[Flightgear-devel] Bugtracker

2006-03-10 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi, I just set up a bug tracker for FlightGear at http://his.biologie.hu-berlin.de/flightgear If you want to become a supporter, that is being able to work on the tickets, create an account on the site (via Join in the upper right corner) and write me a PM with your username. The schema of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] *.flightgear.org?

2006-03-10 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag, 10. März 2006 13:32 schrieb Pigeon: As we know, we have some FG docs and tips online written by many people, and then there's the seedwiki site. And now we have a bug tracker (i always liked one btw). Things are a bit here and there, basically everywhere. It's difficult

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bugtracker

2006-03-10 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 10 März 2006 16:12 schrieb Vassilii Khachaturov: There is also an existing bug tracker over at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=583atid=100583 which has been there for several years already; at one point when I looked for a place to write down the bugs that bother me but

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Screenshots of the first few buildinds of the Archeological Scenery project

2006-03-22 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch, 22. März 2006 14:07 schrieb Martin Spott: Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: On Wednesday 22 March 2006 07:40, Julien Pierru wrote: Teotihuacan pyramid complex: http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Teotihuacan.jpg (20m NE of Mexico City MMMX on heading 045); Nice, but we

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Screenshots of the first few buildinds of the Archeological Scenery project

2006-03-22 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 22 März 2006 18:55 schrieb Julien Pierru: well there is definitely a canal down there, not sure if it is dried up or not: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=19.693701,-98.845561spn=0.016544,0.021715t =khl=en Julien P.S:that thred definitely generated some interests, though not the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Use of old maps

2006-04-13 Thread Thomas Förster
... Or put differently: Even though the plaintiff was able to prove the origin of the defendant's map by the easter eggs, that bought them nothing, as the base data is not copyright protected and the easter eggs won't count as mental creation to make it protected. Again: IANAL, and this is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Funny things for a Cessna and a dog

2006-04-21 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 21 April 2006 19:49 schrieb Martin Spott: A very nice recipe on how to fool your dog: http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/Parabel_mit_Hund.wmv Got this from www.eddh.de ? :-) While we are at it, try also this one (!!! 19MB download):

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear on Softpedia

2006-06-09 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 11:50 schrieb Martin Spott: Christian Mayer wrote: Perhaps - but then only with our own watermark, so that everybody who finds them knows where they are from. Hehe, good idea ! Do you know a method how to place such a watermark without requiring Curt to open every

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat changes ?

2006-06-12 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 12 Juni 2006 01:10 schrieb Ampere K. Hardraade: On Saturday 10 June 2006 13:15, Tony Pelton wrote: heck, even taking the records, and stuffing those records, as they are now, into XML would be a start. Already in XML format... http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/export_cyyz.svg

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat changes ?

2006-06-12 Thread Thomas Förster
This idea actually _does_ have appeal - hey, I'm right now busy with creating an SVG drawing - but I see one drawback here: Airport-creators or -maintainers are not _forced_ to think of the logical layout. Let's assume some flight simulation does not honour the logical layout at all and we'll

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat changes ?

2006-06-12 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag, 12. Juni 2006 12:28 schrieb Ralf Gerlich: Hi, Ralf Gerlich schrieb: However, given proper tools - which is what TaxiDraw is going for - we can make the tool support the user, by, e.g., automatically placing lines of borderlights around any new pavement polygon and allow the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Book

2007-01-25 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 25 Januar 2007 02:26 schrieb tangyong: Can anybody translate the book to English?I think there are more people can read English than German language. I could but I don't have the book. From what I've read in the sample chapter there are lots of slips and even errors in it. Looks

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear and IVAO

2007-01-25 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 25 Januar 2007 21:09 schrieb Pep Ribal: lots of HTML please post no HTML mails to this list Thanks, Thomas -- PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology, HU Berlin Tel +49 30 2093 6498, Fax +49 30 2093 6375 -

[Flightgear-devel] Real life flighttracks for some german airports

2007-01-26 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi all, just discovered that DFS (German Air Traffic Control), provides live (delayed 30mins for security reasons) flighttracks for Düsseldorf (EDDL), Köln/Bonn (EDDK), Munich (EDDM), Frankfurt (EDDF) and Hamburg (EDDH):

[Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi, I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying around a bit challenging... ;-) command line: fgfs --airport=EDDT --runway=26L --flight-plan=EDDT-EDDC.plan EDDT-EDDC.plan:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 08 Februar 2007 18:35 schrieb gh.robin: On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas Förster wrote: ... If it is FG cvs with OSG, it is not a surprise to me, i told before on several topics regarding autopilot, that it is not working. Nobody but Lee answered to confirm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG IVAO client (II)

2007-02-15 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 15 Februar 2007 19:10 schrieb Pep Ribal: Sorry, I forgot to post the bitmap... Here it is... Regarding the command-line thing, it might be good to start there. However, what should be the right tool to use when it comes the time to set up the GUI? That is the point in starting

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linuxtag Berlin Building List (was: Custom Scenery generation)

2007-02-23 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 23 Februar 2007 13:16 schrieb Ralf Gerlich: BTW: There was a long list of suggestions for static objects to be built for Berlin on the organisation list. Maybe we should post that to the Wiki for people outside the organisation committee to participate. OK, since I compiled the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Berlin scenery - photos needed

2007-06-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Sonntag 03 Juni 2007 17:23 schrieb Roberto Inzerillo: It's a pity I used non free image files for that one; that's why I can't distribute it. I'd like to distribute it anyway, so I'm asking if someone wants to help by providing a few private shots (regarding this building and a few more).

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Noratlas Nord-2502

2007-06-06 Thread Thomas Förster
OK, just to mediate a bit and prevent 2 discouraged contributors... I think Martin is just trying to prevent history repeating. We once had to remove a model from CVS with great effort. This was good will on the side of the FG community as it was released under the GPL, so we hadn't had to.

[Flightgear-devel] Coding Style (Discussion Proposal)

2007-06-12 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi all, since I don't like spending a sunny weekend in fruitless hidden discussions about refactoring is bad if it reformats code I've put up some thoughts about a possible style guide for Flightgear: CODING POLICY: == File Naming - All filenames are all lower

Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow AITanker.cxx

2007-06-14 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 14 Juni 2007 14:45 schrieb Vivian Meazza: My problem - I only had classtanker/class in my scenario. Not typetanker/type as well. You had typeaircraft/type. The AI code chooses the class used based on type so I had to change that to use the new FGAITanker class. That

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fun with nasal ai

2007-06-28 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 28 Juni 2007 22:02 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: Here's a small Nasal file to play with (attached). If you put it into $FG_ROOT/Nasal, start fgfs with the ufo and press the g-key, then you get a file-select dialog where you can select a parking.xml file. When you click the Load button,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic

2007-07-01 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Sonntag 01 Juli 2007 12:31 schrieb alexis bory: I think this crash is related to the above: Failed to find route from waypoint 8 to 154 at KSAN whithout any other message in the console. FG just quits. No, these seem to be unrelated. The latter happens if the route finding algorithm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic

2007-07-02 Thread Thomas Förster
Thoughts, ideas, objections? Though the property system is probably nice, why not just raise an exception + a catch all error handler. In release code this probably just logs a warning, whereas in debug/development code it exits (could be a commandline option). This works for all subsystems

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar

2007-07-02 Thread Thomas Förster
No callsigns from the Traffic Manager stuff - did we break that? Probably not, never seen any... (so, if broken, not with the wxradar patch) Thomas -- PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology, HU Berlin Tel +49 30 2093 6173, Fax +49 30 2093 6375

Re: [Flightgear-devel] TrafficManager (was: [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar)

2007-07-02 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 02 Juli 2007 15:04 schrieb Vivian Meazza: Good. Phew. No callsign in the flightplans? I think the properties are not updated. Internally they are set at least on loading the xml file. ATM I'm guessing though. I couldn't compare with earlier, since today is the first time I have

Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Dienstag 03 Juli 2007 08:30 schrieb Durk Talsma: The most significant exception (no pun indented) :-) The context of a message also depends on the messenger :-) to this rule seems to be the one related to the routing algorithm. It seems like the new algorithm is pickier than my old one.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Dienstag 03 Juli 2007 10:28 schrieb Vivian Meazza: Of course code breakage happens. But in an ideal world, it shouldn't get into cvs. In an ideal world we had automated unit test that cover everything... Welcome to reality :-P It makes us all look unprofessional. Not more than not

Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Dienstag 03 Juli 2007 10:31 schrieb Martin Spott: Perhaps you recall this thread: C++ code beautifier / Codingstandardsproposal Seems to me that we are just revisiting these issues. I can't remember having read a proposal that found general consensus in the mentioned thread - so I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Coding Style (Discussion Proposal)

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Repost of (relevant parts) of Tim Moore's original posting in another thread to keep things organized :-) With permission Please use this thread for coding style discussions. Thomas File Naming - All filenames are all lower case. Header files end with the suffix .hxx,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Coding Style (Discussion Proposal)

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Dienstag 03 Juli 2007 13:54 schrieb Thomas Förster (actually it was Tim Moore :-) ): I personally hate underscores or any other indication that a variable is a private member, with the rationale that a cursory reading of a well-written class will quickly give you that information anyway

Re: [Flightgear-devel] flight control and trim position popup

2007-07-04 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 04 Juli 2007 15:59 schrieb John Denker: If some developer, for development purposes, wants to increase the number of digits in the display, I parameterized the format so that changing it is a simple one-character edit. http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/flight-control.diff I hope

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to apply different texturing to the terrain mesh?

2007-07-04 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 04 Juli 2007 19:38 schrieb Heiko Schulz: Hi, But I forgot a wish: I would love to see, if we could change and do individuals paintings of the ground of airports - all the lines and markings. Maybe that could be something... AFAIK Ralf Gerlich has done some research in that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Today's CVS

2007-07-05 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 05 Juli 2007 17:12 schrieb Ralf Gerlich: const string would only make sense if a string was returned which is typically stored in the object and should _not_ be copied, e.g. in a getter-method. And exactly thats the case here :-) Thomas -- PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Programming Style (was: Today's CVS)

2007-07-05 Thread Thomas Förster
Sane code would just use a set_element() function and be done with it instead of using a design element that even good, productive programmers don't always recognize. The older I get, the more C++ looks like a terrible, terrible mistake. which reminds me of: The Zen of Python (by Tim

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fancy lvalues in c++

2007-07-06 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 06 Juli 2007 10:19 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: ... Maybe you should stop by in our IRC channel at some time. It's usually much more relaxed and friendly there, and it's easier to clear matters. I second that. I was quite surprised yesterday :-) Thx OTOH sometimes it's not an option

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Doppler oddness

2007-07-06 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 06 Juli 2007 19:27 schrieb John Denker: It's been ten days now with no CVS-commit nor even any discussion of a CVS-commit AFAICT. That's definitely not true (generally spoken). Which branch are you using? Thomas -- PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology, HU Berlin Tel +49 30 2093

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Doppler oddness

2007-07-06 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 06 Juli 2007 20:33 schrieb John Denker: On 07/06/2007 01:50 PM, Thomas Förster wrote: That's definitely not true (generally spoken). Which branch are you using? CVS OSG, up to date as of late yesterday (the 5th). Has something happened since then? Hmm, rereading your post

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Today's CVS

2007-07-07 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Samstag 07 Juli 2007 09:41 schrieb Vivian Meazza: OK so it's 2 features, not 1 bug - excellent. I also noted that the route taken from parking to active runway seemed a bit odd, but then I compared our taxiways to those on Google Earth - we seem to have bits missing alongside 28L, which

[Flightgear-devel] CVS Server problems

2007-07-07 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi all, a 'cvs update' failed for me today: can't create temporary directory /tmp/cvs-serv9314 No space left on device As my local /tmp has plenty of space left (2GB) I suspect the CVS server to be the culprit. Anyone here who can change that? Thomas -- PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] README document

2007-07-18 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 18 Juli 2007 21:56 schrieb AnMaster: I'm strongly against using PDF, loading a pdf viewer takes much longer time and it is harder to edit *.pdf than text files. At least I got no program to edit *.pdf Same here. Automatically creating PDF as an alternative nicer representation is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Push Back operations

2007-08-10 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 18:56 schrieb Harald JOHNSEN: Thank you a lot for the very detailed explanations, I think that I have everything I need for now. Harald, Note that we are actively working on that part (groundnet-AI interaction), so expect changes in the interface of the involved

[Flightgear-devel] Unit Testing

2007-08-31 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi all, I prepared a patch to enable unit testing in FlightGear development. The used framework is UnitTest++ (http://unittest-cpp.sourceforge.net/) which is included in the patch. The whole is completely separate from any FG code, though sitting in src/Tests. testAirportsGroundnet.cxx is the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Addition of true comms in multiplayer

2007-09-02 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Sonntag 02 September 2007 schrieb Heiko Schulz: Hi, Thomas Förster is working on the same Idea - ask him, I'm sure he pleased about help! Not that I know, having no experience with VoIP at all. You probably mean the VoIP client from Holger Wirtz (also from Berlin ;-) ). Thomas -- PhD

Re: [Flightgear-devel] changed runway selection behavior

2007-10-12 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 04 Oktober 2007 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: The last point is done with weighting factors, which are for now configurable in the property tree and might need some more adjustment. Please check problem cases and report any unwanted behavior. I'd prefer the evaluation formula changed

Re: [Flightgear-devel] changed runway selection behavior

2007-10-13 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Samstag 13 Oktober 2007 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: You are a bit behind ... :-) Dang, my last cvs up was 2 days ago. Probably I should setup a 30 min cron job... ;-) Taking wind into account is impossible with the current startup [...] Behind again ... that works already. Look into

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Data preprocessing (was: optimized generic_pylons and .osg models)

2007-10-13 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Samstag 13 Oktober 2007 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 13 October 2007: Caching would mean [...] BTW: (real) caching would be a good idea. But I doubt that *.osg is a big win. It would have to be the native binary format *.ive to make sense, no? And there would

Re: [Flightgear-devel] optimized generic_pylons and .osg models

2007-10-13 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Samstag 13 Oktober 2007 schrieb Tim Moore: My objective is to be able to override model file paths that seem to be hard to change, like those in the scenery files. Perhaps it's easier than I think to update those? How often is the scenery rebuilt? Since this is about replacing(?) scenery

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Programmatic control of AI traffic

2007-11-05 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry: Hello all, I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the moment I am using tracking data from this site: http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Programmatic control of AI traffic

2007-11-05 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry: Hi Thomas, Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control what might be thousands or aircraft? I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using the standalone exe on my pc. Would I be

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Time of Day dialog update

2007-11-29 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 28 November 2007 schrieb Stuart Buchanan: Melchior wrote: ... - unclear wording: Environment Rate: [+][-] What is an environment rate? :-) I thought it was clearer for new users than Time Warp delta. I've changed this to Time Warp. How about Sim Time Rate [-][+][Real

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Time of Day dialog update

2007-11-29 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 29 November 2007 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: * Thomas Förster -- Thursday 29 November 2007: How about Sim Time Rate [-][+][Real Time]. I don't think newbies know what 'time warp' is As said in the other email: I didn't criticize Environment Rate to favor Time Warp. Both might

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Informal version number poll

2007-11-30 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 30 November 2007 schrieb Curtis Olson: ...[lots of version number discussion]... I say it's go time. :-) If it comes down to marketing and a reasonable version number scheme (i.e. one that correlates with the major feature development), why not skip 1.0 altogether. v1.0 has that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft Downloading and Quality

2007-12-07 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 07 Dezember 2007 schrieb LeeE: ...[end user rating scheme is bad idea]... I propose that we identify the different areas of development i.e. 3d model, FDM, Cockpit, flight control systems etc. and then just state the level of development for each of those areas. While this is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to control multi aircraft in FG simultaneously?

2008-01-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 03 Januar 2008 schrieb tangyong: ...(Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems)... A-SMGCS should manage all kinds of vehicles(including aircrafts and cars) on airport.So I need to simulate more than twenty aircrafts moving on the airport surface to test A-SMGCS.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pushback

2008-01-13 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Samstag 12 Januar 2008 schrieb Maik Justus: ...[MP FDM override]... For the pushback we need something similar. Additionally the pushback need to know the gear positions of the airliner to simulate it properly. But all this should be possible in Nasal. I'd like to see the Slave FDM

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Events in 2008

2008-01-17 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Dienstag 15 Januar 2008 schrieb Curtis Olson: If these (or any other events) firm up and we know there will be a flightgear presence, please email me so I can post details on our web site. At least for Linuxtag we're in the planning stages and will definitely exhibit FG. Especially as it is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Shader based random trees and improved random objects

2008-01-23 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 23 Januar 2008 schrieb Heiko Schulz: Oops , now I see a lot of ... Warning:detected OpenGL error 'invalid operation' after RenderBin::draw(,) in the teminal but otherwise it seems to go smoothly ... Cheers -- This message I got the last months with OSG-Builds- I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat runways, taxiways and atc

2008-02-02 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Freitag 01 Februar 2008 schrieb till busch: hi, i have reworked the apt.dat-loading code. everything works fine so far, but i have two questions: 1. we currently have runways and taxiways in one FGRunwayList. imho these are very different things. i'd like to make two separate lists. are

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flying over an island

2008-02-11 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 11 Februar 2008 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: ... Think someone did a conservative choice here. Conservative? http://dict.leo.org/forum/viewWrongentry.php?idThread=427767idForum=3lp=endelang=de Sorry for the long url. Its in German too... At least I think conservative is the right

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flying over an island

2008-02-11 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Sonntag 10 Februar 2008 schrieb Heiko Schulz: ... It seems to mee, that METAR is not used correctly. METAR ssems alright to me, if in RL the visibility is under 11nm, ti is in FGFS too. But above 11nm - FGFS can't show this Note that METAR itself only codes visibility up to m.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] estimating visibility

2008-02-21 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Mittwoch 20 Februar 2008 schrieb Mike Schuh: I wonder if a multiple regression against several factors would turn up anything useful: vis = f(humidity,temp,wind,ceiling,elevation,sun_angle,ground_cover) Not sure how to incorporate sun_angle for values 0 (i.e., night). Moon?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] estimating visibility

2008-02-21 Thread Thomas Förster
Thanks for the processing chain. I'll see if I find some time to look into this in the weekend. Lots of other data processing (ant distributions, butterfly breathing, etc.) on the bench already... :) My main idea is not to develop a complicated model. I rather try to find some complicated

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Frankfurt (EDDF) scenery SVN now available

2008-03-13 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 13 März 2008 schrieb Christian Schmitt: Hone more question: Is there a way to set maximum sizes for aircraft that are allowed on a particular parking position? That would solve the current problem of a 747 parking on at Gate B on a position not suitable for that size. The

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ground in FlightGear

2008-03-31 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Sonntag 30 März 2008 schrieb BARANGER Emmanuel: Hi all, After some tries on the Paris scenery and with nels' help on jabber, here are a few screenshots showing how much a textured ground dramatically improves Flightgear rendering. http://helijah.free.fr/ground/JPG-Version/ Well, for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Screenshot improves

2008-04-27 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Sonntag 27 April 2008 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: * Nicolas -- Tuesday 08 April 2008: After precipitation patchs, I post a new patch about screenshot management. With this patch, you can choose the directory destination for the screenshots. Committed, thanks. Example:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Screenshot improves

2008-04-27 Thread Thomas Förster
Nevermind. I overlooked the simgear patch. Next time, please put a note into the commit messages that a simgear update is required. Thomas - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: source/src/Cockpit hud_rwy.cxx, 1.15, 1.16

2008-05-12 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 12 Mai 2008 schrieb Durk Talsma: On Monday 12 May 2008 15:31, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Is DCL some aeronautic acronym? Or do we now put developer initials in dir names. I'd find that quite disturbing (and not only because Dave certainly isn't the sole ATC author). I would prefer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGPositioned refactoring

2008-08-16 Thread Thomas Förster
James, while I'm pretty much in favour of spatial indices, note that a lot of work in that direction has been done already. As far as I know, Mathias Fröhlich has written a general templated spatial index for simgear. I've the code with me, but haven't found time to look at it yet (Sorry

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 03 November 2008 schrieb Martin Spott: Somewhen in the past we've been starting the FlightGear Expo Checklist page on the wiki (you won't find the page without using a seach engine) Sometimes a little link might help... ;)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: use of boost libraries

2008-11-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 03 November 2008 schrieb gerard robin: ..[boost libs introduction]... Are we talking about it ? http://www.boost.org/users/license.html Which is not said being GPL Not knowing any details, from the website it sounds like things are more complicated: Introduction The Boost

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Best cartesian point class to use

2008-11-30 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 01 Dezember 2008 schrieb James Turner: (following from my recent discovery that Point3D is archeology at best...) What is the 'best' type to be using in new code for Cartesian co- ordinates? Not for rendering related things, where I assume osg::Vec3 is the way to go, but for other

Re: [Flightgear-devel] screenshots for v1.9

2008-12-23 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Dienstag 23 Dezember 2008 schrieb Durk Talsma: Hi Heiko, On Tuesday 23 December 2008 01:43:26 Heiko Schulz wrote: Hi, Here are some of my screenies for the gallery! Feel free to take one or more of them. No. 4 seems to get problems on touch down. Where's the left main wheel? Render

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Git advice

2009-01-05 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 05 Januar 2009 schrieb James Turner: - when I want to sync the main repo with the cvs-import one, your instructions say 'git fetch', but I seem to need to 'git pull' to get the master branch in sync with the origin. It works fine, I guess I'm just mis-understanding what fetch