Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would see the same traffic.
Note: This is moving into a slightly
Hello,
After Curt kindly helping me to compile Terragear last Friday it was working
lovely well until I tried to do a genapts, I did see on ./configure it said it
needed newmats to generate airports so I read the README.newmats and got the
correct packages and configured them and did another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client
Carroll Barry wrote:
I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed
one
perhaps, in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
Aviation Data Systems (who produce fboweb.com) are listed as a Class 1 ASDI
Direct subscriber on the ASDI website - so they have
Hi Stuart, Thomas, Oliver
Firstly thank-you to everyone so far, some good ideas have been put forward and
It is seeming more likely that this might work.
I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed one perhaps,
in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
Tim Moore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
to
go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or
artificial. And
best of all, flightgear itself does
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:51:40 +
Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems with the following seemingly simple bit of animation
(running the cvs osg version):
animation
object-nameWarnLoVolt/object-name
object-nameWarnGen/object-name
Well I have sorted most of it out! But I am not sure how to sort out the
following -
apt_surface.cxx:345: error: âSum_Squareâ was not declared in this scope
apt_surface.cxx:359: error: âResVarâ was not declared in this scope
apt_surface.cxx:363: error: âclass Matrixâ has no member named
If I manage to provoke fg to go down, I get a rather good
backtracedump - but i havnt been able to see how you make it happen.
I often refer to the gdb batrace function when i want to have the
information - but its kinda problematic when errors doesnt always
appear...(and i dont want to have a
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:30:29 Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote:
Now, second animation not work at all. But some times ago (around half of
year), such code work properly - object has control of last animation .
I don't know - may be, rules of multiply animations of one objects was
changed.
Any pointers appreciated!
Try newmat11 instead of newmat10
Torsten
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files
Hello,
Thanks for that that has solved must of the errors, I am have configured 11 but
I am getting the following error -
apt_surface.cxx:359: error: 'ResVar' was not declared in this scope
Is there something I need to adjust?
Kind Regards,
Will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/06/07 13:32 PM
Any
Am Dienstag, 6. November 2007 16:50 schrieb will Pink:
Thanks for that that has solved must of the errors, I am have configured 11
but I am getting the following error -
apt_surface.cxx:359: error: 'ResVar' was not declared in this scope
Is there something I need to adjust?
This is strange,
Yeap exacty like it
ColumnVector A = U.i() * M;
ColumnVector Fitted = X * A;
Real resVar = sum_square(Y1) / (nobs-npred1);
// get variances of estimates
U = U.i(); DiagonalMatrix D; D U * U.t();
Will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/06/07 04:13pm
Am Dienstag, 6. November 2007 16:50 schrieb
Am Dienstag, 6. November 2007 18:03 schrieb will Pink:
Yeap exacty like it
ColumnVector A = U.i() * M;
ColumnVector Fitted = X * A;
Real resVar = sum_square(Y1) / (nobs-npred1);
Nope! your resVar is lowercase and the compiler is complaining about an
undeclared uppercase ResVar.
I just
Thank you for both your efforts!
It has now successfully compiled out of interest why are they the wrong
characterers?
Manuel Massing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/06/07 05:18pm
hi,
ColumnVector A = U.i() * M;
ColumnVector Fitted = X * A;
Real resVar = sum_square(Y1) / (nobs-npred1);
note
View definitions are supposed to follow these rules for positive
values:
x - right
y - up
z - back/aft
but long ago (2003/02/06) a patch was committed, which swapped
the meaning of x and y axis in lookat mode (that is: chase
views and the aircraft following look from the tower). lookfrom
Hi,
Has anyone successfully compiled flightgear on FC5. I need to do some
development work on COMMS but I can't even get it to run on my FC5
box. The error it gives is something about an ALUT state when it is
still initializing the subsystem.
Nick
I just did it on FC 6, but I haven't tried FC 5.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully compiled flightgear on FC5. I need to do some
development work on COMMS but I can't even get it to run on my FC5
box. The error it gives is something about an ALUT state when it is
still
Thanks,. If all goes bad I'll just upgrade to FC6 or FC7. Do you know
anyone who has tried it on FC7 and got it working.
On Nov 6, 2007 9:17 PM, Lee Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did it on FC 6, but I haven't tried FC 5.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully
I just did it on FC 6, but I haven't tried FC 5.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully compiled flightgear on FC5. I need to do some
development work on COMMS but I can't even get it to run on my FC5
box. The error it gives is something about an ALUT state when it is
still
Nah. I've been putting it off myself. It's always such a painful
excursion into computer hell.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Thanks,. If all goes bad I'll just upgrade to FC6 or FC7. Do you know
anyone who has tried it on FC7 and got it working.
On Nov 6, 2007 9:17 PM, Lee Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 09:25, Oliver Schroeder wrote:
I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
to go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or artificial.
And best of all, flightgear itself does not need any changes at all.
In fact, that
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:41, Tim Moore wrote:
I'd be a bit concerned about the performance implications of this approach.
If the intent is to run this program on the same machine as FlightGear,
then there will need to be a fair amount of tuning to make sure that the
real-time FlightGear
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:22, Durk Talsma wrote:
Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only
need to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways.
These data could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and
perhaps stored locally on
On Nov 6, 2007 8:22 PM, Durk Talsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only need
to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways. These data
could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and perhaps stored
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 06:56, Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would
Flightgear works like a charm on Fedora 7.
Wim
On 11/6/07, Nick Othieno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,. If all goes bad I'll just upgrade to FC6 or FC7. Do you know
anyone who has tried it on FC7 and got it working.
On Nov 6, 2007 9:17 PM, Lee Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did
hmmm... good idea for mp and network.
But it still costs money to have internet and maybe
some flightschools, which want to use FGFS don't want
this because.
I think there should be still a possibility to have
this all on one pc without network.
HHS
--- leee [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG would automatically
start a local process to use if a net or lan server isn't specified.
LeeE
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:17, Heiko Schulz wrote:
hmmm... good idea
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
would automatically
start a
* Melchior Franz -- Tuesday 06 November 2007:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/Main
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv15887/src/Main
Modified Files:
main.cxx
Log Message:
Merge branch 'master' of ../.fg.osg
Whoops, this was an accident with my git-cvs gateway,
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
would automatically
start a
I just did a cvs up -dP for SimGear, fgfs, and data and then compiled
both for the plib branch. There is a strange worble in the sound that
gets worse at high angles of attach. This was not there after a similar
update last weekend. I have only checked the pa24 for this so far.
Sounds on
dave perry wrote:
I just did a cvs up -dP for SimGear, fgfs, and data and then compiled
both for the plib branch. There is a strange worble in the sound that
gets worse at high angles of attach. This was not there after a similar
update last weekend. I have only checked the pa24 for this
* dave perry -- Wednesday 07 November 2007:
Is anyone else experiencing this?
Yes. Must have been one the two subsystem re-ordering changes.
I'll look into it.
m.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still
36 matches
Mail list logo
