On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:39:20 -0700, Ryan wrote in message
1308188360.7422.1.camel@linux-toshiba-laptop:
Stupid question about dual-licensing: Can I dual-license an aircraft
under both GPL2 and CC-BY (no -SA or -NC), and still have it placed
into fgdata?
..if you own it, you decides.
ThorstenB wrote:
But this and other posts today show [...]
This is by far the best characterization of The FlightGear Projects
age-old disease I've ever read,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 07:35 +, Martin Spott wrote:
ThorstenB wrote:
But this and other posts today show [...]
This is by far the best characterization of The FlightGear Projects
age-old disease I've ever read,
As I see it there are two sides to the story, users who criticize too
ThorstenB wrote:
... snip ...
On 15.06.2011 23:30, Vivian Meazza wrote:
And less clever users, which is most of the people out there, won't. I
include myself in that category, since I have failed to make it work
so far.
I sometimes wonder if we really expect the average user to
I think Thorsten has been doing a marvelous job. I see the changes flow by
in the commitlogs emails, and it probably goes unsaid too often, but it's
clear who has been putting in the effort to deal with user bug reports,
tricky bits of code, and a whole host of other issues.
There are always a
ThorstenB wrote:
... snip ...
So, I am really sorry, Vivian, that you were still unable to make the
system work for you - on day 2 (though it seems people only started
trying to use it _today_).
... snip ...
Getting back to the original purpose ... it's worse than I thought. Using
Hudson
There are some valuable features in JSBSim now it would be nice to have in the
release. Could someone please sync the latest JSBSim into the flightgear code
please?
Thanks,
Ron
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's
Am 16.06.11 22:09, schrieb Ron Jensen:
There are some valuable features in JSBSim now it would be nice to have in the
release. Could someone please sync the latest JSBSim into the flightgear code
please?
Does the new atmosphere code work well with FlightGear's atmosphere?
I remember we had some
Does the new atmosphere code work well with FlightGear's atmosphere?
I remember we had some issues when fg and jsbsim were fighting for the
correct weather values.
But you are right - there are some nice new features we should have in
2.4.0. There will be four weeks starting tomorrow
Hello Folks...
Was wondering if any nice souls will assist clear this doubt on mine...
In YASIM, what does actionpt really refers to?
Is it the point the engines pull the air through? which the point will
be ahead of the engines or
is it the point at back the end of the engine where the exhaust
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, xsaint xsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Folks...
Was wondering if any nice souls will assist clear this doubt on mine...
In YASIM, what does actionpt really refers to?
Is it the point the engines pull the air through? which the point will
be ahead of the
On Friday 17 June 2011 07:17:45 xsaint wrote:
Hello Folks...
Was wondering if any nice souls will assist clear this doubt on mine...
In YASIM, what does actionpt really refers to?
Is it the point the engines pull the air through? which the point will
be ahead of the engines or
is it the
Thank you Emilian and Buck
Ok i tested changing the location of the point to ahead of the engine
and also behind the engine, near exhaust.
Irrespective of the location, looking at the results at the Yasim
solver, i do not see much impact.
Surprisingly i do not see any change to Drag Coef
On Friday 17 June 2011 08:15:36 xsaint wrote:
Thank you Emilian and Buck
Ok i tested changing the location of the point to ahead of the engine
and also behind the engine, near exhaust.
Irrespective of the location, looking at the results at the Yasim
solver, i do not see much impact.
14 matches
Mail list logo
