Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-30 Thread Chris Metzler
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:48:30 + LeeE wrote: The oddest thing I found was a reply from Shad Young to Tim Moore where he said My sincere apologies. It was not my intent to offend. The reason I find this odd is because Tim Moore was just pointing out that the conditions of use for a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-29 Thread Heiko Schulz
--- Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Shad, I run google mail so I went back and searched all the email threads with your name in it, and what I saw initially was some good and fair questions from you (the new user.) Then I saw the correct people who knew the answers jump in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-29 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:28:11 -0600 Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Shad, ... So unless all this happened in private email, I honestly don't know where you are getting any of this from? All the discussion on the public mailing list that derived from any of your questions or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-29 Thread LeeE
This was a pretty mystifying post. Like you, and I suspect most of us, I went back through my local postings archive and couldn't find anything to justify it. Incidentally, Shad Young first popped up on the FG lists back in 2003 re a query concerning graphics cards. The oddest thing I found

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:42:28 -0600, Jon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:28:11 -0600 Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Shad, ... So unless all this happened in private email, I honestly don't know where you are getting any of this from? All the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-29 Thread John Denker
On 12/29/2007 01:49 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote: Microsoft is known to fund and get such schemes done. ..skillful trolls would inject such forgeries into especially heated debates to try maximize the conflict, to try run developers off this project, preferably in disgust. I suspect several of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:55:45 -0500, William wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:42:28 -0600, Jon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:28:11 -0600 Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Shad, ... So unless

[Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-28 Thread Shad Young
I have backed out of the commercial project involving FG. Thanks to the attitudes displayed by a few of you here I have no interest in contributing to this sim on any level, nor do I really wish to be involved in this community. Maybe one of you will pick it up. I hope one of you does, as you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-28 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Shad, I run google mail so I went back and searched all the email threads with your name in it, and what I saw initially was some good and fair questions from you (the new user.) Then I saw the correct people who knew the answers jump in with helpful information that pointed you in the right

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preaching to the Bishop

2007-12-28 Thread SydSandy
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:28:11 -0600 Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Shad, I run google mail so I went back and searched all the email threads with your name in it, and what I saw initially was some good and fair questions from you (the new user.) Then I saw the correct people who