On Friday 18 August 2006 00:42, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Interesting. I ran a test earlier today with the OV-10 sitting on the
runway in JSBSim standalone. It's just sitting there. So, I wonder if there
is a problem in the interaction with FlightGear, somehow? Does anyone else
see this?
Yes...
Yes... the Lightning also suffers from this jitter when the
parking brake is
applied. It's not as bad as with previous versions of JSBSim
(where it could
rapidly escalate and flip the whole plane over) but it's there and a bit
annoying.
I haven't played that much with the gear constants -
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Thursday 17 August 2006 07:48:
From my point of view this is a total misfeature.
And from my point of view it is a misfeature to bolt the pilot's
head on the fuselage, which is what it looks and feels like with
the old static view -- on a helicopter more so than on a fixed
* Martin Spott -- Thursday 17 August 2006 12:33:
I find it very irritating to have someone else moving my view direction
in the simulator. You're right, this somehow resembles real live,
Bingo. If we walk, or drive, or fly, or jump from branch to branch in a
tree -- we don't experience
On Thursday 17 August 2006 00:51, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Matthias Boerner -- Thursday 17 August 2006 00:15:
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:30, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Matthias Boerner -- Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:27:
Shouldn't the old style of view the default property and the
new
On Thursday 17 August 2006 08:35, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
---snip
It was too tempting. It's OK for non-developers to lurk on a development
list, it's also OK for them to criticize developers, but demanding
justification from those who do the work is a bit too much. Or was too
much yesterday
Hi,
And from my point of view it is a misfeature to bolt the pilot's
head on the fuselage, which is what it looks and feels like with
For my point of view it is an error to end up in a constantly rotating
view. This is what I get if I restart the bo105 after a crash.
Olaf
* Jon S. Berndt -- Thursday 17 August 2006 15:12:
I've adjusted the landing gear values a bit. Can you explain what
you mean by excessive Y acceleration? Is this while sittings till
on the runway? Is it something that happens as you accelerate?
Yes, on the runway and when accelerating.
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:30, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Shouldn't the old style of view the default property and the
new managed-view the one which is selectable?
No.
I would vote for the old stuff too!
Also a generic, aircraft independent, disable switch for that unusual view
would be
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:30, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Matthias Boerner -- Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:27:
how can I turn off the property managed-view?
See the ?-key help dialog for key combinations. Additionally,
--prop:sim/models/bo105/managed-view=0 works. You can put that
into
Hi,
I also prefer the new style. (It's the same discussion as we had in
the mid 90s with hexagon kartell. Some loved this function, some hated
it. At the end it was on per default (my decision ;-) ), but it was able
to put it off by default by a menu entry.
Is it possible to save
* Maik Justus -- Thursday 17 August 2006 00:23:
but it was able to put it off by default by a menu entry.
This is already possible. See View-Toggle dynamic cockpit view.
You need a recent CVS version for that, though ... not older than
... 3 minutes. :-)
Is it possible to save
Hi,
On Thursday 17 August 2006 00:23, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi,
I also prefer the new style. (It's the same discussion as we had in
the mid 90s with hexagon kartell. Some loved this function, some hated
it. At the end it was on per default (my decision ;-) ), but it was able
to put it off by
* Matthias Boerner -- Thursday 17 August 2006 00:15:
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:30, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Matthias Boerner -- Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:27:
Shouldn't the old style of view the default property and the
new managed-view the one which is selectable?
No.
Ok, why?
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 17 August 2006 00:51:
Mathias had the most ridiculous argument: the 100 rich guys with
panorama or multi-screen setup, or head-trackers shouldn't have to
turn it off.
Oh, sorry. I completely got that wrong. This wasn't meant as an
argument why it should *be*
On Thursday 17 August 2006 00:51, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Ok, why?
Because I like it and think it should be active by default. FlightGear
aircraft are property of their creators -- they decide (as long as no
sacred rules are violated). Everyone is free to modify his/her copy,
to fork it, or
16 matches
Mail list logo
