Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-15 Thread K. Fossil user
We don't care if it is your name).  Regards K. De : Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Mardi 15 novembre 2016 10h46 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary Dear "K. Fossi

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-15 Thread Will Parsons
On Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016 5:46 AM -0500, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Dear "K. Fossil user", > it's been said before. Please keep your aggressive attitude and > platitudes to yourself. You are just annoying and distracting people. It should be pretty clear by now that "K. Fossil user" is a troll.

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-15 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
Dear "K. Fossil user", it's been said before. Please keep your aggressive attitude and platitudes to yourself. You are just annoying and distracting people. Joerg ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-14 Thread K. Fossil user
t if you can...    Best Regards K. De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 10h58 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-14 Thread K. Fossil user
K. De : Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 18h38 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary On Nov 11, 2016 5:28

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-13 Thread Scott Robison
Best Regards > > K. > > > > De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it> > > À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> > Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38 > Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Downloa

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-13 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:24 AM, K. Fossil user wrote: > Explain me why a SO serious project could not wait for 10 days or if it is > not that possible (I don't see why ??), why don't Fossil create a 1.36.1? Sorry pal, my guess is that the latest sqlite3 was not

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-11 Thread K. Fossil user
ts.fossil-scm.org> Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Beyond that, I don't understand why

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-11 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user wrote: > Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ... Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th. Anyway, I cannot find

Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary

2016-11-09 Thread K. Fossil user
Hi, Yes, you should not give something dynamic to people ...I guess that it is 64 bits because they are not aware by the fact that they should compile for both architectures (32 bits AND 64 bits binary)? I've recommended to the Fossil team that they should create a 1.36.1 release because most