-- Original Message ---
From: Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sourceforge.net
a) using script from CORE-4212 and FB 2.1.2, created database with
wrong FK. b) add some data into permanent table at_namespace c)
backup this database d) restore using FB 2.1.2 - OK e) restore using
FB
-- Original Message ---
From: Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sourceforge.net
It is physically impossible to check detail data in all instances
of detail GTT when master record is changed.
Regards,
Vlad
--- End of Original Message ---
At time of upgrade, what will
-- Original Message ---
From: Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sourceforge.net
It is physically impossible to check detail data in all instances
of detail GTT when master record is changed.
Regards,
Vlad
--- End of Original Message ---
At time of upgrade, what will
Am 10.09.2013 23:34, schrieb Ann Harrison:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Vlad Khorsun
hv...@users.sourceforge.net mailto:hv...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
First, thanks for the details (BTW, is there a link for the spec)
AFAIR, SQL standard is not free, so there is
In tracker case 4212, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
It is documented since introducing GTT in v2.1 that constraints between
temporary and permanent tables is forbidden. This requirement is per SQL
standard.
I want to be sure that this is correct (sorry Vlad), cus it seems wrong.
I can see that
In tracker case 4212, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
It is documented since introducing GTT in v2.1 that
constraints between temporary and permanent tables is forbidden. This
requirement is per SQL standard.
I want to be sure that this is correct (sorry Vlad), cus it seems wrong.
11.8
In tracker case 4212, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
It is documented since introducing GTT in v2.1 that
constraints between temporary and permanent tables is forbidden. This
requirement is per SQL standard.
I want to be sure that this is correct (sorry Vlad), cus it seems wrong.
In tracker case 4212, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
It is documented since introducing GTT in v2.1 that constraints
between temporary and permanent tables is forbidden. This
requirement is per SQL standard.
I want to be sure that this is correct (sorry Vlad), cus it seems wrong.
11.8
I will point out that, the specs does allow for GTT to reference GTT,
which is not what your original comment stated (that a GTT could not have
any dependencies/references).
I meant exactly this, sorry if it was not clear.
I have added comments to the 2 related tracker cases,
