Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Mathias =?iso-8859-1?q?Fr=F6hlich?=
Hi, On Samstag 19 Februar 2005 20:01, Jon Stockill wrote: I've just had a thought presumably now the ground cache code has been added it would be possible to have a carrier with a ski jump for the harrier model? That opens up another interesting area of deck operations. Yes, I think it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Mathias =?iso-8859-1?q?Fr=F6hlich?=
Good morning, (... at least in europe :) On Samstag 19 Februar 2005 14:59, Jon Stockill wrote: It turned out there was an ancient version of GLU hiding in /usr/local - which hadn't caused any problems until now - eliminating that solved the problem. Good. Thanks for the feedback anyway!

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Jon Stockill
Vivian Meazza wrote: Mathias would need to reply definitively, but I think so. Just by chance I have been fiddling with a model of HMS Hermes with a ski-jump, but I was going to remove it, and restore it to her strike carrier days. I served aboard her in her last commission as a strike carrier. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Jon Stockill
Vivian Meazza wrote: I'm not sure that the Nimitz version in cvs has cats. If it has, then don't forget that the Seahawk has differential brakes, and no nosewheel steering. I have a more detailed version available here: ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dynu.com/fgfs/Nimitz/ Warning: it's still under

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Stockill Vivian Meazza wrote: I'm not sure that the Nimitz version in cvs has cats. If it has, then don't forget that the Seahawk has differential brakes, and no nosewheel steering. I have a more detailed version available here: ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dynu.com/fgfs/Nimitz/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Jon Stockill
Vivian Meazza wrote: Yes, make sure that this is in your ...Data/AI/nimitz-demo.xml file: solidElevator-3-Deck/solid solidDeck/solid In place of whatever solid.../solid appears there now. Ah, so I fell through the elevator then :-) That would explain the view of the hangar deck. --

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Stockill wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: Yes, make sure that this is in your ...Data/AI/nimitz-demo.xml file: solidElevator-3-Deck/solid solidDeck/solid In place of whatever solid.../solid appears there now. Ah, so I fell through the elevator then :-) That would

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Jim Wilson
From: Vivian Meazza Jon Stockill wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: Yes, make sure that this is in your ...Data/AI/nimitz-demo.xml file: solidElevator-3-Deck/solid solidDeck/solid In place of whatever solid.../solid appears there now. Ah, so I fell through the

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-20 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jim Wilson wrote: From: Vivian Meazza Jon Stockill wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: Yes, make sure that this is in your ...Data/AI/nimitz-demo.xml file: solidElevator-3-Deck/solid solidDeck/solid In place of whatever solid.../solid appears there

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Jon Stockill
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 17:30, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Are you sure your runtime librairies ( that seems to be compiled with gcc-2.95.3 ) match your compiler ? That is my impression too. It turned out there was an ancient version of GLU hiding in /usr/local - which

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Stockill Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 17:30, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Are you sure your runtime librairies ( that seems to be compiled with gcc-2.95.3 ) match your compiler ? That is my impression too. It turned out there was an ancient version of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Jon Stockill
Vivian Meazza wrote: Let us know how you get on. Melchior claims the first successful Seafire landing. Took off from KSFO, and nailed the seahawk to the deck on the first try, then couldn't work out how to get the thing onto the cat to launch. That secondary ASI comes in rather handy :-) -- Jon

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Stockill wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: Let us know how you get on. Melchior claims the first successful Seafire landing. Took off from KSFO, and nailed the seahawk to the deck on the first try, Well done. then couldn't work out how to get the thing onto the cat to launch. I'm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Jon Stockill
Vivian Meazza wrote: Well done. It was easier than I expected. ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dynu.com/fgfs/Nimitz/ Warning: it's still under development, and some of the textures are HUGE. I'll grab that and have a go tomorrow. That secondary ASI comes in rather handy :-) It was called the Deck Landing

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Stockill Vivian Meazza wrote: Well done. It was easier than I expected. ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dynu.com/fgfs/Nimitz/ Warning: it's still under development, and some of the textures are HUGE. I'll grab that and have a go tomorrow. That secondary ASI comes in rather handy

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-19 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Stockill wrote Vivian Meazza wrote: Well done. It was easier than I expected. ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dynu.com/fgfs/Nimitz/ Warning: it's still under development, and some of the textures are HUGE. I'll grab that and have a go tomorrow. If you take it all, you might

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Mathias =?iso-8859-1?q?Fr=F6hlich?=
Jon, I cannot reproduce this. It just works for me with a plain cvs checkout using that scenry tile from Scenery-0.9.8. On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 01:24, Jon Stockill wrote: (gdb) bt #0 0x0ce8b760 in ?? () #1 0x40142974 in __dynamic_cast (from=0xce8b760, to=0x8548f9c typeinfo for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Frederic Bouvier: Quoting Mathias Fröhlich : Jon, I cannot reproduce this. It just works for me with a plain cvs checkout using that scenry tile from Scenery-0.9.8. On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 01:24, Jon Stockill wrote: (gdb) bt #0 0x0ce8b760 in ?? () #1

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Mathias Fröhlich : Jon, I cannot reproduce this. It just works for me with a plain cvs checkout using that scenry tile from Scenery-0.9.8. On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 01:24, Jon Stockill wrote: (gdb) bt #0 0x0ce8b760 in ?? () #1 0x40142974 in __dynamic_cast (from=0xce8b760,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi, On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 16:08, Frederic Bouvier wrote: I don't know if it is true for gcc, but with MSVC, rtti needs to be activated with a specific compile-time option otherwise the result is unpredictable. I see, this is the first usage of rtti in flightgear. But all those

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Jon Stockill
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 16:08, Frederic Bouvier wrote: I don't know if it is true for gcc, but with MSVC, rtti needs to be activated with a specific compile-time option otherwise the result is unpredictable. I see, this is the first usage of rtti in flightgear. But

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Jon Stockill
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: From that backtrace: There is exactly one dynamic_cast in this function. In theory it should never happen that the argument to that dynamic_cast is zero. Since I cannot reproduce it myself, can you help me? Could you please apply the attached patch and tell me of some of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Jon Stockill : Mathias Fröhlich wrote: From that backtrace: There is exactly one dynamic_cast in this function. In theory it should never happen that the argument to that dynamic_cast is zero. Since I cannot reproduce it myself, can you help me? Could you please apply the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-18 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi, On Freitag 18 Februar 2005 17:30, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Are you sure your runtime librairies ( that seems to be compiled with gcc-2.95.3 ) match your compiler ? That is my impression too. Greetings Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Flightgear-devel] Segfault from todays CVS

2005-02-17 Thread Jon Stockill
Most likely connected to the ground-cache updates - as it only seems to affect yasim aircraft. (gdb) run --aircraft=hunter --airport=RCSS Starting program: /usr/bin/fgfs --aircraft=hunter --airport=RCSS [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 16384 (LWP 1938)] Failed to find