Kaixo!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 05:17:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
What are those glyphs? (I'm quite surprised, I would have expected the
opposite: fonts generally have more glyphs than the standard encodings of
the sio-8859 family for example)
My definition of language tag is
Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
Kaixo!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 05:17:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
What are those glyphs? (I'm quite surprised, I would have expected the
opposite: fonts generally have more glyphs than the standard encodings of
the sio-8859 family for example)
My definition of
Around 9 o'clock on Jun 29, Jungshik Shin wrote:
IMHO, most problems with Han Unification arise not from using a _single_
font targeted at one of zh_TW/zh_CN/ja/ko to render a run of text in
another but from mixing _multiple_ fonts (with _drastically different_
design principle and other
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Jungshik Shin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Keith Packard wrote:
I'm confused by this; my exposure to Chinese fonts says that simplified
Chinese and traditional Chinese have significant overlap in Unicode
codepoints, but that the glyphs are quite a bit different in
I wrote earlier:
Actually, it is better changed to
if (covers_almost_all_of (GB2312))
font supports traditional Chinese
if (covers_almost_all_of (Big5))
font supports traditional Chinese
It should be
if (covers_almost_all_of (GB2312))
Kaixo!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 09:34:43AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
This goal is reflected in the design I outlined -- fonts are deemed
suitable for a particular language when they cover a significant
fraction of the codepoints commonly associated with that language.
That is
Keith Packard wrote:
Actually, I could really use as many Han fonts as you have, especially if
they are from different vendors and of different ages. All I really need
is the fonts.cache files generated from these fonts; that holds the unicode
coverage and any OS/2 table information. That
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Yao Zhang wrote:
It should be
if (covers_almost_all_of (GB2312))
font supports SIMPLIFIED Chinese
if (covers_almost_all_of (Big5))
font supports traditional Chinese
After sending my prev. message, I read this and I have to
Around 13 o'clock on Jun 29, Yao Zhang wrote:
if (covers_much_of (gb18030))
font supports simplified Chinese
if (covers_almost_all_of (Big5))
font supports traditional Chinese
font does not support simplified Chinese
For a GB18030
Around 20 o'clock on Jun 29, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
A font is suited for a given language when it covers *ALL* of the codepoints
needed for that language.
Yes, that's obviously true, but the problem is that I don't have tables for
each language indicating the required codepoints, all I have
Around 14 o'clock on Jun 29, Yao Zhang wrote:
Sure, I will install as many Chinese fonts as possible and get the
fonts.cache for you. But before that, I will show you serveral lines in my
fonts.cache:
I'm afraid the mailers corrupted the rather long lines in those files, but
given that
Kaixo!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 01:20:34PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
A font is suited for a given language when it covers *ALL* of the codepoints
needed for that language.
Yes, that's obviously true, but the problem is that I don't have tables for
each language indicating the required
Keith Packard wrote:
Around 14 o'clock on Jun 29, Yao Zhang wrote:
Sure, I will install as many Chinese fonts as possible and get the
fonts.cache for you. But before that, I will show you serveral lines in my
fonts.cache:
I'm afraid the mailers corrupted the rather long lines in those files,
13 matches
Mail list logo
