On Sunday 19 June 2011 10:50:01 John Denker wrote:
On 06/19/2011 06:46 AM, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Maybe I've gone wrong somewhere here, but something similar might work.
Also, in situations like a flat spin or tail slide this probably falls
apart!
Let's postpone discussion of exotic flight
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 05:12:31 PM Ron Jensen wrote:
On Sunday 19 June 2011 17:55:25 Hal V. Engel wrote:
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 02:15:54 PM Ron Jensen wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg3
02
08 .html gui.menuBind(radio,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Short version for the impatient reader:
Please do _NOT_ push any major changes or new features to simgear,
flightgear, fgdata until further advice!
snip
Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
to our
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
to our streams. Please note: this includes fgdata, too!
[...]
What's the position on aircraft updates?
They're part of fgdata ;-)
Indeed,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Martin Spot wrote:
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
to our streams. Please note: this includes fgdata, too!
[...]
What's the position on
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:18, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
No, not generally. Obvious fixes are ok, major overhauls are not, in
case of doubt I'd propose that the changes in question should be
reviewed (which is a darn good idea anyway ;-)
Well, I _was_ planning to review the changes. :)
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective
models (c172p, c150).
Comments on the state of the c172 model went unheard for months,
therefore I'd like to hear a really convincing reason why such major
overhaul can't wait until
Hi all,
Stuart wrote:
Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective
models (c172p, c150).
I need to correct that slightly. All I've been working on is a (c172p) new
panel
including the pedestal. There were a lot of faults and missing switches in the
previous
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
Comments on the state of the c172 model went unheard for months,
therefore I'd like to hear a really convincing reason why such major
overhaul can't wait until the tree is open for the next development
cycle.
Not quite unheard - just
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I don't think there's a convincing reason why it can't wait until the next
development cycle, but I was unclear as to whether aircraft were
considered major features.
Ah, well, aircraft are a pretty prominent feature in flight simulation,
don't they ;-)
While we're
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:52, Martin Spott wrote:
This is the first time we're aiming at having one release every six
months and not everything will be perfect on the first attempt. Anyhow
I'm still proposing to let us familiarize ourselves with the
implications of having a release plan instead
I wrote:
ThorstenB wrote:
... snip ...
So, I am really sorry, Vivian, that you were still unable to make the
system work for you - on day 2 (though it seems people only started
trying to use it _today_).
... snip ...
Getting back to the original purpose ... it's worse than I
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 09:58:48 AM Bertrand Coconnier wrote:
2011/6/19 Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com:
On Saturday 18 June 2011 21:00:41 Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Here's an example from Hal's P-51D Mustang. This is from an old version,
so it may have changed by now, but it illustrates the
13 matches
Mail list logo
