Hi,
A question was asked last week on running FG and
OpenGC on the same machine. Well, theone way is to
run each app in it's own window and use the
loopback address of 127.0.0.1 to communicate via sockets.
fgfs ..
--opengc=socket,out,24,127.0.0.1,5800,udp ...
Depending on
* Martin van Beilen -- Saturday 23 February 2002 02:54:
If I type ls -l (reflex :-)) to the property interface, fgfs
locks so hard that my voodoo card doesn't get reset to its off
state. If I type ls blah (literally) I get an ERR message as
required. It seems to happen with all characters
Hi,
For what it's worth: I made an extended test of several German/Austrian
airports after installing the most recent CVS version including Curt's
patch. These are the results:
Working (no mishap):
EDDM
LSZR
EDDS
EDDN
LOWI
LIBP
LSZS
LSPM
These require scenery packages e000n40 + e010n40. All
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 20:52, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
This may or may not be related but when I start up at an airport for
which i have no scenery, the elevation is below 0. At EHAM it is
-17 ft as shown in /position/altitude-ft.
Actually, when an ocean tile is automatically generated,
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 11:25, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I believe I have found/fixed the initialization order problem.
Flightgear has a concept of an 'absolute' view position in cartesian
coordinates where (0,0,0) is the center of the Earth; and a 'relative'
view position where (0,0,0) is the
The down side of this is that with the monitoring tools our network
admins have, we are most definitely no longer under the radar screen.
In fact the network traffic to/from the flightgear server dwarfs the
traffic for any other machine here in the department.
Oh, I know what you're talking
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
If you use flightgear in any academic or research context, please read
this message through and please send me a response. (Directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is preferred.)
-- Request --
I would like to be able to do a better, more definitive job at
justifying our
Hi,
first I want to say that there's nothing personal in this 'case'. And I
don't care too much if it's my code or David's code (or both) that
'survive' at the end.
I've written WeatherCM in an attempt to learn the ++ of the C++ and
thus it did it's job for me.
But what puzzels me is the
Michael Basler wrote:
John Wojnaroski wrote:
A question was asked last week on running FG and OpenGC
on the same machine. Well, the one way is to
John, that might have been me ;-) The picture in the Gallery is just
fascinating.
I tried downloading OpenGC stuff, but
Erik,
It looks like the .sf.net domain sometimes doesn't work.
Try uding opengc.sourceforge.net instead.
...which does not work either :-( But thanks for the hint, anyway. I'll try
again later; it should return sometime.
Regards, Michael
--
Michael Basler, Jena, Germany
I tried downloading OpenGC stuff, but
http://opengc.sf.net/
seems to be dead (might be temporarily, though). Is the FG related stuff
under that same address (I recall it was integrated, right?) or somewhere
else?
Try http://www.opengc.org.
If the problem persists, I can upload a
Christian Mayer writes:
The rest of FlightGear won't have
to know about that -- all it has to know is how to get an environment
object:
const FGEnvironment * env = globals.get_env_mgr()-getEnv(lat, lon, alt);
FGPhysicalProperty wdbpos = WeatherDatabase-get(position);
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:29:18 -0800,
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Megginson wrote:
I've added two new properties tied to the FGEnvironment class
(you'll see these only if you compile with --with-new-environment):
http://www.chuckyeager.com/
Jon
Chuck Yeager.com.url
begin 600 Chuck Yeager.com.url
M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I05-%55),/6AT='`Z+R]W=WN8VAU8VMY96%G97(N8V]M
M+VEN95X+FAT;6P-@T*6TEN=5R;F5T4VAOG1C=71=#0I54DP]:'1T#HO
M+W=W=RYC:'5C:WEE86=EBYC;VTO:6YD97@N:'1M;`T*36]D:69I960]03`T
1-D0V-D)%14)0S$P,3DR#0H=
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boslough, Mark B) [2002.02.22 18:40]:
Is there no longer a tower view option? 0.7.8 could toggle from
pilot to chase to tower view, I believe. 0.7.9 does not seem to
have this feature.
I think you're mistaken. FlightGear has never had a tower view.
--
Cameron Moore
[
Hi,
A question was asked last week on running FG and OpenGC on the same machine.
Well, the one way is to
run each app in it's own window and use the loopback address of 127.0.0.1 to
communicate via sockets.
fgfs .. --opengc=socket,out,24,127.0.0.1,5800,udp ...
Shift-5
I'm having a mental block right now, and would appreciate help on a
simple question. How do I rotate an object (in raw OpenGL or
preferable, plib/ssg) around a point other than the origin? Do I have
to transform the object to the origin, rotate it, then transform back
again?
Thanks,
David
David wrote:
3. Concentrate on JSBSim and YASim for the FDM integration at first.
I still think sailing planes need a good weather database the most.
While JSBSim and YASim may be the best flight models we have
generally, AFAIK neither JSBSim nor YASim has a sailing plane (in the
works).
All
At 2/23/02, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boslough, Mark B) [2002.02.22 18:40]:
Is there no longer a tower view option? 0.7.8 could toggle from
pilot to chase to tower view, I believe. 0.7.9 does not seem to
have this feature.
I think you're mistaken. FlightGear has never had a tower
..for flight in other atmospheres (Mars, Venus, Jupiter, or in
fluids like water), which atmosphere model is easier to work from?
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
I started work some time ago on making JSBSim accept a different gravity
model. This was specifically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:46:11PM -0500, David Megginson wrote:
I'd suggest something like this:
/environment/cloud-layer[0]/enabled
/environment/cloud-layer[0]/type
I'll stick to /environment/clouds/layer[n] for now. There's more
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:00:35AM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Exceptions are simply broken in gcc around version 2.95.2, they don't
work across modules.
Oh. Cute. Does gcc 3 support this feature as well?
Of course, one could work around
Jon wrote:
There is one in the works for JSBSim, at least
Ah - excellent news!
Jon
Bye bye,
Wolfram.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
* Martin van Beilen -- Saturday 23 February 2002 18:30:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:00:35AM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Exceptions are simply broken in gcc around version 2.95.2, they don't
work across modules.
Oh. Cute. Does gcc 3 support this feature as well?
I don't know, but I'm
#define SERV_HOST_ADDR your_NIC_address for the machine running fgfs.
As I see it, I've to hard code the NIC at build time, right? This might be
a pity for people like me sitting on a (home) network with dynamically
assigned addresses (DHCP).
The address of your loopback interface should
David Megginson writes:
I'm having a mental block right now, and would appreciate help on a
simple question. How do I rotate an object (in raw OpenGL or
preferable, plib/ssg) around a point other than the origin? Do I have
to transform the object to the origin, rotate it, then transform
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:51:31PM -0500, David Megginson wrote:
Yes, I agree that bug-swatting is also important. We should aim to
have 0.8 build clean with -Wall (under G++), and run clean with all
Is someone working on the warning cleanups? If not, I'll have a try at
it.
Petru
Martin van Beilen writes:
Removal is a bit of a problem though. In the current situation
properties are created for life. We could just leave unused
nodes, or I could add a delChild() method, or I could add it to
the destructor. What do you think?
Properties exist for life because any
Curtis L. Olson writes:
It's been a while, but as I recall you probably want translate the
object to the origin (or have it start out there) do whatever
combination of rotations to orient it properly, and then translate it
to it's final location.
Yes, that's what I ended up doing. It
There seems to be a vestigial reference to TOWER_VIEW in
0.7.9, but as Michael says, the code section that was in
0.7.8 is no longer there. This would be a useful feature
for simulating r/c flight.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Michael Selig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 06:16:19PM -0500, David Megginson wrote:
Properties exist for life because any number of different modules
might be holding pointers to them. We'll have to figure out some kind
of management scheme if we want node
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, David Megginson wrote:
Christian -- I'm developing my own weather DB in a separate stream
(--with-new-environment) partly to give you and others a chance to
integrate your code. If you can tie it in to the rest of FlightGear
(including the FDMs), I'll happily stop my
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Selig) [2002.02.23 13:32]:
At 2/23/02, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boslough, Mark B) [2002.02.22 18:40]:
Is there no longer a tower view option? 0.7.8 could toggle from
pilot to chase to tower view, I believe. 0.7.9 does not seem to
have this feature.
Boslough, Mark B writes:
There seems to be a vestigial reference to TOWER_VIEW in
0.7.9, but as Michael says, the code section that was in
0.7.8 is no longer there. This would be a useful feature
for simulating r/c flight.
There was never any code to support it; Curt just added it to
Martin van Beilen writes:
Well, that's the easy part. We can add a DELETE flag and set it
on all dynamic properties. I'm more worried about multithreading.
It may be necessary to implement a locking scheme to prevent
simultaneous access and deletion of a property. (Only if DELETE
is
There seems to be a vestigial reference to TOWER_VIEW in
0.7.9, but as Michael says, the code section that was in
0.7.8 is no longer there. This would be a useful feature
for simulating r/c flight.
There was never any code to support it; Curt just added it to the enum
as a bit of
At 2/23/02, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Selig) [2002.02.23 13:32]:
At 2/23/02, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boslough, Mark B) [2002.02.22 18:40]:
Is there no longer a tower view option? 0.7.8 could toggle from
pilot to chase to tower view, I believe. 0.7.9 does not
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Selig) [2002.02.23 20:08]:
At 2/23/02, you wrote:
Michael,
You had to have put that there yourself because that was never committed
to CVS (I know...I wrote it). It works, but it's a major hack and
shouldn't be in the official FG source (IMHO).
Someone needs
John Wojnaroski wrote:
On the 747 YASim model, have not been able to slow to a resonable
approach speed 150kts and maintain altitude, run out of elevator
authority around 184 kts and flap settings seem to have no effect. The
numbers I have in my 747 flight manual don't match up with what
Andy Ross writes:
Undeniably. Unfortunately, the only way to get it closer is to have
people work on and provide feedback for the models. I'll freely admit
that I don't spend much time in the 747 model, because big jets don't
push my buttons.
Jim Brennan, could probably rattle off 747
On Saturday 23 February 2002 10:24 pm, you wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
Undeniably. Unfortunately, the only way to get it closer is to have
people work on and provide feedback for the models. I'll freely admit
that I don't spend much time in the 747 model, because big jets don't
push my
Andy Ross writes:
Undeniably. Unfortunately, the only way to get it closer is to have
people work on and provide feedback for the models. I'll freely admit
that I don't spend much time in the 747 model, because big jets don't
push my buttons.
Jim Brennan, could probably rattle off
42 matches
Mail list logo
