[Flightgear-devel] Festical voice volumes

2011-11-24 Thread Adrian Musceac
Hi everybody, I'm almost finished implementing radio propagation for ATC communications, but there's one thing I can't figure out yet: I'm trying to set Festival voice volume to a lower value when the radio signal is near the receiver threshold, but all my attempts using

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas

2011-11-24 Thread Alan Teeder
This is what I am seeing here:- git.exe pull -v --progress origin From git://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata = [up to date] PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029 - origin/PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029 = [up to date] master - origin/master = [up to date] release/2.4.0 - origin/release/2.4.0 = [up to date]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas

2011-11-24 Thread Erik Hofman
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 10:39 +, Alan Teeder wrote: This is what I am seeing here:- git.exe pull -v --progress origin From git://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata = [up to date] PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029 - origin/PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029 = [up to date] master - origin/master = [up to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sounds for AI models (first step implemented)

2011-11-24 Thread Erik Hofman
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 18:04 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 16:04 +0100, Durk Talsma wrote: Hi Erik, I'll try to have a look next week, although admittedly, the relation between the AI models code and the property tree is not really the stuff I'm intimately familiar

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas

2011-11-24 Thread Alan Teeder
-Original Message- From: Erik Hofman Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 10:49 AM To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas I've renamed it to p9X2.nas, I didn't see any reference to it anyhow. Erik Erik Thanks for removing that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Shader properties and dialog

2011-11-24 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Martin Spott wrote: Stuart Buchanan wrote: I don't think there is any particularly good reaon for the dependency, for either the trees or the clouds.  I'm away at the moment but will look at uncoupling them later in the week. Don't forget to pick up your

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas

2011-11-24 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 10:39 +, Alan Teeder wrote: error: unable to create file Aircraft/Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas (Invalid argument) I've renamed it to p9X2.nas, I didn't see any reference to it anyhow. After pulling your change I actually hat _both_ files sitting in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas

2011-11-24 Thread ThorstenB
Am 24.11.2011 23:49, schrieb Martin Spott: Erik Hofman wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 10:39 +, Alan Teeder wrote: error: unable to create file Aircraft/Tecnam-P92/Nasal/p9*2.nas (Invalid argument) I've renamed it to p9X2.nas, I didn't see any reference to it anyhow. After pulling your

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Shader properties and dialog

2011-11-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:01:07 -0800 (PST), Gene wrote in message alpine.lfd.2.00.221600360.4...@grumble.deltasoft.com: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Arnt Karlsen wrote: Starting i.e. b29 and Material Shaders enabled. We can also share the issue in my log, I start with c172p at KSFO 10L and you

[Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-24 Thread Adrian Musceac
Hi there, I'm about to start implementing navradio signal propagation, and I'd like to know from anyone who has experience with this type of radios whether this spec sheet performance is typical for most receivers including airline big iron, so that I should hardcode or not the values.