Apparently something has changed w/ the z-placement of the model on the
runway. With the recent CVS, my models are now sitting below the runway
and I can only see (sometimes) the tops of the airplanes. In my
*-model.xml files, this was working:
offsets
z-m-.2/z-m
x-m-.6/x-m
At 4/10/02, you wrote:
Apparently something has changed w/ the z-placement of the model on the
runway. With the recent CVS, my models are now sitting below the runway
and I can only see (sometimes) the tops of the airplanes. In my
*-model.xml files, this was working:
offsets
z-m-.2/z-m
but 2.0 is in part a 'rconciliation' of the various 'propriatary' extensions
and the inclusion of things that almost all of the manufacturers have done
to support M$oft DX#. And this driver has more of these upcoming features
then any of the previous ones.
So this driver is Nvidia's tool to
Did we lose the stall horn somewhere along the way? It seems to be
missing from the default C172.
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota
YEah, well knowing Austin, I'm going to avoid any flight piloted by
someone trained on his software. I'll live longer that way.
g.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Cameron Moore wrote:
Looks like X-Plane beat us to the punch, but I'm still impressed.
http://www.x-plane.com/FTD.html
--
Cameron Moore
...
Cannot open file: /usr/local/lib/FlightGear/Scenery/Objects.txt
Initializing splash screen
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 1748)]
fgReshape (width=1024, height=768) at main.cxx:1243
1243
Alex,
Make sure you have the latest base package ... I think some default
properties changed. I don't think this should lead to a segfault, but
apparently it does ...
Curt.
Alex Perry writes:
...
Cannot open file: /usr/local/lib/FlightGear/Scenery/Objects.txt
Initializing splash screen
Alex Perry wrote:
I've never noticed it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. For
most throttle transients, the combination of prop momentum, throttle
pump and induction system effects will hide the blade stall
transition. Especially true if you have a controllable prop.
Have
Michael Selig wrote:
I can ask this differently. What sets the height above the runway of
the hud-ladder target spot (wrt the 3D model view) --- ie the center
spot? For c310-yasim and c172-larcsim, it's above the runway. For
UIUC models, it's below the runway (a recent change).
Where
It is gradual. In fact, if you think about it, it has to be. A
propeller that presented the same AoA at every point along the blade
would have to change its degree of twist as the advance ratio changed.
I was just wondering whether the twist happened to correspond to the
AOA-plus-advance so
At 4/10/02, you wrote:
Michael Selig wrote:
I can ask this differently. What sets the height above the runway of
the hud-ladder target spot (wrt the 3D model view) --- ie the center
spot? For c310-yasim and c172-larcsim, it's above the runway. For
UIUC models, it's below the runway (a
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Did we lose the stall horn somewhere along the way? It seems to be
missing from the default C172.
As long as we're bitching, I've noticed the slight nosewheel-bouncing
(during the takeoff run) are producing loud squeals again.
All the best,
David
--
David
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Did we lose the stall horn somewhere along the way? It seems to be
missing from the default C172.
As long as we're bitching, I've noticed the slight nosewheel-bouncing
(during the takeoff run) are producing loud squeals again.
I
Again, thanks everyone,
w00T! Congrats David!
g.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Do you notice that : with the modified KSFO.btg.gz provided by Curt to
demonstrate runway light and the 3d cockpit, you can see the light points
thru the panel !
-Fred
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederic Bouvier writes:
Do you notice that : with the modified KSFO.btg.gz provided by Curt to
demonstrate runway light and the 3d cockpit, you can see the light points
thru the panel !
Yes. I also noticed that you cannot see the runway lights through the
translucent propeller disk
From: Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the newly trimmed C172 behaves much better it is almost flyable
again. :-)
Almost? What are the remaining caveats? Besides, that is,
no propeller drag at the higher airpseeds and propeller
overspeeds?
Andy Ross writes:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I originally did a *very* simplistic model of wheel spin down. This
was for the purpose of audio effect only and had nothing to do with
modeling actual ground behavior.
Do you want
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Sorry, 'almost' is a figure of speech. My cultural heritage doesn't
allow me to get too excited about anything. I wouldn't want to make a
scene and stand out. :-)
That's why Minnesota elected its current governor, I guess.
It's the
Frederic Bouvier writes:
The c172 is flyable now but I thing the stall don't reproduce the
real behaviour. I thing it should dive more frankly. Now it seems
to stay flat !
My changes shouldn't affect the stall, except for any roll component.
I've read that the C172 often stalls very
Frederic Bouvier writes:
I don't know how a scene is drawn now but by drawing :
1. the scenery,
2. the lights,
3. the cockpit,
4. the panel.
in that order, we should avoid this kind of anomaly.
Am I missing something ?
If we draw the outside scenery followed by the 3d model / panel
From: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederic Bouvier writes:
The c172 is flyable now but I thing the stall don't reproduce the
real behaviour. I thing it should dive more frankly. Now it seems
to stay flat !
My changes shouldn't affect the stall, except for any roll component.
From: Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederic Bouvier writes:
I don't know how a scene is drawn now but by drawing :
1. the scenery,
2. the lights,
3. the cockpit,
4. the panel.
in that order, we should avoid this kind of anomaly.
Am I missing something ?
If we draw the
Frederic Bouvier writes:
From: Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederic Bouvier writes:
I don't know how a scene is drawn now but by drawing :
1. the scenery,
2. the lights,
3. the cockpit,
4. the panel.
in that order, we should avoid this kind of anomaly.
Am I
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:43:03 +0200
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the JSBsim model, I don't see the decrease of AoA at stall. Instead,
the plane keeps it AoA with the stick completely pulled. It does not
swivel around its CG like a real plane !
I'll try and have a look this
Yep, that apparently fixed it.
Curt said:
Make sure you have the latest base package ... I think some default
properties changed. I don't think this should lead to a segfault, but
apparently it does ...
Alex Perry writes:
...
Cannot open file:
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Frederic Bouvier writes:
I don't know how a scene is drawn now but by drawing :
1. the scenery,
2. the lights,
3. the cockpit,
4. the panel.
in that order, we should avoid this kind of anomaly.
Am I missing something ?
If we draw
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:43, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
From: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederic Bouvier writes:
The c172 is flyable now but I thing the stall don't reproduce the
real behaviour. I thing it should dive more frankly. Now it seems
to stay flat !
My
Jon S Berndt writes:
I'll try and have a look this evening, but Tony's probably
the better one to look at this. But, IIRC he's very busy
this week.
Basically, Frederic's loosing elevator authority before he loses lift.
I don't have my C172 POH yet (the flying club usually has students
Curt,
The new default properties set up the various views. So the problem is if
running the new code, and none is defined there would be no view to access.
I'm going to submit some patches that consolidate some of the matrix math for
models and views, which included some patches to the view
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 04:26 pm, you wrote:
Again, thanks everyone,
w00T! Congrats David!
g.
Hear hear
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:22:41 -0400,
John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 04:26 pm, you wrote:
Again, thanks everyone,
w00T! Congrats David!
g.
Hear hear
..we have him hooked now. ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've signed up for ground school and for more lessons and
have joined the Ottawa Flying Club as a student member (about US
$60/year) -- I'll introduce them to FlightGear when I'm better
established.
Yep, your in it now. Congratulations!
Best,
Jim
With the latest updates to CVS, MSVC is having problems.
c:\flightgear\src\main\location.hxx(96) : error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'float [4][4]' to 'const float ()[4][4]'
Reason: cannot convert from 'float [4][4]' to 'const float [4][4]'
There is no context in which this conversion
Jonathan on those four lines (thats all there is) change the text from
sgMat4 get... to sgVec4 * get If you bring up lines 96-99 you'll see
where the change is required.
Sorry about that. I should be able to get a patch done sometime tomorrow.
Best,
Jim
Jonathan Polley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
35 matches
Mail list logo
