It doesn't have ClearCase!!! OMG
-Original Message-
From: Stephen De Gabrielle
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Mar 25, 2011 1:59 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on Hammer Principle
Cute. It seems pretty accurate. IMHOS.On Thursday, March 24, 2011,
Alaric Snell
bump...
-Original Message-
From: Remigiusz Modrzejewski
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 6:17 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] History for a directory
On Apr 1, 2011, at 13:12 , Martin Gagnon wrote:> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at
9:09 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote:>> Rig
I'd say service is good. win-service may be appropriate since this command is
valid only on Windows. However, I'd like to avoid use of hyphen (-) in commands.
I hope this command is automatically disabled (via compiler or run-time) for
non-windows platforms.
> - Original Message -
> Fro
Never mind. I swapped ubg & brbg
> - Original Message -
> From: Altu Faltu
> Sent: 07/23/11 12:01 PM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Automatic branch color selection. Was: Question
> on short-lived branches in fossil
>
> Why does the same branch (tr
Fossil is flexible here. yes/no, 1/0, on/off, true/false any of these can be
used for binary settings. Some settings (like proxy) even can use real proxy
address than on/off. very cool!
> - Original Message -
> From: Wes Freeman
> Sent: 08/04/11 09:32 PM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-s
Ha, never thought there can be fun in this list! :D
> - Original Message -
> From: Remigiusz Modrzejewski
> Sent: 08/05/11 07:07 PM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] [OT] commit command seems to be slow
>
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 15:14 , Stephan Beal wrote:
It is more like a logical process. You want to work on something, create a
branch, work on it and commit. If you have to create a branch when committing,
you will have to remember if this is first commit in that branch or subsequent.
You commandline will also be different for first commit that c
Ben,
Thanks for providing improvements in fossil.
I'd like to share 2 comments:
1. Versioned settings: I'd prefer having all settings in a single text file
with name="value" kind of one-setting-per-line format (although I don't mind a
value spanning multiple lines for readability) rather than o
+1
> - Original Message -
> From: Joerg Sonnenberger
> Sent: 08/13/11 05:01 AM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:42:23PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > You know you can rena
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > >> >> Hash: SHA1
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 08/12/2011 07:10 PM, Joshua Paine wrote:
> > >> >> > On 8/12/2011 1:50 PM, altufaltu wrote:
> > >> >> >> 1. Versioned s
Never mind. By adding a line with 'localauth' enabled admin options.
> - Original Message -
> From: Altu Faltu
> Sent: 08/18/11 10:25 AM
> To: fossil users
> Subject: [fossil-users] localauth question
>
> With fossil df9da91ba8 and localauth unset or set to 0, I observe that:
> 1. If I d
I assume if I de-select UTC, fossil will still use UTC in the database but show
local time zone on timeline.
Correct?
> - Original Message -
> From: Gé Weijers
> Sent: 08/21/11 09:36 PM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Timestamps should be in local ti
Actually, even if I do dnot do git mv explicitely, but move, rename & edit a
file, git somehow detectes it automatically! It shows matching percentage in
git status. I guess it compares missing files with new files to detect file
moves. Nice work!
> - Original Message -
> From: Konstant
+1.
Shunning a commit is a bad idea.
But fossil will not differentiate type of content when shunning so not sure if
it can prevent shunning a commit.
> - Original Message -
> From: Erlis Vidal
> Sent: 10/06/11 12:21 AM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users]
Same here. I like the colorful diff.
But I would like to know (sorry if I missed) what's th eproblem with color sbs
and what are we getting with retro sbs?
- Altu
> - Original Message -
> From: Weber, Martin S
> Sent: 02/03/12 11:03 PM
> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
> Subject: Re: [
+2
Liked both the diffs.
Are colors configurable from skin?
I used following CSS for bsdiff (I find bluish color better than yellow for
changed lines):
table.sbsdiff tr td.added {
background-color: rgb(220, 244, 220);
}
table.sbsdiff tr td.removed {
background-color: rgb(244, 220, 220);
}
table
+1
I faced this a couple of days back and had to perform an incorrect commit.
> - Original Message -
> From: Leo Razoumov
> Sent: 02/10/12 03:39 AM
> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
> Subject: [fossil-users] "fossil commit" failure after merge
>
> Hi List,
> I ran into a strange problem
In ui or server commands, I guess atleast 1 instance of fossil keeps running,
listening to the port. If that functionality has memory leak, it needs a fix.
> - Original Message -
> From: Richard Hipp
> Sent: 02/16/12 06:04 PM
> To: slonik...@gmail.com, Fossil SCM user's discussion
> Subj
Why not just productize limsync?
> - Original Message -
> From: Leo Razoumov
> Sent: 02/26/12 03:03 AM
> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 16:29, Christopher Berardi
> wrote:
> > On Sat
Why not make links (with uuid=trunk) available via skin?
> - Original Message -
> From: Richard Hipp
> Sent: 03/16/12 07:39 PM
> To: fossil-users
> Subject: [fossil-users] Help finding download links. Was: SQLite and Windows
> Metro Style
>
> Email below, from the SQLite mailing list, d
Any changes in configuration will not show-up in timeline.
> - Original Message -
> From: Leo Razoumov
> Sent: 03/22/12 02:54 AM
> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually
> changed?
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 17:17
Won't it be good if fossil checks for this when committing and gives a warning
with y/n selection?
OK. Files having text like "BEGIN MERGE CONFLICT:" will invoke this warning
every time it is committed, but it can be solved by using "BEGIN " "MERGE
CONFLICT:" or os in C.
> - Original Messa
It seems fossil sends POST method to proxy server (I tried fossil pull ...).
I tested git through proxy (socat - proxy:wwwproxy:$1:$2,proxyport=80) and it
works, using CONNECT method.
I'll look at ssl code to see if non-ssl can also use CONNECT method.
> - Original Message -
> From: Gé
Update: fossil does work through the proxy.
Problem seems to be with the proxy, it gives 'bad request' error when user@ is
added to URL in POST method.
I'll work with IT folks for fixing it.
> - Original Message -
> From: altufa...@mail.com
> Sent: 05/15/12 03:57 PM
> To: Fossil SCM use
With help of some scripting and SQL, you can find all UUIDs for files that you
want to remove and shun them. after that when you rebuild, your repo file will
be shrunk.
It is a bit effort though.
> - Original Message -
> From: Stephan Beal
> Sent: 07/05/12 09:15 AM
> To: Fossil SCM use
My proposal is to use an editor that is aware of DOS and UNIX line
endings.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Ramon Ribó
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: __aolWsbDateToL10n__Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:36:47
+0200__aolWsbDateToL10n__
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Developing on Unix and
I'm not much familiar with editors in unix. Are there good editors in
unix that handle \r\n correctly?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Paine
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: __aolWsbDateToL10n__Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:42:47
-0400__aolWsbDateToL10n__
Subject: Re: [fossil-u
I like the local state idea. Then one can export/import them like other
configurations.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: p...@planet.nl
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: __aolWsbDateToL10n__Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:53:55
+0200__aolWsbDateToL10n__
Subject: [fossil-users] Fossil custo
Last time I used vi, it showed ^M at end of each line... does the new version
classify files as DOS/Unix and handles edits correctly?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Stephen De Gabrielle
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2009 1:44 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users]
Great! I verified that vi identifies and edits files correctly - even an old vi
version:
VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3 (2004 June 7, compiled Aug 10 2005 18:47:02)
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Michael Richter
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Sun, Oct 25, 2009 1:28 pm
Subject: R
I wanted to do so on a 150 MB repository and what I did is cloned local
repository to remote server from remote server, using fossil server on local
machine. Then I could do push-pull to-from remote server.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Paine
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-sc
Hi DRH,
Shall I commit these changes?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Venkat Iyer
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Oct 28, 2009 11:48 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] History for a particular file
I am not sure how to get it in, and if it's even worthy of getti
Hi Venkat, Stephan,
This will be very useful. Please commit this command to main fossil.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Venkat Iyer
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 5:20 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Integration into Emacs Version Control
Steph
Hi DRH,
Check-in [0039b7813e] shows a rectangle next to external links in IE and
chrome. Is that intentional? I expected to see some other shape.
- Altu
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:808
Is X-Forwarded-For the solution to login problem through a proxy (ticket
dbf7908517
)?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Zed A. Shaw
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Mon, Nov 9, 2009 1:29 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Server Redirects Really Wrong
On Sun, Nov 0
The Makefile.w32 and the information on Fossil website are all correct. They
assume you have MinGW/MSYS on Windows host.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Clark Christensen
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Nov 13, 2009 5:15 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Noob Win32 build
Me like it too.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Ronald
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 9, 2009 6:54 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Numbered list syntax?
I like it.Ron Wilson, Engineering Project Lead(o) 434.455.6453, (m)
434.851.1612, www.harris.comHARR
My 2 cents. --keep and --force options are intuitive, I would prefer them.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Paine
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 3:15 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] 3 Feature requests - globbing using the repository.
On Wed, 2009-
My intuition says: Use -M|--message-file.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Beal
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 4:19 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Commit failing... retyping commit message
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Hoolihan wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Please commit -M/--message-file changes v r waiting...
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Cowgar
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Dec 11, 2009 5:54 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Commit failing... retyping commit message
Stephan Beal wrote:> i'
Hi DRH, is there any reason content of these files can't be stored in _FOSSIL_
database itself?
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 4:55 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tree checksum does not match
On Dec 15, 2009, at
Well, revert could still be used for reverting selected files but update should
also revert any missing files - that's how SCMs have worked.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Cowgar
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 9:07 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tree che
Very much agree.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Cowgar
To: e...@deptj.eu; fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 7:26 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tree checksum does not match
"Eric" wrote:> >> > What I'd expect if I had deleted a file
from the file system with
Thanks.
BTW, I saw many good changes in fossil last night. I'm pleased :)
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Dec 17, 2009 6:55 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tree checksum does not match
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:43 PM, altufa...@m
I'd also like to switch to https. I don't understand dependencies, etc very
much. Does anyone have recipe to build it with https support on Windows?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: p...@planet.nl
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Jan 12, 2010 5:28 pm
Subject: Re: [fos
Hi Dmitry,
I built fossil with https support on Linux but it keeps asking me about the
certificate even if I accept with 'a' (always). I tried merging trunk to ssl
branch to see if it resolves the problem but it persists.
If I keep saying 'a' to certificate prompts, I can clone successfully.
Request to add Shiny Fossil theme (http://dev.codingrobots.org/p/shiny-theme)
to default set of themes.
Attached is a derived version with some recent changes for menu order /
permission.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users
Sent: Sun, Dec 20, 2009 2
Well, credit goes to Dmitry Chestnykh. I'm just a user of this theme :)
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Cowgar
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2010 7:38 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Please contribute Fossil "skins" or "themes"
Altu,That's a nice skin!jerem
Wait... read this:
C:\>md repo
C:\>cd repo
C:\repo>fossil new actual.fossil
blah...
C:\repo>cd ..
C:\>md waA
C:\>cd waA
C:\waA>fossil open ..\repo\actual.fossil
C:\waA>cd ..
C:\>md waB
C:\>cd waB
C:\waB>fossil open ..\repo\actual.fossil
C:\waB>cd ..
C:\>
There are only three files in waA and w
> As I said earlier, I think you misunderstand how the SCMs you criticize
> actually work. So you are seeing problems that don't exist.
You made very good points. Let's talk once you understand how fossil actually
works...- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Carrera
To: fossil-user
$ fossil open ../fossil/fossil.fsl ssl
$ make
$ ./fossil version
This is fossil version [652f20ef9c] 2010-01-21 22:03:24 UTC
$ ./fossil set proxy wwwproxy:80
$ ./fossil clone http://fossil-scm.org no-ssl.fsl
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Send: 49 1
Hi,
You tried with https:// or http://?
http:// works well.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: paolo lulli
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 7:23 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] https doesn't work through proxy?
It happened to me also not to be able to
Oh.
I have issues with https URLs. Can you please try that and let me know?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: paolo lulli
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 7:50 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] https doesn't work through proxy?
I just tried http .2010/1/
Well,
In my office all communication goes through same http proxy, including https. I
guess they do pass-thru somehow.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 9:02 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] https doesn't w
Well,
In my office all communication goes through same http proxy, including https. I
guess they do pass-thru somehow.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 9:02 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] https doesn't w
As I said, it works in pass-thru mode. here are send/recieve dumps for
following transaction:
$ export https_proxy=localhost:8080
$ wget https://fossil-scm.org
--2010-01-22 21:50:46-- https://fossil-scm.org/
Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1
Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:8080... connecte
Well, I also use fossil for file copy across my office laptop / home computer.
One is with domain login, other with no domain and many times windows copy just
doesn't work... may be because of firewall or some security app. But anyway,
fossil works better as optimized / compressed file copy and
This script is already documented on Cookbook page. Look for document under
'Another solution to automatically serve multiple repositories' title.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Ron Aaron
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 4:47 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-us
Graphical display doesn't show up on timelines for a branch:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?t=ssl
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Clark Christensen
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 3:47 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Graphical display of fork/m
This sounds good!
-Altu
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Cowgar
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org; fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Feb 10, 2010 11:07 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Extra files and new files
> Hello,>> What about?>> fossil ignore file1 file2 ...>> In th
Hi,
It seems --date-override doesn't work correctly with fossil new, which
is required for importing files from other repositories:
$ fossil new test.fsl -A test --date-override "2010-01-01 UTC"
project-id: 05468b497577aa00211a76732a997723fb5a8acf
server-id: 23567149953dd056df1d40062d214826895c
Hi Terry,
Fossil has many good features that made me look at, contribute to and
use it as personal VCS.
However, fossil is created and maintained out of personal interest. It
does not intent to become a next-gen DVCS system replacing git or
others. The idea is: If you like it, use it.
- Altu
> I expected e.g. "fossil changes" to give me my current directory
changes only.
This is indeed a reasonable requirement. When working inside a checkout
repository, all local commands should operate within working directory.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Andy Reynolds
To: fossil-use
> Mercurial has a whole subsystem (mq) to manage unpublished patches.
Git implements 'rebase', and allows you to move unpublished commits
forward.
This is dangerous and we have faced issues when we used commit ids from
a git repository managed by another team. After few months, the commit
ids
HTML is complete, We agree. But then why these special formatting
rules, which are very basic and too incomplete?
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki_rules
It will be preferred if Wiki pages are instead stored as .html files
and not use any non-HTML formats.
- Altu
-Original Message
Hi,
Is there a rebase feature in fossil that is similar to git rebase? If
not, is it planned?
- Altu
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Well, my understanding of rebase has changed since then, due to the
same problem we faced. Git 'forgets' unpublished versions when doing
rebase (but it need not - I may still be wrong here). I'm sure if
fossil implements rebase, it will not forget old versions.
What I'm interested in is the 'fe
I'm trying to build 953d293c32 version of fossil for Windows, which
seems broken:
gcc -g -O2 -o makeheaders .\\src\\makeheaders.c
awk "{ printf \"#define MANIFEST_UUID \\\"%%s\\\"\n\", $1}"
.\\src\\..\\manifest.uuid >VERSION.h
gawk: { printf "#define MANIFEST_UUID \"%%s\"\n", }
gawk:
Hi DRH,
I can build fossil from trunk now.
However, there seems some issue with date/time. It shows incorrect date:
$ rm test.fsl
$ ./fossil new test.fsl
project-id: 6e13be383106646451d79a5eae4f731c84d22135
server-id: f0202d8c43fc11569996c45150aca4740ffd49c6
admin-user: altufaltu (initial
Thanks. This works correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 8:56 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Windows build broken?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:43 AM, wrote:
Hi DRH,
I can build fossil from trunk now.
However
Git rebase help has a very good graphic to explain what it does:
Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic":
A---B---C topic
/
D---E---F---G master
From this point, the result of either of the following commands:
git rebase master
git rebase mas
Well, you have custom changes (A, B, C) in a branch and you want to
keep up with latest changes happening in trunk - at frequent intervals.
What rebase does is it applies your changes A, B & C to new head (G)
with a knowledge of everything that has happened between E & G. If any
of A, B or C wa
I'm not sure. Is there really no difference?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Michael Richter
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Jun 24, 2010 4:23 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil rebase
What does this do that fossil merge trunk from my branch in
ttmrichter doesn't
You can do fossil ui, select the checkin with wrong date and edit the
date to approximate correct value.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Ronald
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 8:25 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] ancestor check-in is younger
> I tr
That's interesting... May I request you to share recipe to build ssh &
git native for Windows?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Dan
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 4:06 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Makefile
Yep.. I build fossil in cmd.exe on vista reg
... and also for fossil from cmd.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: altufa...@mail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 8:45 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Makefile
That's interesting... May I request you to share recipe to build ssh &
git native for Windows?
Hi BMorgat,
Thanks for your script for showing icons in Files page. It works well.
(I cannot add this info to Tickets page due to IP changes, so writing
by mail)
- Altu
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossi
This site works like a charm... Thanks for the great tool!
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: James Turner
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Sat, Jul 31, 2010 5:08 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Hosted fossil solution
On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On T
Someone in this group said that he/she has a recipe to build native ssh
for windows. Can that solve the problem on Windows?
Having ssh in PATH is sufficient or the functionality should be built
in fossil? I'm asking this because I wonder how will ssh and fossil
share public/private keys, known_
fossil chmod is a good idea!
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Paine
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Oct 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Managing file attributes of repository files
On 10/19/2010 10:00 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:> The main complication i
Hi Richard,
These changes are interesting.
> fossil setting repo-cksum off
If I use this setting on local checkouts and let's assume for some
reasons that a commit damages the local database. If I don't have
repo-cksum disabled on the remote repository (assume on http), will I
get an error mes
No reply to this question yet - sound that this option is risky!
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: altufa...@mail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Oct 20, 2010 9:58 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil enhancements: Please test
Hi Richard,
These changes are intere
> if it is, it sets the local config to whatever the global was.
Can you check if this is true? I'm using latest version of fossil,
which doesn't exhibit this.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: James Turner
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 8:05 am
Subject: Re:
Hi Richard,
> If a global config setting for autosync is not present when fossil new
> is issued, line 1009 of db.c will set autosync to 1 in the local
config.
> "if( !db_is_global("autosync") ) db_set_int("autosync", 1, 0);"
What's the reason behind this?
- Altu
-Original Message-
Fr
I'm unable to clone fossil any more...
> fossil version
This is fossil version [d0753799e4] 2010-11-01 14:23:35 UTC
>fossil clone http://www.fossil-scm.org/ myclone.fossil --proxy off
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Sent: 53 1 0 0
wai
Still doesn't work for me...
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:22 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Cannot clone fossil
Your work-around until I get 302-handling fixed is to use
fossil clone http://www.fossil-sc
Exactly the same... waiting for server in the first go...
> fossil-d0753799e4.exe clone http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil
fossil.fsl --proxy off
Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas
Sent: 53 1 0 0
waiting for server...^C
- Altu
-Orig
Thanks Venkat, That worked for me too
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Venkat Iyer
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Sun, Nov 7, 2010 2:04 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Cannot clone fossil
What worked for me was cloning from www2.fossil-scm.org and then
changing the url to po
d0753799e4
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Mon, Nov 8, 2010 6:14 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Cannot clone fossil
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Venkat Iyer wrote:
What worked for me was cloning from www2.fossil-scm.org
+1
-Original Message-
From: pablo veliz
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Dec 16, 2010 8:07 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Hello. Anyone for source highlighting?
Since we are using a browser to see the code, why not use a client side
library for syntax-highlighting li
This is interesting. Where can I get consolidated recipe?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Volodya Savastiouk, MSC
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Dec 17, 2010 12:13 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Hello. Anyone for source highlighting?
Hi,
I did ment
Me too get this error, compiling on XP (MinGW). Looks like one of the
side effects of http://localhost/fossil/fossil/info/e084092a07.
-Original Message-
From: Arnel Legaspi
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 21, 2010 4:41 am
Subject: [fossil-users] Errors during compil
Oops, posted local link there.
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/e084092a07
-Original Message-
From: altufa...@mail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 21, 2010 9:18 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Errors during compile in Windows 7 x64
Me too get this error
OBJDIR = ./wobj in Makefile.w32
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 21, 2010 5:40 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Errors during compile in Windows 7 x64
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Arnel Legaspi
wrote:
Hello,
Compiling Fo
If I remember, I could do fossil set outside any open checkout to read
/ set global settings.
Today I discovered that fossil set requires a repository or open
checkout.
Is this expected?
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
I might be mistaken. I always used that command from a checkout.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 21, 2010 7:54 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil set outside an open checkout
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:18 AM, wrote:
If I
I recall it now. I did that with git for setting global options.
-Original Message-
From: altufa...@mail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 21, 2010 10:06 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil set outside an open checkout
I might be mistaken. I always used that com
Hi Ross,
I face this issue even on Win32 XP SP2. It used to build successfully
before recent commit [e084092a07].
Were you successful to build it after above commit?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Ross Berteig
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org; fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Single fossil.exe, single repository.fossil and single _FOSSIL_. That's
why I love fossil :)
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Beal
To: fossil-users
Sent: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 7:58 pm
Subject: [fossil-users] An annecdote on screwing up (and recovering) a
broken fossil repo
Hello
You can use eclipse IDE to refactor C code.
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Beal
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 10:24 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] An annecdote on screwing up (and
recovering) a broken fossil repo
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Steph
100 matches
Mail list logo