We don't care if it is your name).
Regards
K.
De : Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de>
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 15 novembre 2016 10h46
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
Dear "K. Fossi
On Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016 5:46 AM -0500, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Dear "K. Fossil user",
> it's been said before. Please keep your aggressive attitude and
> platitudes to yourself. You are just annoying and distracting people.
It should be pretty clear by now that "K. Fossil user" is a troll.
Dear "K. Fossil user",
it's been said before. Please keep your aggressive attitude and
platitudes to yourself. You are just annoying and distracting people.
Joerg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
t if you can...
Best Regards
K.
De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 10h58
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
K.
De : Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com>
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 18h38
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Nov 11, 2016 5:28
Best Regards
>
> K.
>
>
>
> De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
>
> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
> Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Downloa
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:24 AM, K. Fossil user
wrote:
> Explain me why a SO serious project could not wait for 10 days or if it is
> not that possible (I don't see why ??), why don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?
Sorry pal, my guess is that the latest sqlite3 was not
ts.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
<ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Beyond that, I don't understand why
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
wrote:
> Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ...
Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while
fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th.
Anyway, I cannot find
Hi,
Yes, you should not give something dynamic to people ...I guess that it is 64
bits because they are not aware by the fact that they should compile for both
architectures (32 bits AND 64 bits binary)?
I've recommended to the Fossil team that they should create a 1.36.1 release
because most
10 matches
Mail list logo