Dene wrote:
Having been involved with this project I think that part of Arnt's
original post is fuelled by the difficulty in turning TaxiDraw output
into something that can be used by FGFS.
I personally don't care much abount Arnt's concerns, I'm convinced that
he's never ever understood
On 12/23/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still I agree with you that the process of creating Scenery - even
though the technical side is pretty nifty - has some drawbacks when it
comes to handling this process. I think there is some hen-and-egg
problem hiding here:
The
Hi Curt,
Curtis Olson wrote:
On 12/23/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To quote another recent poster ...
... the above statement above is not completely accurate, and not accurately
complete.
You do have some great sounding talking points though.
:-))
Where do you think
And if Oshkosh reconfigures their runways and landing zones for EAA,
..yup, that's what I'm talking about.
are they out repaving the runways and taxiways,
..nope, unless somebody coughs up the funds needed.
are they repainting line markings?
..I dunno if
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:46:00 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
On 12/20/06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
DAFIF doesn't release any new data to the public at all, Robin
releases every one or two months, so there's no real point in
preferring DAFIF over Robin's export,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:42:32 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:46:00 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
On 12/20/06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
DAFIF doesn't release any new data to the public at all, Robin
releases every
On 12/21/06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..agreed, I have a vague idea but not enough to show code. ;o)
And if Oshkosh reconfigures their runways and landing zones for EAA, are
they out repaving the runways and taxiways, are they repainting line
markings? That's the sort of stuff that goes into
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:50:09 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/21/06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..agreed, I have a vague idea but not enough to show code. ;o)
And if Oshkosh reconfigures their runways and landing zones for EAA,
..yup, that's what I'm talking about.
There are many TODO-lists for FlightGear that are floating around on
The Net. One of thesde is the Feature Requests / Proposals / Ideas
page on The Wiki, where someone proposes to load DAFIF into a database.
Because I don't really understand what the author is aiming at or if he
knows about the
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:18 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are many TODO-lists for FlightGear that are floating around on
The Net. One of thesde is the Feature Requests / Proposals / Ideas
page on The Wiki, where someone proposes to load DAFIF into a
database.
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:18 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[my own Message-ID removed]:
Man, am I glad that I'm using an 'inofficial' domainname for writing
these postings, otherwise your ignorance concerning privacy issues
would push my address into every harvester
On 12/20/06, Martin Spott wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:18 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[my own Message-ID removed]:
Man, am I glad that I'm using an 'inofficial' domainname for writing
these postings, otherwise your ignorance concerning privacy issues
would
Curtis Olson wrote:
I don't see what advantage maintaining our own SQL version of a subset of
someone else's SQL database will give us. Faster editing? The file isn't
big enough to really worry about speed. Want to use an sql database with
flightgear at runtime? Better find an embedded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Olson wrote:
Want to use an sql database with
flightgear at runtime? Better find an embedded database tool that is
binary
compatible across all platforms ... and is open source ... and compiles on
all the platforms we support ... !
Well,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:10:47 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:18 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are many TODO-lists for FlightGear that are floating around on
The Net. One of thesde is the Feature Requests /
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:15:11 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:18 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[my own Message-ID removed]:
Man, am I glad that I'm using an 'inofficial' domainname for writing
these postings,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:27:14 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/20/06, Martin Spott wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:18 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[my own Message-ID removed]:
Well, my intention was to remove that item from the
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..any chance we can get full access to the data we need?
It might cover e.g. temporary things like scheduled shutdown
of runways or taxiways becoming airshow runways etc.
Obviously we're not interested in X-Plane specific data.
Where did you spot X-Plane specific data
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:10:13 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..any chance we can get full access to the data we need?
It might cover e.g. temporary things like scheduled shutdown
of runways or taxiways becoming airshow runways etc.
On 12/20/06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
DAFIF doesn't release any new data to the public at all, Robin
releases every one or two months, so there's no real point in
preferring DAFIF over Robin's export,
..precisely why we might prefer an enhancement to Robin's
current export.
What are we
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:46:00 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/20/06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
DAFIF doesn't release any new data to the public at all, Robin
releases every one or two months, so there's no real point in
preferring DAFIF over Robin's export,
21 matches
Mail list logo
