-Original Message-
From: Tally [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 2:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS ..where to put..DMZ or ...
This question has been asked n number of times on
this list. but after searching through the archives
it has
At 06:59 PM 8/24/99 +0200, Chris Osicki wrote:
Why would you want connect all four to the same switch? The switches are
nowdays not that expensive ;-) Am I missing something here?
Different VLANS on the same switch. There have been reports that
Catalyst cam tables can get messed up. I
From: "peter pajak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: quad cards on firewalls
not exactly, since all NICs on sun boxes always have the same mac address
(burnt into the motherboard) all switches are designed to handle that all
right. besides, all comunications start with the ip address being
What RFC covers this 90.0.0.0 network? According to IANA-ARIN, this is a reserved netblock
(64.0.0.0 - 95.255.255.255). Which RFC talks about it? I have no idea what they're reserved
for, and doing a search on the range itself gets me nothing but a blank screen.
Any ideas? Only thing I know is
At 05:55 AM 8/24/99 -0700, peter pajak wrote:
not exactly, since all NICs on sun boxes always have the same mac address
^^
Not always! There is an eeprom setting to adjust this behavior.
(burnt into the motherboard) all switches are designed to
http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/forum_message.html?forum=2head=32id=32
forum - Guest Feature: The Internet Auditing Project (p1 of 7)
Thu Aug 19 1999
Cautionary Tales: Stealth Coordinated Attack HOWTO
It's buried kinda deep in the article, under; E) Embedding, and
Why would you want connect all four to the same switch? The switches are
nowdays not that expensive ;-) Am I missing something here?
Primarily for reasons of bandwidth. Fast EtherChannel, for example, lets you
aggregate multiple Fast Ethernet links into "virtual" pipes. So to use Sun's
Quad
Why would you want connect all four to the same switch? The switches are
nowdays not that expensive ;-) Am I missing something here?
Well, for one thing, you could run sun-trunking-1.0 which is compatible
with about 10 different switch vendors and get aggregate 400MB full duplex
throughput.
Actually this is pretty easy to do if you are not the primary domain
controller for your address space. Your primary domain controller
(usually for ISP) can redirect your inbound traffic to another location by
simply changing your addresses in their DNS. It does however, take some
time for all
If anyone can help:
I have internet access via the local cable operator.
I have an NT server, and 3 clients (two desktops and a laptop)
What have you found to be the best set up for this type of environment?
Regards,
DJM
___
Get
I assume you're talking about remote access solutions as opposed to network
to network ...
You should also factor in the cost of managing the solution you pick, and
also the security of the solution. We ended up choosing Nortel's Contivity
box for this reason. The users find it really easy to
I'm a machine Silicon Graphics with interface ec0 and ec1.
I'm Gauntlet 3.1.1 for IRIX 6.2.
The interface ec0 is trusted and is conecting to switch in the LAN.
How I can conecting the interface ec1 with cable UTP direct to port
ethernet in a router 3COM Netbuilder II?.
Thank.
-
[To unsubscribe,
What I had been told by Sun support several years ago (and appears
to be true AFAIK) is that the interfaces actually have separate MAC
addresses burned into them, but Sun (4.x Solaris) only reports
the first MAC address.
I can't remember how at this point, but I was shown how to find the
MAC
At 07:40 PM 8/23/99 -0400, spiff wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Joshua Chamas wrote:
Many of the scans that hit my network, especially on the
weekends, are of the port 8080 variety, sometimes including
port 3128, which seem to be looking for HTTP Proxy services.
Yes I agree, there is
Browsing doesn't really work that great with Microsoft Networking,
especially if Win 95 boxes are involved. I do not know what causes this
problem to begin with, but I know that we experienced this frequently when
we were using SecuRemote (Checkpoint FW-1). It didn't happen consistently,
though
Use a Linux box as your masquerading gateway.
Carric Dooley
COM2:Interactive Media
http://www.com2usa.com
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Daren John wrote:
If anyone can help:
I have internet access via the local cable operator.
I have an NT server, and 3 clients (two desktops and a laptop)
The Windows NT resource kit includes a utility called winscl to browse a
WINS server from a command line.
-Original Message-
From: Jen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 11:48 AM
To: Tyron Legette; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network browsing through a VPN
IMHO the best option is to buy a powerful desktop, install NT or Linux and a
real Firewall.
The option I would suggest is cheaper and easier but should not be
considered secure.
UMAX makes a product called UGate+ which is a combination Cable/Modem or DSL
Router and DHCP server.
Buy this and
At 11:02 AM 8/25/99 -0400, Gerrish, Robert wrote:
What I had been told by Sun support several years ago (and appears
to be true AFAIK) is that the interfaces actually have separate MAC
addresses burned into them, but Sun (4.x Solaris) only reports
the first MAC address.
I can't remember how at
To browse an NT/Windows network remotely, your dialup-client must belong to
the same Workgroup/Domain as the NT Logon Domain.
If not, you won't get a browse list. If yes, then you will.
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tyron
Contivity is also more secure than VPNet, SecuRemote, and many other
solutions we looked at. The reason is that when someone is running the
Contivity client, all incoming Internet traffic can be blocked -- all
incoming and outgoing traffic go through your firewall. They also allow
split
DNS is 53
Disable tcp/ip sharing
Still easier to setup ipchains and use a linux machine to masq as a
gateway
-
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Sweeney, Patrick wrote:
IMHO the best option is to buy a powerful desktop, install NT or Linux and a
real
I'd put money on the fact that you haven't configured your WINS servers and
are just relying on broadcast traffic, which may well get eaten.
You need some way to make sure that all clients know how to get to the
master browser for the network. The PDC is always the master browser.
Make sure
Of course since this a VPN connection there really isn't a DHCP lease. If
there is a VPN connectoid (Dial-up Networking entry) you can specify the
WINS server in there. (As far as I know that means manually configuring the
connectoid on every machine
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nagy
24 matches
Mail list logo
