dene maxwell wrote:
I regret any offence I may have caused you. Given that this not the first
time I have caused you personal offence. After careful consideration I feel
it is prudent that I hang up the keyboard on the developer lists, at least
until such time as I can afford hardware that
Hi Chris,
I don't disagree with anything you're saying. I don't (and never have) run
3-d cockpits, I believe my hardware setup is too primative to support them.
This is not the fault of FG, it is a probelm I am saving up to remedy. You
are right;
I can't run 3-d cockpits.
I run 098a binary
dene maxwell wrote:
From: Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A separate A-10-3Dcockpit would make the existing A-10 redundant
- who would want to fly it without your cockpit? :)
Maybe those langishing on 098a? From what I've seen of Alexis cockpit, I
would love to fly it with his cockpit, as I
dene maxwell wrote:
I would hate to see a aircraft that works under 098a and perhaps earlier
that is enjoyed by many users overwritten and possibliy become
unavailable.
Nobody holds you back from keeping a copy of the old aircraft
implementation, you just don't get all the new featuers,
Lee Elliott a écrit :
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote:
I'll do that ASAP, maybe sunday night or monday.
I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff to the
A-10, your name and comments to the existing files, especially the
author tag in the A-10-set.xml
On Sunday 26 February 2006 12:09, alexis bory wrote:
Lee Elliott a écrit :
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote:
I'll do that ASAP, maybe sunday night or monday.
I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff
to the A-10, your name and comments to the
Chris Metzler wrote:
Sorry, I'm feeling really slow (probably because it's late where I am,
and
I should go to sleep). There was a change in JSBSim configuration file
format in going to JSBSim 2.0; that has caused a lot of aircraft that
haven't yet been updated to not run under FG 0.9.9, and
dene maxwell wrote:
If I chose to stay with the old version front end then I could still
expect the functionality I had enjoyed to still be available. This is
not the case with 098a MP. 098a MP no longer exists and having
supported a household upgrade to cable 'net on the basis of being able
Chris wrote:
To what little I understand, I agree completely that changes were
good. But from the FlightGear perspective, one could have imagined
different ways of dealing with old-style config files. For example, one
could have imagined a parser which detected the config file style, and
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Anyhow, I'll keep this in mind and maybe I can add some of these
suggestions. But, I have noticed that sometimes when error messages are sent
to the console, the user doesn't look for those, anyhow. SimGear also hides
the messages that JSBSim normally puts out to prevent
Erik wrote:
FlightGear should always display messages when it is labeled alert.
Maybe there is a log-level mismatch between FlightGear and JSBSim?
Here's the controlling code in JSBSim.cxx:
switch (logbuf::get_log_priority()) {
case SG_BULK:
FGJSBBase::debug_lvl =
On Sunday 26 February 2006 06:13, dene maxwell wrote:
Hi Chris,
I don't disagree with anything you're saying. I don't (and never have) run
3-d cockpits, I believe my hardware setup is too primative to support them.
This is not the fault of FG, it is a probelm I am saving up to remedy. You
are
@lists.sourceforge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:09:47 +0100
Lee Elliott a écrit :
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote:
I'll do that ASAP, maybe sunday night or monday.
I can't
to provide valid
comments in the context of new developments.
Regards
Dene
From: Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:42:50
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote:
Lee Elliott a écrit :
On Friday 24 February 2006 21:11, alexis bory wrote:
10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :)
How are those folk who like flying the A-10 getting on with
the current version in cvs?
OK, Martin said quite the
alexis bory wrote:
I'd like to upload some thing clean ( shall I upload to
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/incoming/ ? )
Sorry, no, this upload directory is for scenery models only as I don't
write to the CVS tree (except from changes to The Manual),
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
Hi Lee,
From: Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote:
Lee Elliott a écrit :
On Friday 24 February 2006 21:11, alexis bory wrote:
10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :)
How are those folk who like flying the A-10 getting on with
the
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:16:51 +1300
dene maxwell wrote:
From: Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff to
the A-10, your name and comments to the existing files,
especially the author tag in the A-10-set.xml file and send it
to one of the cvs
On Saturday 25 February 2006 19:25, Lee Elliott wrote:
I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff to
the A-10, your name and comments to the existing files,
especially the author tag in the A-10-set.xml file and send it
to one of the cvs maintainers.
A separate
Hi Chris,
agreed, 3-D is not a 099 peculiarity... but I can't run 3-D cockpits under
my implementation of 098a, I've put this down to hardware restrictions and
it hasn't been important as there are plenty of options in the way of
equally enjoyable aircraft.
Some of the new aircraft are
alexis bory wrote:
10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :)
I'dd suggest you to already submit those parts that you consider to be
in a useful state - even if the whole cockpit is still not complete,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 06:29, Martin Spott wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
However, if people are flying it and liking it I don't want
to break it for them, so it would be handy if people could
let me know if they're using cvs FG or the last official
release,
I've almost always been
Jim Wilson a écrit :
Did anybody asked about a way to keep the hud's marks inside the
hud screen ?
Alexis, this looks very promising. You probably do not want to try
and use the current HUD for this purpose. Your best bet is to
develop a 3D model of a HUD and manipulate the markings and
Martin Spott a écrit :
The green radomes on your screenshot, are these part
of our standard scenery ?
No, I did just begin to add some models to my own scenery, thanks to
fred's tools. I have to figure out how to add them in the FlightGear
Scenery Database.
I also plan to build some monuments
alexis bory wrote:
Martin Spott a écrit :
The green radomes on your screenshot, are these part
of our standard scenery ?
No, I did just begin to add some models to my own scenery, thanks to
fred's tools. I have to figure out how to add them in the FlightGear
Scenery Database.
Send them to
On Monday 06 February 2006 23:14, alexis bory wrote:
Martin Spott a écrit :
alexis bory wrote:
Before going farther I'd like to know if any body else
allready do the same work.
Lee Elliott did the A-10, you'd probably ask him to
coordinate the effort. I'd love to see a nice copckpit
Lee Elliott wrote:
However, if people are flying it and liking it I don't want to
break it for them, so it would be handy if people could let me
know if they're using cvs FG or the last official release,
I've almost always been using CVS.
I honour your intention not to break anything, on
Martin Spott a écrit :
alexis bory wrote:
Before going farther I'd like to know if any body else allready do
the same work.
Lee Elliott did the A-10, you'd probably ask him to coordinate the
effort. I'd love to see a nice copckpit for the A-10 because I find
it's much fun to fly that
alexis bory wrote:
Did anybody asked about a way to keep the hud's marks inside the hud
screen ?
There isn't a good way to do it right now. The current HUD code is
very old, and predates the 3D cockpits. It just draws directly to the
screen (with a matrix hack to make it appear in the correct
alexis bory wrote:
Did anybody asked about a way to keep the hud's marks inside the hud
screen ?
If you are talking about the HUDs controlled by the 'h' key, I don't
know the answer but I know it can be done so long as you want to
constrain them to a rectangle. If you are talking about the
Andy Ross wrote:
There isn't a good way to do it right now. The current HUD code is
very old, and predates the 3D cockpits. It just draws directly to the
screen (with a matrix hack to make it appear in the correct 3D
orientation) with no clipping at all.
The HUD is one of the very
I've got an idea. What if we would have the background of a regular 2D / 3D instrument transparent or translucent, and arrange the layout like HUD, and laid over on the screen ? I bet we can make the attitude / airspeed / alt / vsi gauges to only display the numbers without the ticks and the
I just can't wait to show a screenshot:
http://croo.murgl.org/img/very-begining.jpg
It's the very begining of the work, I hope it will be usable by most
people.
Brilliant!!!... The A10 is my favourite jet AC... the canopy and the start
of the instrumentation looks great...
... great links
33 matches
Mail list logo
