I would expect the PC requirements for the 6K platform to be extremely
modest since all of the radio processing is done by the ARM processor
in the radio and the PC is simply the client for the GUI much like a Web
browser. I believe Flex has speculated that even a netbook type computer
will
that would be beneficial to the user.
I have a 5K and wanted to know what significant gains there would be with the
new platform.
John
From: Ross Stenberg
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:49 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K 6K ?
I would expect
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:26 AM, W1JCW w1...@hotmail.com wrote:
wanted to know what significant gains there would be...
John, a significant gain is that the new design can receive several slices
of spectrum at once. In other words, you can run a number of the
lightweight
Or tablet, pad, smartphone, or control surface...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Ross Stenberg
ross.stenb...@charter.net wrote:
I would expect the PC requirements for the 6K platform to be extremely
modest since all of the radio processing is done by the ARM processor in
the radio and the PC
At 09:51 AM 5/24/2012, Tony Estep wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:26 AM, W1JCW w1...@hotmail.com wrote:
wanted to know what significant gains there would be...
John, a significant gain is that the new design can receive several slices
of spectrum at once. In other words, you
OOPS! I just re-read the PDF brochure: Slice Receivers allow you to
simultaneously visually and audibly monitor multiple frequencies
within the same band or multiple bands . Looks like we will have
audio to use. Multiple means at least 2, and maybe 4/8. I don't see
the hardware connection
In the 6700, there are 8 slice receivers but each of those will be capable
of supporting multiple sub RX as in PSDR. We have not decided how many
software receivers to run on the DaVinci per slice and if we did, how you
might use them.
Right now, I want one per slice to be perfect.
Bob
On
That is very interesting and not mentioned at all in the brochure. It
would be awesome to be able to create a slice for each CW band segment
and output that in some way to skimmer for multiple band decoding
similar to the QS1R. Or maybe Alex would be willing to work on an
interface to connect
@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K 6K ?
In the 6700, there are 8 slice receivers but each of those will be capable
of supporting multiple sub RX as in PSDR. We have not decided how many
software receivers to run on the DaVinci
Yes, they will be totally independent receivers'
Tim Ellison, W4TME
Product Management, Sales Support
FlexRadio Systems^(TM)
4616 W Howard Ln, Suite 1-150
Austin, TX 78728
Phone: 512-535-4713 Ext. 223
Email: t...@flexradio.com mailto:t...@flexradio.com
Web: www.flexradio.com
OK, let's hold on a sec here guys. There's all kinds of concepts and
language that do not match the architecture of the radio being bandied
about. Here are the facts:
1. In the architecture a slice receiver is a complete full functioning
receiver.
2. There are no concepts in the architecture
What are the BIG differences between the two platforms ?
I think the 6K has the entire platform in one unit with a PC portion ??
I never had issues with the 5K as I build my own high end PC so that's not a
concern.
73-
W1JCW
John
___
FlexRadio
12 matches
Mail list logo
