We don't care if it is your name).
Regards
K.
De : Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de>
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 15 novembre 2016 10h46
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
Dear "K. Fossi
On Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016 5:46 AM -0500, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Dear "K. Fossil user",
> it's been said before. Please keep your aggressive attitude and
> platitudes to yourself. You are just annoying and distracting people.
It should be pretty clear by now that "K. Fossil user" is a troll.
Dear "K. Fossil user",
it's been said before. Please keep your aggressive attitude and
platitudes to yourself. You are just annoying and distracting people.
Joerg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
t if you can...
Best Regards
K.
De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 10h58
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
K.
De : Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com>
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 18h38
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Nov 11, 2016 5:28
Best Regards
>
> K.
>
>
>
> De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
>
> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
> Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Downloa
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:24 AM, K. Fossil user
wrote:
> Explain me why a SO serious project could not wait for 10 days or if it is
> not that possible (I don't see why ??), why don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?
Sorry pal, my guess is that the latest sqlite3 was not
ts.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
<ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Beyond that, I don't understand why
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
wrote:
> Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ...
Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while
fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th.
Anyway, I cannot find
lt;fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Mercredi 9 novembre 2016 2h42
Objet : [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit
binary
Just happened to download v1.36 Linux binary off Fossil page to a
Linux x86-32bit box and surprisingly it would not exec
Just happened to download v1.36 Linux binary off Fossil page to a
Linux x86-32bit box and surprisingly it would not execute
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/uv/download/fossil-linux-x86-1.36.tar.gz
Turns out it's actually a 64bit binary:
file ./fossil
./fossil: ELF 64-bit LSB
11 matches
Mail list logo