[Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10. 6

2009-08-29 Thread nayden
Hi, I have installed the latest fink (0.29.9) in 64-bit mode, and issued an install coot to compile coot. When run, however, I get: DEBUG:: stating pydirectory /sw/share/coot/python INFO:: importing coot.py from /sw/share/coot/python/coot.py Importing python module coot using command from

Re: [Fink-users] arpack?

2009-08-29 Thread Martin Costabel
Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see it in the list of packages (on line for from the terminal).

Re: [Fink-users] arpack?

2009-08-29 Thread monipol
On 28/08/2009, at 23:09, Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see it in the list of packages (on line for from

Re: [Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10.6

2009-08-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
nayden wrote: Hi, I have installed the latest fink (0.29.9) in 64-bit mode, and issued an install coot to compile coot. When run, however, I get: DEBUG:: stating pydirectory /sw/share/coot/python INFO:: importing coot.py from /sw/share/coot/python/coot.py Importing python module coot

Re: [Fink-users] arpack?

2009-08-29 Thread Ben Abbott
On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:16 AM, monipol wrote: On 28/08/2009, at 23:09, Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems) http://www.finkproject.org/index.php?phpLang=en but I don't see

[Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Ben Abbott
$ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it. Reading dependency for

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread David Reiser
On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows

Re: [Fink-users] arpack?

2009-08-29 Thread monipol
On 29/08/2009, at 09:54, Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:16 AM, monipol wrote: On 28/08/2009, at 23:09, Ben Abbott wrote: I see arpack on the finkproject.org homepage 2009-08-28: arpack-96patched-1 (Solve large scale eigenvalue problems)

[Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but system-xfree86-dev only allows things to BuildDepend on it.

Re: [Fink-users] arpack?

2009-08-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
monipol wrote: I don't see any restrictions on arpack so it should be available on 10.6. I'm not 100% sure though because I'm not running Snow Leopard yet. Have you followed the upgrade instructions available on Fink's home page? http://www.finkproject.org Arpack was added to the

Re: [Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10.6

2009-08-29 Thread William G. Scott
Hi Nayden: I only got ahold of 10.6 late yesterday afternoon, after I found out from Apple my pre-ordered copy would not be shipped until September 8th. So I will have to get back to you after I try to compile it. Bill On Aug 29, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: nayden wrote:

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Martin Costabel
Ben Abbott wrote: [] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: *** [../libgutils.la] Error 1 make: *** [libgutils] Error 2 []

[Fink-users] nedit-5.6-cvs20081118-1 test package

2009-08-29 Thread kostka
The problem seems to be solved: I installed the test package: nedit 5.6cvs20081118-2 and openmotif4 /openmotif4-shlibs 2.3.2-1 First test's: copy paste into one window; from one to the other; column copy and paste; from

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Ben Abbott
On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: [] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory /sw/bin/sed: can't read /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libSM.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[1]: ***

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Martin Costabel
Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: [] grep: /usr/X11/lib/libSM.la: No such file or directory [] I assume the link below is good? http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/costabel/fix-x11-la.sh?view=log Yes.

Re: [Fink-users] Installing fink_64-bit and coot on 10.6

2009-08-29 Thread nayden
Alexander Hansen alexanderk.hansen at gmail.com writes: I'm forwarding this onto the coot maintainer. One of our other maintainers mentioned on IRC that he was having problems with at least some python modules configuring themselves based on the number of bits in the running kernel.

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev Depends on system-xfree86-dev, but

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Ben Abbott
On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: $ fink update-all Information about 9081 packages read in 0 seconds. The package 'fontconfig2-dev' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package fontconfig2-dev

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Martin Costabel
Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: [] I know that fontforge builds on i386/10.5 and x86_64/10.6. This looks like a case of upgrading from 10.5 and using packages built with xquartz. The only workaround is to rebuild all X11 using packages, unfortunately.

Re: [Fink-users] 10.6/32 bit fontforge failure was Re: 10.6/32bit and fontconfig2-dev build failure

2009-08-29 Thread Ben Abbott
On Aug 29, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: [] I know that fontforge builds on i386/10.5 and x86_64/10.6. This looks like a case of upgrading from 10.5 and using packages built with xquartz. The only