After updating to the latest Xcode 4.3.3 on my 10.7.4 system, went ahead to
update Fink and all the apps in its tree. All went well and complex packages
such as Wireshark built without error. However, the FontForge package fails
cause it has the Xcode virtual package as a requisite, and this
again.
JMC
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Juan Courcoul wrote:
After updating to the latest Xcode 4.3.3 on my 10.7.4 system, went ahead to
update Fink and all the apps in its tree. All went well and complex packages
such as Wireshark built without error. However, the FontForge package fails
On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
fink-0.33.0 was released on 6 June, 2012. This release introduces some
new features:
Will it be safe with the new Xcode 4.3.3 released in today's spate of new stuff?
JMC
So Apple finally decided to roll off a new flavor of the fat cat, aka Lion,
bringing it up to 10.7.4. Lots of stuff, the delta updater is around 360MB for
a fully patched 10.7.3 MBP, the combo updater goes for 1.5GB. Lots of security
holes plugged, including the infamous passwords in the log
On Apr 2, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On 4/2/12 11:37 AM, Richard Miles wrote:
When I try to install fink it says:
Veryifying that installed Xcode version is supported…
Found Xcode version: 3.2.2
ERROR: This version of fink need at least Xcode 4.1 on this OS C version.
I
On Jan 19, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/19/12 11:20 AM, Roy Mendelssohn wrote:
Hi All:
I followed the thread that if I upgrade to lIon, than I need to
reinstall Fink. What is unclear to me is if I can expect most
I was installing Fyodor's NMap scanner on Fink. The package source-installed
with no errors and is at the latest version (5.51)
However, the Fink package only installs nmap and does not include the GUI/X11
front-end, aka zenmap. And this is neither available as a separate install, at
least
On Jan 19, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/19/12 4:45 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
Running on Lion I encountered this running selfupdate. It occurred
on two different machines. A second execution of selfupdate did
not exhibit the
On 1/19/12 1:34 PM, Juan Courcoul wrote:
I was installing Fyodor's NMap scanner on Fink. The package
source-installed with no errors and is at the latest version
(5.51)
However, the Fink package only installs nmap and does not include
the GUI/X11 front-end, aka zenmap. And this is neither
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Zohar Ehrlich wrote:
Hi,
xcode 4.2 is not free from what i see
any way to get around this?
Free if you have 10.7 Lion, either from a paid upgrade or preinstalled on a new
Mac (my case). Quoth from http://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/
Xcode 4.2 for Lion
OK, I'll bite…
Can try a build on my late 2011 MBP w/ 10.7.2 4.2.1. Any special config you'd
like me to try? Like a parallel build of 8, or something?
J. Courcoul
On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Don't use text
. Then see if that
builds.
On 1/11/12 8:15 PM, Juan Courcoul wrote:
OK, I'll bite…
Can try a build on my late 2011 MBP w/ 10.7.2 4.2.1. Any special
config you'd like me to try? Like a parallel build of 8, or
something?
J. Courcoul
On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote
Just wanted to preliminarily report that the source install of Fink 0.31.6 on a
late 2011 MBP running 10.7.2 and with Xcode 4.2.1 succeeded with no issues.
Just moved my old /sw directory inherited when I migrated from an old 10.5.8
MBP that died and started completely afresh. Chose a
On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/8/12 4:48 PM, Juan Courcoul wrote:
Just wanted to preliminarily report that the source install of Fink
0.31.6 on a late 2011 MBP running 10.7.2 and with Xcode 4.2.1
succeeded
Not to threadjack but just for greater understanding on how to deal with
similar issues, should they present themselves. How do you solve any X11 issue
on 10.7 Lion, given that there is no install media per se in most
installations. be they OTW upgrades or factory default installs? In contrast
On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:05 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
On 21/12/11 08:44, Juan Courcoul wrote:
Now I want to bring my Fink fully into the Lion world, hopefully without
having to trash everything. O.S. is at 10.7.2. Downloaded and installed the
latest Xcode 4.2.1. Then gingerly tried to do
Well, the inevitable happened. My beloved Mac died peacefully: went to sleep,
never woke up. AASP diagnosed terminal logic board failure, repair cost over
$700 w/3 mo. warranty, wasn't worth it. Only thing salvageable (besides the
screws and the DIMMs) was the HDD, which survived intact. Due to
Running the regular Fink selfupdate, for a change I paid attention to
what it was doing and was struck by the fact that it seemed to be
updating the 10.4 tree. Examined the fink.conf file and discovered
that it had auto-configured itself at install time with the
SelfUpdateTrees: 10.4
Ok, since the holiday vacations have provided a little spare time to
catch up with updating all the fun stuff on our Macs, let me see if I
got this right. For those of us still lagging behind with older XCode
3.x versions and currently using X11 applications thru Fink, we have
these
Tagging in the heels of the iPhone 3G circus and the MobileMe
abomination comes the XCode 3.1 update, with the following mini-
description from the Developer Connection entry:
Xcode 3.1 is an update release of the developer tools for Mac OS X,
and is the same version included with the
On Feb 19, 2006, at 1:02 AM, stephen joseph butler wrote:
2006/2/19, Juan Courcoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
latest source offering for Panther: 0.10.12. Unfortunately, especially
in comparison to the previous releases, this one turned out to be a
real snail. Startup takes over three minutes
A short while ago, I upgraded my Fink-based Ethereal sniffer to the
latest source offering for Panther: 0.10.12. Unfortunately, especially
in comparison to the previous releases, this one turned out to be a
real snail. Startup takes over three minutes, and starting a packet
capture takes even
On Mar 27, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Clemence Magnien wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 09:28:59AM -0600, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
This is neat-hadn't heard of it before. The man page is huge and I'd
like to get more familiar with setting screen to run fink compilations
routing the log to a file (I understand
Do note that, of all, this is the weakest authentication possible with
X11. While the ease of use might be very tempting, beware that you can
fall afoul with even moderately proficient hackers this way. If
security is not an issue to you or in your particular setting, enjoy
the simplicity and
I wholeheartedly agree with Martin. Ever since I began enjoying Fink,
I've always opted for source distribution but I sure do not want to
have to wrangle with CVS to get it. Heck, the day Fink came out with
rsync selfupdating was a happy day indeed ! If there were to be no
other option but
On Mar 21, 2004, at 4:44 PM, Jim Saklad wrote:
I formerly used Norton AntiVirus for Mac, but stopped when it
triggered kernel panics under Jaguar at the end of Fink compiles.
Can anyone who is using Fink to compile from source tell me whether
or not the current version of NAV-M causes any such
On Mar 21, 2004, at 11:26 AM, David Rocamora wrote:
On Mar 20, 2004, at 11:31 PM, Mark Moorcroft wrote:
Observation:
With XDarwin/Gnome running full screen and in the background I find
that my system load is only about .15, but my Powerbook is burning
hot.
Your system load (as displayed by
Just upgraded to a new-model PB 15, which came with Panther
preinstalled. After updating to 10.3.2 + associated patches,
downloading and installing XCode 1.1, installing X11 from the DVD and
installing the SDK as well, it was time for good things, so I opted to
install Fink from scratch, in
so I can't check it myself).
--
Alexander Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
On Jan 8, 2004, at 2:37 PM, Juan Courcoul wrote:
snip
make[1]: gcc3: Command not found
make[1]: *** [Aaa.o] Error 127
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of failed, exit code 2
Failed
On Saturday, November 8, 2003, at 08:16 AM, Michael Bovee wrote:
J. Courcoul wrote:
Just downloaded both the Dec2002 Dev. CD and the Aug2003 GCC Update.
Surely this will be the last Jag. update I do before going the Panther
way early next year.
Just wanted to confirm that all that needs be done
Just downloaded both the Dec2002 Dev. CD and the Aug2003 GCC Update.
Surely this will be the last Jag. update I do before going the Panther
way early next year.
Just wanted to confirm that all that needs be done to upgrade to GCC
3.3 is install the Dev. CD and the Update, then do a fink
On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 06:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Chris Devers wrote:
The new version of nessus-plugins can't get past ./configure:
[]
### ./configure failed, exit code 1
Failed: compiling nessus-plugins-1.2.3-1 failed
Justin is probably using bash as his /bin/sh,
On Saturday, May 18, 2002, at 01:42 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
Works fine over here. Do you have the unstable tree activated by
chance? If so, try editing your /sw/etc/fink.conf, and make sure the
unstable tree is listed in there *before* the stable tree.
Well, tcltk-dev
Sorry to bother all you fine folks with probably a trivial problem, but
I'm having trouble updating a few packages.
Having set up Fink to retrieve from CVS, did a selfupdate and discovered
that quite a few packages had been repackaged so to say, with the
addition of the shlibs. Most of the
Given that we have here a large community of experienced programmers in
both the Unix and the Mac worlds, has anybody in contact with the folks
at UC Berkeley offered to build a version of the SETI screensaver and/or
command-line martiancatcher optimized for the PPC G4 architecture ?
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 07:41 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Apologies if this is the 64th reply on this, I seem to have a
rather long mail lag.
Seems like many people have mentioned this recently; I've been
seeing it for a few days too. Is
On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 01:39 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
I am about to upgrade nessus. The problem is that there will NOT be a
smooth upgrade. I changed the name of some of the pkgs, and added the
shared libraries. Anyone currently running nessus will need to do this
before
37 matches
Mail list logo
