Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.

2006-02-24 Thread Philip Hazel
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Dennis Davis wrote: I'd like to request an additional private option -- force_local_authenticated -- for the SMTP transport. This option will be immediately useful in integrating exim with the Cyrus IMAP server and may be of more general use. I'm waiting to see if any

Re: Re: [exim] Exim: smart_route / routing based on From:

2006-02-24 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-02-24 at 08:18 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My config now looks like: addresslist senders_to_xyz = [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] smart_route_xyz: condition = ${if match_address{${address:$h_from}}{+senders_to_xyz} {yes}{no}} driver = manualroute transport =

Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.

2006-02-24 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-02-23 at 14:52 +, Dennis Davis wrote: Anyone should feel free to shoot my ideas down in flames if they can think of a better way of doing the following. Not in flames; the Exim stuff is useful, I can't think of a way to do it without modifying either Exim or Cyrus and your way

Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.

2006-02-24 Thread Tony Finch
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote: I'd be more inclined to hack Cyrus to have a new option, letting an unauthenticated user use the rcpt+folder delivery to any sub-folder of rcpt's INBOX _IF_ that folder is on rcpt's subscription list. Even better would be to allow those knowledgeable

Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.

2006-02-24 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-02-24 at 11:41 +, Tony Finch wrote: Doesn't Cyrus's sieve subaddress facility handle this already? We do unauthenticated delivery to Cyrus over LMTP and have unofficial support for +subaddresses, which get delivered to the user's inbox unless they have written appropriate Sieve

Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.

2006-02-24 Thread Tony Finch
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote: On 2006-02-24 at 11:41 +, Tony Finch wrote: We do unauthenticated delivery to Cyrus over LMTP and have unofficial support for +subaddresses, which get delivered to the user's inbox unless they have written appropriate Sieve code. Is that a generic

[OT] Sieve/Cyrus (was Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.)

2006-02-24 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-02-24 at 13:21 +, Tony Finch wrote: You can do it as a general rule if you have a sufficiently studly sieve implementation - it needs the variables extension. Since draft-ietf-sieve-variables-08.txt only defines scalar variables, you're not going to be able to validate the

Re: [OT] Sieve/Cyrus (was Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.)

2006-02-24 Thread Tony Finch
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote: Earlier today I updated the cmu.edu cyrus-imapd CVS check-out I have and I'm not seeing support; do you have this support as a patch to Cyrus, or to another Sieve implementation? Any details available online? We're still on Cyrus 2.1 owing to our vast

Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.

2006-02-24 Thread Dennis Davis
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:02:12 +0100 From: Phil Pennock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: exim-users@exim.org Cc: Dennis Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request. ... The OP is wanting to not need to set the Post

[exim] spammers IP ban

2006-02-24 Thread Mathieu Roy
Hello, I'm of the admins of Gna! (http://gna.org), a software development platform sponsored by the FSF France. We have an antispam policy composed of DSNBL checks at SMTP time and spamassassin checks afterwards (tagging mails sent to users, redirecting spams to a dedicated spam list mails

Re: [exim] spammers IP ban

2006-02-24 Thread Eric Fox
I do something similar to this. When I've rejected a message as known spam, a log entry is posted in maillog. I then use logsurfer to monitor maillog for these entries. Logsurfer parses out the IP and passes it on to a script that temporarily adds a blocking rule to the firewall, and comes back

[exim] Authentication and Relaying

2006-02-24 Thread Christopher Molnar
I have tried to read the docs and find a good example, however I am at a loss. I have tried to set up the ability for authorized users to relay through our smtp server. Anytime a user tries to connect and login and send messages thorugh to a non-local hosted domain we get a 501 - Relay