Re: [fossil-users] svn to fossil-scm migration

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: It should never crash, regardless of any model differences. What version of Fossil are you running?  (What does fossil version say?) Can you send me your repo by private email so that I can try it here and debug the

Re: [fossil-users] svn to fossil-scm migration

. SDR On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.us wrote: I fear that my problem is probably likely due to the very different models between svn fossil (or maybe a less than perfect conversion utility

Re: [fossil-users] Commit question

I believe Ctrl-Z is defined as EOF in ASCII which predates Microsoft. Terminating text files with EOF was the solution employeed by CP/M because file sizes were a sector count instead of a byte count. On Apr 5, 2011 3:06 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:49 PM,

Re: [fossil-users] Commit question

Ah, thank you. I am on the road with barely enough bandwidth to email. At least I was smart enough to give myself an out with I believe instead of stating it as solid fact. :) SDR On Apr 5, 2011 6:48 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote: At 06:37 PM 4/5/2011, Scott Robinson wrote: I

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.us wrote: I believe the glob-style wildcard pattern matching is being performed by mingw during program startup before handing control over to main (because cmd.exe does not do wildcard expansion itself in either Windows 7 or XP

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.us wrote: I believe the glob-style wildcard pattern matching is being performed by mingw during program startup before handing control over to main (because

Re: [fossil-users] crnl-setting bug

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Wilson, Ronald rwils...@harris.com wrote: Confirmed. Single quotes work on Win7. Actually, single quotes don't work either because the single quotes get preserved in fossil: According to http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/compile.html: Filename globbing

Re: [fossil-users] [vb.net] Which files/folders can be safely ignored?

I think it's more a question of how you're using fossil. If you are using it for an actual distributed project, then you probably don't (or at least might not want) to include suo files. If you are using it just for vcs as a solo developer, there is no technical reason not to include the suo file.

Re: [fossil-users] Trac-to-Fossil Was: Wysiwyg wiki editing. Was: Side-by-side wiki editing?

On 15 May 2012 03:01, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Trac's versioning for wiki and issues is native to Trac, and is used solely for the wiki and issues. The version control of the source for a project is entirely separate. Trac does not use your source control choice for issues or

Re: [fossil-users] losing history in private branch merge?

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.info wrote: Shame, I actually kind of liked that individual commits were preserved. Squashing and such was part of why I left Git. History should be preserved, whether you are working alone in private or in the open. History is

Re: [fossil-users] source code file is considered by fossil to be binary.

It might be better (more portable) to escape those as octal or hex sequences (like '\002' or '\x02'). On Jun 24, 2012 3:11 PM, James Bremner ravenspo...@yahoo.com wrote: Richard Hipp drh@... writes: In your case there is a Ctrl-B (ascii 0x02) in the 2150th byte of the file, which makes

[fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

I downloaded the lastest Windows fossil build tonight and am giving DVCS another shot. Some notes: 1. I like the fact that I could --date-override the initial create date stamp. 1a. I wish that I could --date-override a commit at the command line so that I didn't have to edit the date stamp via

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 2012-08-25 09:47, Scott Robison wrote: I downloaded the lastest Windows fossil build tonight and am giving DVCS another shot. Some notes: 1. I like the fact that I could --date-override the initial create date stamp. 1a. I wish that I could --date-override a commit

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

won't involve much or any of the d in dvcs) and the warm fuzzy of contributing to the project in some small way. SDR On Aug 25, 2012 3:17 AM, Francis Daly fran...@daoine.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:47:44AM -0600, Scott Robison wrote: Hi there, 2. I am color blind. The color coding

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.23

I'm not much of a visual/ui design guy but I'll see what I can come up with. SDR On Aug 25, 2012 9:09 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.uswrote: As for the color coding, I was not referring to branch colors, I

Re: [fossil-users] How to save typing when checking out branches with long names?

Just throwing out a couple of ideas: fossil globco 154 Or perhaps slightly less bad: fossil co --glob 154 Though I'm not personally looking for this functionality myself so not having it as an official feature doesn't bother me. SDR On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Richard Hipp

Re: [fossil-users] How to save typing when checking out branches with long names?

27, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.uswrote: fossil co --glob 154 Though I'm not personally looking for this functionality myself so not having it as an official feature doesn't bother me. FWIW: as Richard said, it's _technically_ easy, but brings with it both

Re: [fossil-users] Support for Win9x?

Even if someone is still supporting Win9X, it does not necessarily follow that they are doing anything more that testing binaries in that environment. I would not be heartbroken if such support were removed. SDR On Sep 13, 2012 8:25 AM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

I'd like to assist with that contribution. Assuming someone hasn't already done it by the time I click send. :) SDR On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

I assumed (dangerous though it may be) that leaves anything that isn't UTF-16 unchanged meant don't convert any buffer to UTF-8 if the origination buffer is not UTF-16. SDR On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote: On 13/09/12 21:08, Richard Hipp wrote: [...]

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

, portable conversion routines in SQLite that you can copy. D. Richard Hipp - d...@sqlite.org Sent from phone - pardon brevity On Sep 13, 2012 7:44 PM, Scott Robison sc...@scottrobison.us wrote: I assumed (dangerous though it may be) that leaves anything that isn't UTF-16 unchanged meant don't

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Detection of embedded non-printing characters, especially U+, would be nice. Should we insist on a BOM at the beginning of the file? I don't think a BOM should be mandatory, as it is not required by Unicode. Another

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Csaba Kos csaba@gmail.com wrote: I think now would be a good time to discuss the possibility of a more generic text conversion framework, i.e. not only UTF16 to UTF8 but also SHIFT-JIS to UTF8, and so on. Also CR+NL to NL conversion could be handled by

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancement idea. Was: trouble handling text files from SQL Server 2012

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Csaba Kos csaba@gmail.com wrote: I am a fossil novice myself, but I don't think there is such functionality built-in currently. I was talking about tagging encoding as well as end of line handling, but mainly I was giving myself an out in case I was

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

While I agree that the -Dstrcmp... solution is inadequate, strcmp is subject to the system locale setting. While it might default to the C locale (giving the expected binary comparison behavior), it might not. One may not consider locale the same as localization, but whatever you choose to call

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

And never mind, I guess I was wrong. Not sure why I couldn't have checked that *before* clicking send, but c'est la vie. SDR On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/1/30 Sergei

[fossil-users] Automation

) but I'd be happy to share the scripts and such when I'm finished. Probably the most useful part is just the scripts in the directory that give a front end that enumerates the existing repositories. -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Automation

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: links to each fossil. I have a two line fossil cgi script that gives me access to those repos. I've even created a little page to allow me

Re: [fossil-users] Automation

On May 9, 2014 3:11 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: It doesn't need to be great - it'll just be for my own use. i've never gotten around to using the login group support. I looked briefly

Re: [fossil-users] Location of .fossil Database

On May 21, 2014 9:34 AM, Igor de Oliveira Couto i...@semperuna.com wrote: Dear Fossil Gurus, I'm a new user - have been using Fossil for just over a month now - and I'm loving it. One point that I found somewhat disappointing, is that Fossil creates a .fossil database in my home directory. I

Re: [fossil-users] Location of .fossil Database

BAH! How dare someone make my wordy points while I'm also making them! :) SDR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Location of .fossil Database

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote: i will most certainly attempt to remember that point the next time this comes up. It reduces the argument form Mac vs Windows vs *nix to POSIX vs non-POSIX, which is not only simpler to grasp and argue around, but is

[fossil-users] users table photo column

that is generally usable/accessible? This is mostly a curiosity based question. At the moment all the photo for all rows is NULL so it's not something I'm worried about copying, per se. Just wondering the rationale/workings of it. -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] users table photo column

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: In any case, in the process I was looking at schema and saw there is a photo column in the users table. I imagine it is for a photo of the user, but cannot find anywhere that it is used. Is this something that was added for

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 5/27/2014 22:58, Scott Robison wrote: The best I can come up with for a link to a wiki page (from another wiki page) is something like [Page](wiki?name=Page) which really seems kinda ugly You probably want

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown

On May 28, 2014 2:31 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: {deleted stuff} The attached Fossil repo also contains a copy of the official Markdown documentation. It was included in the test suite, so I linked to it from the repo's wiki, rather than remove it. Thanks very much for the

Re: [fossil-users] DRH's PGCon 2014 Keynote (with Fossil sighting!)

On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com wrote: I just wanted to share Richard's PGCon 2014 keynote for anyone here that wasn't aware of it: Thanks for sharing that. And it was good to hear an entire presentation about SQL without once (that I can recall) hearing it

Re: [fossil-users] DRH's PGCon 2014 Keynote (with Fossil sighting!)

DOH! Ah well, usually it was S-Q-L. :) On Jun 2, 2014 10:00 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: Thanks for sharing that. And it was good to hear an entire presentation about SQL without once (that I can

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com wrote: Consider it yours. Thanks. Final form: OH: To understand Git's design takes 99x more effort than 99% of software. Once you get to that point it's wonderful! // Too true! Curse the 140 character limit! :) -- Scott Robison

Re: [fossil-users] Bookmarks (Re: git-fossil-git does not obtain the same commit hashes.)

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: I really want to steal this in tweet form: To get to a place where you understand Git's design takes 99x more effort than 99% of software. Once

[fossil-users] Links within Fossil

in sync. Thanks in advance for your help! -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Links within Fossil

On Jun 6, 2014 4:20 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: ... is it possible to link to a given line number (range) within a given artifact, perhaps highlighting it in the process? You mean like this: http

Re: [fossil-users] autosync from GUI

On Jun 7, 2014 1:27 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: For the local UI case, sure, i can see it being useful, but people would also expect it to work remotely, and it often wouldn't. When running the local UI,

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

On Jun 7, 2014 1:47 PM, to...@acm.org wrote: Well, I can give a couple of personal examples that you easily try yourselves: * Windows side: Copy/Paste in Windows can not deal with LF endings correctly. Example: PNotepad editor in Windows loads Linux files but copy-pasting from it (for

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

On Jun 7, 2014 12:44 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Years ago (decades ago, actually), somebody rigged up fopen() so that it did automatic NL - CRNL conversions unless you used rb or wb as the type parameter. This seemed like a clever solution at the time and was warmly embraced by

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:40 PM, to...@acm.org wrote: * Several old time assemblers will choke on wrong line endings. Their binaries cannot be updated as the source is no longer available. So, you must edit code only in the right format or you’re out of luck. This seems to be conflating

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, to...@acm.org wrote: I completely agree with the points other than the one that the DVCS is the only tool that can effectively manage the EOL convention of the files. I use a text editor daily that is capable of normalizing EOL convention (though of course

Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: interrupting a commit message

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, This is for Unix-shell users only (including workalikes on Windows)... Here's a time-saving tip which i use very often myself, but most CLI users i know don't seem to know about: It often happens that i'm

Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: interrupting a commit message

On Jun 17, 2014 8:42 AM, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: This thread is hilarious. I thought I was pretty old-school -- I use vi, xterm, fvwm2, and other tools written by my forebears around the time when I was born. I get made fun of by people twice my age for my dev toolkit.

Re: [fossil-users] File contains invalid UTF-8, but is not UTF-8.

be an extended ASCII character from one of the ISO-8859-X code pages. Or it could be real binary data that just happens to mostly have ASCII text in it. I think the best idea is to encode these special characters as escaped sequences whenever possible. -- Scott Robison

Re: [fossil-users] Unusual timeline

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?p=92c2c1e5e18b19c5b05ea5684feb0bbeeb6670fd What's going on here? Everything is tagged trunk, yet [b4a53ba45f] is displayed as if on a branch. Was there a fork or something?

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

, relying on luck to find good people willing to work for sub-market wages. We found some, but it was an exhausting process. -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [fossil-users] Closing fossil output

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo agalys...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I don't really get, a closed file descriptor wouldn't cause corruption, would? btw, i'll use /dev/null. It wouldn't cause corruption in and of itself, but once you close a file descriptor, it

Re: [fossil-users] Closing fossil output

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Alysson Gonçalves de Azevedo agalys...@gmail.com wrote: I understand why one cannot open a database (or any other command) from descriptor file minor than 3. But why this `fossil branch 21` do work and `fossil branch 2-` doesn't, it's not clear. If i open a

[fossil-users] Versionable settings question

reasoning as to why? -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks

it is not)? -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

where large / deep hierarchies of collaborators are at work, fossil is probably not an ideal solution. It certainly wouldn't work in the same way git is used by the linux kernel team. I'll be interested to hear back from him what he thinks. -- Scott Robison

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

server and update the live site, making the generated file tree available (and giving me a live backup of all the files). -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

On Sep 2, 2014 12:10 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: It certainly wouldn't work in the same way git is used by the linux kernel team. Git was originally created by the Linux Kernel team, including Linus. It's

Re: [fossil-users] More on Fossil-v-Git

FYI the Google translation service is reporting that the site is compromised in some way. So no translation at the moment, and I would probably advise extreme caution loading the original site even of you can read Russian. Sorry for top post, sent from phone. SDR On Sep 5, 2014 5:52 AM, Richard

Re: [fossil-users] fossil for web site maintenance [was how to use git to lose data]

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Scott Robison wrote: ... One of my newest uses for fossil is the one case in which I'm using it distributed (even though all by myself): My blog (such as it is). It is not a unique idea at all, but I finally

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

fragile to some people while fossil seems inflexible to others. -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] security notice for _potential_ problem with _some_ CGI-hosted repos

Basic secured site (so now script access until after authentication, and I am the only one with a username/password, at least for now). I'm not too worried about it, but it's good to know that I probably need to go do security updates on my server. -- Scott Robison

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Sidenote: i'm curious why most people prefer postscript addition, when prefix is never slower and sometimes faster. (Not that it matters one iota for a case like this, it just seems to be very deeply embedded in most people i

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

On Sep 30, 2014 9:57 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment issues due to the font on the (s) letter not being a fixed font. i

Re: [fossil-users] Tip: abusing autosync to abort a commit

On Oct 6, 2014 12:26 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, (This just happened...) The autosync option provides (incidentally, not specifically by design) a feature one doesn't have if it is turned off: the ability to abort a commit within a small (and unknown/varying) time

Re: [fossil-users] Tip: abusing autosync to abort a commit

Bah! Commit not conmit. Stupid phone keyboard. On Oct 6, 2014 12:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: On Oct 6, 2014 12:26 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, (This just happened...) The autosync option provides (incidentally, not specifically

Re: [fossil-users] Tip: abusing autosync to abort a commit

I just wanted to give you a little grief based on past -m comments. :) On Oct 6, 2014 12:42 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: I have that functionality without auto sync. I don't use the -m comment

Re: [fossil-users] Tip: abusing autosync to abort a commit

as a TA for the class I dealt with a few students who had the same problem. Students were more apt to blame me (even though there was nothing I could have done about it). :) Anyway... yeah. Not all safety systems are very safe. :) -- Scott Robison

Re: [fossil-users] http --enforce-remote-user

On Oct 13, 2014 7:42 AM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote: On 13 October 2014 04:54, Tony Papadimitriou to...@acm.org wrote: The claim that once you shun a 0-length file you will not be able to commit another 0-length file again is not entirely true. If you first delete the existing

Re: [fossil-users] Hungarian Notation Used in Fossil

. Of course it's sane! :) -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Hungarian Notation Used in Fossil

On Dec 17, 2014 8:26 AM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: The thing I dislike about the strict Microsoft way is the embedding of actual type data into the variable name, so that if you decide to change a type later

Re: [fossil-users] Hungarian Notation Used in Fossil

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: On Dec 17, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: I loathe ... uh ... do not care for ... the embedding of scope or constness. g is easy to justify. It’s a heads-up to the programmer: “Pay

Re: [fossil-users] Compiler warnings

On Aug 2, 2016 9:12 AM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > On 8/2/16, Ron W wrote: > > > > Are there really still compilers in use > > that don't implement C99? > > > > I still build Fossil on a circa-2002 iBook. (See section 4 of >

Re: [fossil-users] false positive UTF-8 test

What version of fossil are you using? Some changes have been made fairly recently that you may not have. On Jul 19, 2016 1:16 AM, "Svyatoslav Mishyn" wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using Fossil to store GPG encrypted passwords; > > and one file Fossil detects as UTF-8: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

ld be possible to estimate where Fossil might > be a reasonable solution and where some other approach is needed. > I may not be understanding you, but from my point of view, it already does what you want by supporting versioned files that you simply never

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Adam Jensen <han...@riseup.net> wrote: > On 09/11/2016 04:42 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > I may not be understanding you, but from my point of view, it already > > does what you want by supporting versioned files that you simply never > &g

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

lly looks bad to someone for not creating what appear to be ordinary file names. If we do support it, Fossil potentially looks bad for creating files or directories that other processes can't interact with normally. I wouldn't mind taking a stab at it if enough people think it is worthwhile, but

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

in a file name is the forward slash. > > ...and NUL, I beleive. > Not to be confused with the DOS/Windows NUL device. :) -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fix for stash-next pointer (fix for the fix)

lf in the foot. :) > Hold on, you mean fossil expects me to read the output to understand the current state and status of commands issued? That's pretty user unfriendly... -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] features I'd like to have in fossil

> If you color lines by meaing, it is easier to understand: Unless you're color blind, in which case it might be impossible to understand. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

more likely that someone will compromise a server with a weak password and completely replace the good repo with a bad repo, or just host a fork that looks legit and get people to pull from that instead. -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

On Nov 11, 2016 5:28 PM, "K. Fossil user" wrote: > > Ah you don't understand again what I've said ... > > 1/ Fossil and SQLite work together, and to be clear, the same guy work for both projects. > I was even told that the AIM of Fossil is to help SQLite. > Do you

Re: [fossil-users] disabled due to excessive bounces (again?)

On Oct 16, 2016 6:35 PM, "K. Fossil user" wrote: > > I am angry because Fossil knows nothing about marketing which is bad for any project... If I may paraphrase, Fossil's benevolent dictator has stated many times in the past that the One True Purpose (TM) of

Re: [fossil-users] Question about the file formats.

On Dec 20, 2016 10:59 PM, "John Found" wrote: Well, the compression is the last thing I am talking about. It is important, but not essential. I am talking about several people working on one file and then fossil merging the changes automatically (of course if there is no

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

I don't know about what commands to paginate by default, but no to versionable settings for this. Don't want to force this on others. On Mar 23, 2017 4:08 PM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: > Good morning, > > I would like to implement the feature given in the title. > I'm

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

On Mar 26, 2017 11:25 AM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: Please find as attached file another patch which: 1. First test for a real terminal before spawning the pager command. 2. No more paginate json command. I see that most of you complain about this proposed

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

On Mar 26, 2017 7:13 AM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: Hi all, First of all many thanks for all your feedback. I come back to you with an implemented solution. After many thinking, for me not all commands need to send their outputs to a pager. Only ones which may output

Re: [fossil-users] Couple of beginner questions

sibly need. You have my word on it!" True story. ;) -- Scott Robison ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] update Fossil performance chart?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:46 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 28 February 2017 at 08:04, jungle Boogie wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This is most likely a request only Dr. Hipp can fulfill has he has >> access to all the databases. >> >> Is it possible

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil interprets plain-text file as a binary file

On Mar 27, 2017 6:44 PM, "Byron Sanchez" wrote: Recently, however, fossil has started interpreting one of these org-mode files as a binary file. Now, fossil prompts with it's binary-file warning each time I update the file. In addition, this file can no longer be diffed in the

Re: [fossil-users] Is Fossil Hash-collision proof?

On Mar 21, 2017 11:04 PM, "Martin Vahi" wrote: I haven't encountered any collisions yet, but I was wondering, what will happen, if 2 different files that have the same size, same timestamps, different bitstreams, but the same hash (regardless of hash algorithm) were to

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-10 20:34, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 2017-04-10 20:00, Scott Robison wrote: >&g

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-10 20:00, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> On Apr 10, 2017 12:48 PM, "Thomas" <tho...@dateiliste.com >> <mailto:tho...@dateiliste.com>> wrote: >> Example of .

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

On Apr 10, 2017 12:48 PM, "Thomas" wrote: Hello, As stated in one of my earlier mails, I also got an issue with files to ignore. I have now created a folder .fossil-settings and placed the glob files in it. Actually, I got a batch file that reads the file filter

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

t seems to have been put in place to check either the file in the repo or the file on the disk depending on what is available. I don't have time to understand it completely, but that seems to be the source of my confusion as to when / where versioned settings are ac

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-11 05:22, Scott Robison wrote: >> >> Perhaps it should be documented, but I don't think it is a bug. It is >> the software doing the job it was originally told to do (track versions >

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:31 PM, David Mason <dma...@ryerson.ca> wrote: > > On 11 April 2017 at 14:34, Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> wrote: >> >> No, it is an explicit command clearly stating the user's desire for >> exclusion of these files *that

  1   2   3   >