DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 --- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-10 17:25:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Sorry but I don't agree with closing this bug just yet. Whilst its true that Java changed the implementation and that's what causes the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|images |Image codecs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||51465 --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53055 --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2012-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 --- Comment #1 from patc...@portaildulibre.fr 2011-06-15 13:31:15 UTC --- Hello, I have a similar bug (fop 1.0), but it doesn't appear in the version 1.3 of xmlgraphics (fop 0.95). The problem comes from color model associated with the

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-05-04 Thread Ognjen Blagojevic
Hi, To keep issue alive, I reported a bug: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Regards, Ognjen On 19.3.2011 12:30, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote: Jeremias, For this particular image, with Java 6u17 I get: [DEBUG] New ImageAdapter created for key:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51149] 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|Windows XP

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-05-04 Thread Peter B. West
I suppose you have JAI installed in both 6u17 and 6u18/24? Peter West Why do you seek the living among the dead? He is not here, but is risen. On 04/05/2011, at 8:17 PM, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote: Hi, To keep issue alive, I reported a bug:

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-05-04 Thread Ognjen Blagojevic
Hi Peter, I didn't install anything other than regular JDK for Linux. Do you mean JAI library or JAI Image I/O tools? They are both mentioned in FOP docs [1], but from what I understand neither is necessary for PNG image manipulation: (BMP, TIFF) Requires the presence of JAI Image I/O Tools

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-05-04 Thread Peter B. West
Ognjen, You may well have it, depending on where you got your Java installation. I see you're on windows, so it's probably already included. With linux, I used to have to install it myself, but I've been using OS X for a while now, so I don't know about either Windows or linux any more. The

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-03-18 Thread Ognjen Blagojevic
On 11.3.2011 12:54, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote: Having said all this, my proposal is: 1. if someone can help me to track bug further (remember, 1.6.0_17 was working just fine) we could file the bug report to Oracle, or 2. we could just add the info in FOP/xmlgraphics docs that color profile in PNG

RE: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-03-18 Thread Eric Douglas
@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18 On 11.3.2011 12:54, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote: Having said all this, my proposal is: 1. if someone can help me to track bug further (remember, 1.6.0_17 was working just fine) we could file

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-03-18 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ognjen, sorry for the late answer. Could you please set the following log level to FINE/DEBUG: org.apache.fop.render.pdf.AbstractImageAdapter If you get the line Image returns ICC profile: sRGB, default sRGB=true, your PNG is a normal sRGB bitmap. This will (normally) allow FOP to dump the bitmap

Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-03-18 Thread Jeremias Maerki
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: 20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18 On 11.3.2011 12:54, Ognjen Blagojevic wrote: Having said all this, my proposal is: 1. if someone can help me to track bug further (remember, 1.6.0_17 was working just

20x slowdown in PNG processing when switching from JDK 1.6.0_17 to 1.6.0_18

2011-03-11 Thread Ognjen Blagojevic
Hi, (This seems to be JDK issue, but I would like to pinpoint it together with Apache FOP/xmlgraphics developers, since it has significant impact on performance.) I'm using Apache FOP 1.0 to generate a large number of PDF documents (each having 8 A4 pages). Those documents contain PNG