm back in the office. Tony On 15 May 2017 18:12, "Kennedy, Jim" <kennedy...@elyriaschools.org<mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org>> wrote: Just got back from vacation and I have two tickets on some odd mailbox acc

RE: [Exchange] Weird email access/wrong mailbox.

And they are all Apple devices, Iphones and Ipads. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 2:50 PM To: Exchange List Subject: RE: [Exchange] Weird email access/wrong mailbox. Interesting, nothing out

RE: [Exchange] Weird email access/wrong mailbox.

is your reverse proxy? I’ve never seen this issue with WAP, ARR, UAG, or TMG…. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:54 PM To: Exchange List Subject: RE: [Ex

  1   2   >