Gene Heskett wrote:
Nor have they AFAWK, made any attempt to relay the condensed gist of the
bitches back to the PA people. If there is not a comm channel, it will never
get fixed, it really is that simple.
But it is not at all clear whether your problems have anything to do
with
Craig White wrote:
clearly the people with problems with pulseaudio are in the minority or
it would have been removed.
Sadly, this is nonsense.
How do the pulseaudio developers know what percentage of users
have problems with it?
As far as I know, Fedora has never tried to run any kind of
Tim wrote:
I've had mixed results with pulseaudio. I have wondered if we can
totally rip it out, or if it's become another one of those required
things.
What I find completely baffling about pulseaudio
is that in my case it doesn't seem to make the slightest difference
whether it is working
How do the pulseaudio developers know what percentage of users
have problems with it?
Bugzilla count ?
As far as I know, Fedora has never tried to run any kind of poll
to find what problems users might have.
Nor with the kernel, cat, ed, cp ... so that is rather a silly point.
Also it
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 13:20 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
What exactly is pulseaudio meant to give someone like me,
who is only interested in the most basic aspects of computer sound?
The furthest my ambitions would ever reach
would be to plug headphones into my laptop and listen to Bob Dylan.
On Monday 25 August 2008, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Tim wrote:
I've had mixed results with pulseaudio. I have wondered if we can
totally rip it out, or if it's become another one of those required
things.
What I find completely baffling about pulseaudio
is that in my case it doesn't seem to make
On Monday 25 August 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
How do the pulseaudio developers know what percentage of users
have problems with it?
Bugzilla count ?
As far as I know, Fedora has never tried to run any kind of poll
to find what problems users might have.
Nor with the kernel, cat, ed, cp ... so
Gene Heskett wrote:
As far as I know, Fedora has never tried to run any kind of poll
to find what problems users might have.
Nor with the kernel, cat, ed, cp ... so that is rather a silly point.
With you Alan, I will respectfully disagree. If it doesn't work, we do
not think our
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it, it worked just fine, I
re-installed it all and I haven't had any noise from anything but
kmail and maybe kino since then, kino audio seemingly depending on
the phase of the moon, day of thew week and possibly multiplied by
the
On Monday 25 August 2008, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Craig White wrote:
clearly the people with problems with pulseaudio are in the minority or
it would have been removed.
Sadly, this is nonsense.
How do the pulseaudio developers know what percentage of users
have problems with it?
An excellent
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
As far as I know, Fedora has never tried to run any kind of poll
to find what problems users might have.
Nor with the kernel, cat, ed, cp ... so that is rather a silly point.
With you Alan, I will respectfully disagree. If it doesn't work, we do
Around 04:44pm on Monday, August 25, 2008 (UK time), Timothy Murphy scrawled:
but I think Fedora _does_ need to adopt a more newbie-friendly approach,
if it wants to overthrow the giant, which I hope it does.
Assuming overthrow the giant = replace MS Windows with Fedora, then I
am not sure that
I don't think Alan Cox was saying you were silly to complain -
he was saying I was silly to expect a poll of Fedora users
about your complaint.
Indeed.
My suggestion probably was silly,
but I think Fedora _does_ need to adopt a more newbie-friendly approach,
if it wants to overthrow the
On Monday 25 August 2008, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
As far as I know, Fedora has never tried to run any kind of poll
to find what problems users might have.
Nor with the kernel, cat, ed, cp ... so that is rather a silly point.
With you Alan, I will respectfully disagree. If
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:06 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:) np. I just wanted to avoid the generalization that I perceived
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:06 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:)
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
WTH does console-kit have to do with pulseaudio
The person logged into a console is given permission to do certain
things, such as use the sound card, manage removeable media, etc.
Typically, the sort of things that don't share well between
Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I think he gave you a really good answer too...
pulseaudio doesn't set the user permissions on devices but is handled by
ConsoleKit / HAL
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem
Sorry, I don't saw all discussion. But I know how to make work in F9
pulseaudio.
Just add user to groups: pulse, pulse-access, pulse-rt. Restart server. It's
work for me.
2008/8/24 Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I think he gave you a really good
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:22:30 -0700
Russell Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one's going to take people seriously when they say they are having
problems with PulseAudio, and people are just going to force PulseAudio
down peoples' throats when it's not working while insisting the problems
Gene Heskett wrote:
And thats NOT what I had. I made the mistake of running the sound detector
and it, or pulseaudio overwrote what I had. It should not touch things
unless you specifically tell it to.
Sound detector was a tool to configure your sound cards. It is going
to change things
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
But what I'm still left wondering is the fundamental question: What
the devil is the problem people imagine exists which they imagine
pulseaudio solves?. I can't even get my brain wrapped around the
motivation for pulseaudio. Simply because
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Different email address. #458611
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
And thats NOT what I had. I made the mistake of running the sound
detector and it, or pulseaudio overwrote what I had. It should not touch
things unless you specifically tell it to.
Sound detector was a tool to
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
But what I'm still left wondering is the fundamental question: What
the devil is the problem people imagine exists which they imagine
pulseaudio solves?. I can't even get my brain wrapped around the
On Sunday 24 August 2008, max wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, max wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using an
incompatible version. I was backing up the kubuntu's machines /home
directory with amanda, but I never got around to rebuilding the amanda client
after finding
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 02:38 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
If you do have such a setup, please share how you did it. Show *me* the
.conf
files that achieve that. Examples are worth 10k words (inflation) you know.
I've seen ALOT of
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:22:30 -0700
Russell Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one's going to take people seriously when they say they are having
problems with PulseAudio, and people are just going to force PulseAudio
down
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:08 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
as has already been pointed out - I don't think that there's much point
in going farther except to point out the thing that you don't seem to
get...unlike all other sound daemons, pulseaudio is
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
Both NetworkManager and PulseAudio are not perfect - in fact, far from
perfect
Gene Heskett wrote:
That isn't always true Craig, I have been denied permissions on several
occasions. It always surprised me at the time I don't now recall a
specific instance I can quote, but it has happened in the past and will no
doubt occur at some point in the future. ATM, not
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using an
incompatible version. I was backing up the kubuntu's machines /home
directory with amanda, but I never got around to
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Russell Miller wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
That isn't always true Craig, I have been denied permissions on several
occasions. It always surprised me at the time I don't now recall a
specific instance I can quote, but it has happened in the past and will no
doubt
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 10:18 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
Both
Gene Heskett wrote:
pulseaudio doesn't set the user permissions on devices but is handled by
ConsoleKit / HAL
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem (assuming that someone else hasn't
already reported it).
'Scuse me, Craig,
Craig White wrote:
I think you have personalized these things as if they were intended to
make your attempts to use Fedora more difficult.
No. Not personalized. I know they're not intended to make my attempts
to use Fedora more difficult. If anything, I'd say they were intended
to make
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:23 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using an
incompatible version. I was backing up the kubuntu's machines
Les Mikesell wrote:
You must have missed a lot - this was discussed to death when people
first had problems with pulseaudio. Consolekit assumes that the
speakers are owned exclusively by whoever happens to be logged into
the console at the moment. Personally I think this is as bad as if
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 10:40 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I think you have personalized these things as if they were intended to
make your attempts to use Fedora more difficult.
No. Not personalized. I know they're not intended to make my attempts
to use Fedora
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:23 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using
an incompatible
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
And for very good reasons on a multiuser OS that is not constrained to
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:33 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
And for
Russell Miller wrote:
I believe pulseaudio has a framework that can act as a suitable sound
server for a multiuser system or even network-stream access across
multiple systems, but the fedora configuration emulates a toy
single-user box instead. The bug isn't so much with either pulseaudio
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
And for very good reasons on a multiuser OS that is not constrained to
On Saturday 23 August 2008, g wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
Biostar, M7NCD-Pro, bios unk but up to date according to the biostar web
pages
maybe not.
Not even listed on the American pages, I have to goto the .tw pages to find
it.
Ok, did, but now I have no sound at all. The nforce is
On Friday 22 August 2008, g wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
[1]
be having address conflict.
Never had one before pulseaudio. No legitimate reason I should have one
now.
[2]
maybe disable ac97 in bios to see padmin shows.
I don't think I can in this bios.
strange a bios writer would not
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Friday 22 August 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it,
Gene Heskett wrote:
Some stuff is locally built, like I track the latest linus kernel 2.6.27-rc4,
amanda snapshots, kino-1.3.2, and all gmerlin dependencies, needed to make
openmovieeditor build and work, which when I do, I find it cannot import what
I already have, and it has no idea
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Some stuff is locally built, like I track the latest linus kernel
2.6.27-rc4, amanda snapshots, kino-1.3.2, and all gmerlin dependencies,
needed to make openmovieeditor build and work, which when I do, I find it
cannot
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I am not sure I am reading this correctly - are you building your
own kernels, and not using the Fedora ones?
Yes Mikkel, been doing that for years, probably from about 2 weeks after I
installed RH5.1 all those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
What a snotty, piss on everybody attitude! Regardless of how screwed up
no argument there. it is what i noticed. was sort of wondering what you
would come up with.
someones system is, complaints against pulseaudio are
g wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Yes g it does, thanks. It tells me for the 2nd time now that I should have
nothing to do with pulseaudio, the whole concept of its design is apparently
broken.
i got that impression also. there are some who have it working, but i believe
it is because it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
g wrote:
snip
i got that impression also. there are some who have it working, but i believe
it is because it is same systems pulse was built with.
I don't know about that - I have had it working on 3 different
g wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
g wrote:
snip
i got that impression also. there are some who have it working, but i
believe
it is because it is same systems pulse was built with.
I don't know about that - I have had it working on 3 different
systems, with 3 different sound chips,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
snip
but I
drought
what ever.
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html.gz
'The Linux Documentation
g wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
g wrote:
snip
i got that impression also. there are some who have it working, but i
believe
it is because it is same systems pulse was built with.
I don't know about that - I have had it working on 3 different
systems, with 3 different sound chips,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
snip
Well, by that logic, you could say that everyone that can not get PA
working are running the same systems...
not according to pulseaudio site. log it and you will see what i mean.
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free
g wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
snip
Well, by that logic, you could say that everyone that can not get PA
working are running the same systems...
not according to pulseaudio site. log it and you will see what i mean.
I know that the hardware it doesn't work on is not all the same,
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I am not sure I am reading this correctly - are you building your
own kernels, and not using the Fedora ones?
Yes Mikkel, been doing that for years, probably from
On Sat August 23 2008 03:02:49 Gene Heskett wrote:
If I rpm -e pulseaudio, or as much as I can without completely eviscerating
the system, it will start working, or did the last time, without even a
reboot.
The penny drops, Leave Pulseaudio for those that say it works, for everybody
else.
#
On Saturday 23 August 2008, g wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
What a snotty, piss on everybody attitude! Regardless of how screwed up
no argument there. it is what i noticed. was sort of wondering what you
would come up with.
Its a bit like complaining of a headache to the Dr., who suggests
On Saturday 23 August 2008, dexter wrote:
On Sat August 23 2008 03:02:49 Gene Heskett wrote:
If I rpm -e pulseaudio, or as much as I can without completely
eviscerating the system, it will start working, or did the last time,
without even a reboot.
The penny drops, Leave Pulseaudio for those
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it, it worked just fine,
Works fine here, and our 150+ boxen. From what I can gather, my speculation is
that you're seeing more like a lower-level (alsa/driver) issue, rather than
anything to do with pulseaudio.
-- Rex
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
As an experiment, its time to end it, it has failed miserably to produce
snip
i agree with all that you have said above to top. there is one acceptance,
'you are not alone'. i tried pulseaudio on mandriva a while back and
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it, it worked just fine,
Works fine here, and our 150+ boxen. From what I can gather, my speculation
is that you're seeing more like a lower-level (alsa/driver) issue, rather
than
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:) np. I just wanted to avoid the generalization that I perceived that
pulseaudio is broken universally. It just works for a vast majority of
users.
Your setup seems to be quite a special case of multi-card setup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
months, not that I care until we get an internet telephone that actually
works.
'magicjack' under wine? snick
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:) np. I just wanted to avoid the generalization that I perceived that
: pulseaudio is broken universally. It just works for a vast majority
: of users.
Your setup seems to
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:06 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:) np. I just wanted to avoid the generalization that I perceived that
: pulseaudio is broken universally. It
Craig White wrote:
I do detect a pattern though...it's the same one that had you giving up
on NFS and using samba for filesharing because you couldn't make NFS
work.
I would like to state for the record that like Rex, I have many, many
systems running with pulseaudio and no problems.
I
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:22 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I do detect a pattern though...it's the same one that had you giving up
on NFS and using samba for filesharing because you couldn't make NFS
work.
I would like to state for the record that like Rex, I have many,
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Different email address. #458611
--Russell
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Different email address. #458611
I think he gave you a really good answer too...
Craig White wrote:
I think he gave you a really good answer too...
pulseaudio doesn't set the user permissions on devices but is handled by
ConsoleKit / HAL
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem (assuming that someone else
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:59 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I think he gave you a really good answer too...
pulseaudio doesn't set the user permissions on devices but is handled by
ConsoleKit / HAL
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
Craig White wrote:
that was the first thing that occurred to me too and then I realized
that you didn't have any details of the hardware that would have made a
report to ConsoleKit worthwhile.
Obviously his issue was to respond to the report against pulseaudio and
that he did.
OK. But I
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:59 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
why should I have to open another report? Shouldn't it be
transferrable? Shouldn't either he or I be able to just change it to
the consolekit queue?
Yes, that sort of thing *should* be possible, but I don't see a
mechanism for doing
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 18:04 +0100, dexter wrote:
The penny drops, Leave Pulseaudio for those that say it works, for
everybody else.
# rpm -e `rpm -qa|grep pulse` pavucontrol
And never put this stuff near a kde desktop :-)
I've had mixed results with pulseaudio. I have wondered if we can
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Different email address. #458611
I think he
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it, it worked just fine, I re-installed it all
and I haven't had any noise from anything but kmail and maybe kino since
then, kino audio seemingly depending on the phase of the moon, day of thew
week and possibly multiplied by the age of the raccoon I
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it, it worked just fine, I re-installed it all
and I haven't had any noise from anything but kmail and maybe kino since
then, kino audio seemingly depending on the phase of the
On Friday 22 August 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings;
Because many of you said to use it, it worked just fine, I re-installed it
all and I haven't had any noise from anything but kmail and maybe kino
since then,
On Friday 22 August 2008, g wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
padmin displays, on the server tab, a whole menu of alsa stuff, every one
of which points into the nvidia chipsets builtin ac97 audio on this
motgher board, and absolutely zero reference is made to the the SBO-400
Audigy 2 card
just
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
just a thought, if padmin is seeing ac97 and not sbo-400, could you
possibly
be having address conflict.
Never had one before pulseaudio. No legitimate reason I should have one
now.
Have you tried checking to see if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
[1]
be having address conflict.
Never had one before pulseaudio. No legitimate reason I should have one now.
[2]
maybe disable ac97 in bios to see padmin shows.
I don't think I can in this bios.
strange a bios writer
On Friday 22 August 2008, Russell Miller wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Gene Heskett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
just a thought, if padmin is seeing ac97 and not sbo-400, could you
possibly
be having address conflict.
Never had one before pulseaudio. No legitimate reason I should
On Friday 22 August 2008, g wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
[1]
be having address conflict.
Never had one before pulseaudio. No legitimate reason I should have one
now.
[2]
maybe disable ac97 in bios to see padmin shows.
I don't think I can in this bios.
strange a bios writer would not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
Biostar, M7NCD-Pro, bios unk but up to date according to the biostar web
pages
maybe not.
Ok, did, but now I have no sound at all. The nforce is not showing in the
my thoughts in this were 'if' address conflicts
92 matches
Mail list logo
