Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[Alexander Ilin]

Hello! 27.10.2016, 11:32, "Alexander Ilin" :27.10.2016, 01:53, "John Benediktsson" :does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``? Sorry, let me redo my last message. Well, it sort of works, but the result is not what I would expect, knowing that Factor works with Unicode, and Unicode does contain all the pseudographics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-drawing_character Okay, then. Since we don't seem to support that, I'll add the code page 437, if you don't mind. I found the mapping file here: http://unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/PC/CP437.TXTShall I call it io.encodings.8-bit.dos-437? ---=---Александр --
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[Alexander Ilin]

27.10.2016, 01:53, "John Benediktsson" :does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``? Sorry, let me redo my last message. Well, it sort of works, but the result is not what I would expect, knowing that Factor works with Unicode, and Unicode does contain all the pseudographics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-drawing_character Okay, then. Since we don't seem to support that, I'll add the code page 437, if you don't mind. ---=---Александр

--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[Alexander Ilin]

27.10.2016, 01:53, "John Benediktsson" :does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``? Well, it sort of works, but the result in what I would expect, knowing that Factor works with Unicode, and Unicode does contain all the pseudographics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-drawing_character Okay, then. Since we don't seem to support that, I'll add the code page 437, if you don't mind. ---=---Александр 

--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[Alexander Ilin]

27.10.2016, 03:14, "Jim Mack" :Are you talking about the characters that used to be used in character based windows apps?  LIke on this page from 179-218 or so? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page_437 Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. ---=---Александр 

--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[Jim Mack]

Are you talking about the characters that used to be used in character
based windows apps?  LIke on this page from 179-218 or so?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page_437



On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:52 PM, John Benediktsson  wrote:

> does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``?
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Alexander Ilin  wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'd like to parse some log-files created by an old-style DOS program.
>> They contain pseudographics characters for drawing frames and tables.
>> Technically, that's not ASCII, but a superset with all 8 bits used.
>> Do we have an 8-bit encoding that would support that? I took a look at
>> the basis\io\encodings\8-bit\ folder, but among those latin1-latin10
>> encodings nothing screams "DOS Pseudographics".
>>
>> A little guidance here, anyone?
>>
>> ---=---
>> Александр
>>
>>
>> 
>> --
>> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
>> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
>> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive.
>> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
>> http://sdm.link/telerik
>> ___
>> Factor-talk mailing list
>> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>>
>>
>
> 
> --
> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive.
> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
> http://sdm.link/telerik
> ___
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[John Benediktsson]

does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``?

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Alexander Ilin  wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I'd like to parse some log-files created by an old-style DOS program.
> They contain pseudographics characters for drawing frames and tables.
> Technically, that's not ASCII, but a superset with all 8 bits used.
> Do we have an 8-bit encoding that would support that? I took a look at the
> basis\io\encodings\8-bit\ folder, but among those latin1-latin10 encodings
> nothing screams "DOS Pseudographics".
>
> A little guidance here, anyone?
>
> ---=---
> Александр
>
>
> 
> --
> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive.
> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
> http://sdm.link/telerik
> ___
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

[Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

[Alexander Ilin]

Hello! I'd like to parse some log-files created by an old-style DOS program.They contain pseudographics characters for drawing frames and tables.Technically, that's not ASCII, but a superset with all 8 bits used.Do we have an 8-bit encoding that would support that? I took a look at the basis\io\encodings\8-bit\ folder, but among those latin1-latin10 encodings nothing screams "DOS Pseudographics". A little guidance here, anyone? ---=---Александр 

--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk