Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-11-02 Thread John Denker
I am consistently getting the following error message at the end of every FGFS run: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 719: _dl_close: Assertion `map-l_init_called' failed! This is with a version freshly pulled from git://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear This has been going on for a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-30 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Stuart, Stuart Buchanan wrote: DurkTalsma wrote: FWIW, I would like to build a minimum base package this time, which only consists of one aircraft, no AI, and a minimal set of shared models. AI and other aircraft can be released as a separate ADDON packages, or via CVS. Likewise,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-30 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Martin Spott wrote: Stuart Buchanan wrote: DurkTalsma wrote: FWIW, I would like to build a minimum base package this time, which only consists of one aircraft, no AI, and a minimal set of shared models. AI and other aircraft can be released as a separate ADDON packages, or via

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-12 Thread Stuart Buchanan
DurkTalsma wrote: FWIW, I would like to build a minimum base package this time, which only consists of one aircraft, no AI, and a minimal set of shared models. AI and other aircraft can be released as a separate ADDON packages, or via CVS. Likewise, shared models are now maintained via

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:13:51 + (GMT), Stuart wrote in message 305052.62106...@web26005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com: DurkTalsma wrote: FWIW, I would like to build a minimum base package this time, which only consists of one aircraft, no AI, and a minimal set of shared models. AI and other

[Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-11 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Folks, Just wondering: Suppose we're aiming for another release by the end of the year, would it be feasible to go ahead with our original plan and release a 1.9.2-beta version just before FSWeekend? We've seen are few relatively major code overhauls in the recent past, so if we do continue

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-11 Thread Erik Hofman
Durk Talsma wrote: Hi Folks, Just wondering: Suppose we're aiming for another release by the end of the year, would it be feasible to go ahead with our original plan and release a 1.9.2-beta version just before FSWeekend? We've seen are few relatively major code overhauls in the recent

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-11 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Erik Hofman wrote: Sounds good, but this requires the audio direction code to be functional. I'll try to get it working this week. Hi Erik, Sorry to put more work on you, but it would be good if JSBSim could be updated to JSBSim/CVS too. Some piston engine configurations

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-11 Thread Erik Hofman
Ron Jensen wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:56 +0200, Durk Talsma wrote: Hi Folks, call for a feature freeze by say mid-October (that would be, ahem, next weekend). I would love to see JSBSim synced before the feature freeze... There are some tweaks to the piston code; ram-air, better

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-11 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Durk, Durk Talsma wrote: FWIW, I would like to build a minimum base package this time, which only consists of one aircraft, no AI, and a minimal set of shared models. AI and other aircraft can be released as a separate ADDON packages, or via CVS. Likewise, shared models are now

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Towards release 1.9.2

2009-10-11 Thread Tim Moore
On 10/11/2009 08:56 PM, Durk Talsma wrote: Hi Folks, Just wondering: Suppose we're aiming for another release by the end of the year, would it be feasible to go ahead with our original plan and release a 1.9.2-beta version just before FSWeekend? We've seen are few relatively major code