This is something that I have been thinking about.
Most of the solutions out there are flash online or flash offline but not that
supportive of
both at the same time. There are many cases where software needs to be an
application
and net savvy. For example, creating an application using
to.
Anyway, thanks for the idea, I learnt something new.
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ryanm
Sent: Wednesday, 12 July 2006 5:27 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac equivalent of ActiveX
Patrick... gee that sounds an awful lot like... Apollo :-)If you're not familar with it, check it outhttp://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo
On 7/11/06, palmer2012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is something that I have been thinking about.
Most of the
I didn't know about Apollo. I hope the pricing is reasonable. Still, it would
be interesting
to see Firefox develop in that direction. It makes a lot of sense. Currently
both the
browser and web server technology is quite limited. Everything needs to take
two
evolutionary steps
Is free reasonable enough? Apollo is a runtime, much like the Flash Player, only instead of it being a browser runtime like the Flash Player is, it is a runtime that installs at the OS level. It will be distributed freely, as is the Flash player, and as far as distribution mechanisms and
5 matches
Mail list logo
