On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Dennis Davis wrote:
Here's the (short) patch against the source code for exim-4.60:
I have committed this patch, but I have changed the name of the option
to authenticated_sender_force, which seems to me to be better, and it
also brings it together with
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Dennis Davis wrote:
I'd like to request an additional private option --
force_local_authenticated -- for the SMTP transport. This option
will be immediately useful in integrating exim with the Cyrus IMAP
server and may be of more general use.
I'm waiting to see if any
On 2006-02-23 at 14:52 +, Dennis Davis wrote:
Anyone should feel free to shoot my ideas down in flames if they can
think of a better way of doing the following.
Not in flames; the Exim stuff is useful, I can't think of a way to do it
without modifying either Exim or Cyrus and your way
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
I'd be more inclined to hack Cyrus to have a new option, letting an
unauthenticated user use the rcpt+folder delivery to any sub-folder of
rcpt's INBOX _IF_ that folder is on rcpt's subscription list. Even
better would be to allow those knowledgeable
On 2006-02-24 at 11:41 +, Tony Finch wrote:
Doesn't Cyrus's sieve subaddress facility handle this already? We do
unauthenticated delivery to Cyrus over LMTP and have unofficial support
for +subaddresses, which get delivered to the user's inbox unless they
have written appropriate Sieve
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2006-02-24 at 11:41 +, Tony Finch wrote:
We do unauthenticated delivery to Cyrus over LMTP and have unofficial
support for +subaddresses, which get delivered to the user's inbox
unless they have written appropriate Sieve code.
Is that a generic
On 2006-02-24 at 13:21 +, Tony Finch wrote:
You can do it as a general rule if you have a sufficiently studly sieve
implementation - it needs the variables extension.
Since draft-ietf-sieve-variables-08.txt only defines scalar variables,
you're not going to be able to validate the
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
Earlier today I updated the cmu.edu cyrus-imapd CVS check-out I have and
I'm not seeing support; do you have this support as a patch to Cyrus, or
to another Sieve implementation? Any details available online?
We're still on Cyrus 2.1 owing to our vast
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:02:12 +0100
From: Phil Pennock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
Cc: Dennis Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [exim] [Patch supplied] Exim enhancement request.
...
The OP is wanting to not need to set the Post
(Not sure if this is the right mailing list for this request. But
here goes...)
Anyone should feel free to shoot my ideas down in flames if they can
think of a better way of doing the following. Note I'd prefer not
to have exim authenticate as a client to achieve the same effect.
Although this
10 matches
Mail list logo
