Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

2007-11-29 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On 11/29/07, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The boycottnovell site and the OP alluded to that there would be moral, philosophical and or legal problems with GNOME depending on Mono and or C#. Is that fact or is it fiction? Moral or philosophical is hard to judge, since so

Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

2007-11-29 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On 11/29/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree this isn't really something that the foundation can force, but even asking politely in an official capacity would be a step in the right direction. The Foundation asking politely of developers with regards to their choices, or

Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

2007-11-30 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On 11/29/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 29 novembre 2007, à 18:03 -0500, Joe Shaw a écrit : It's been frustrating over the past few years that GNOME hasn't taken a firm position on the issue. I have personally felt very in limbo because my application is in C

Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

2007-11-30 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On 11/30/07, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for as much threatening as Microsoft does around IP, they're not particularly active in litigating on it. When the issue is about patent law, saying intellectual property instead of patents only tends to confuse the

Re: Proposal: Desktop Search hackfest

2008-07-21 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal: Desktop Search Hackfest. Calling to: Xesam, Beagle, Tracker projects and whoever else is involved. When: September 19 + the days the developers decide before after. Where: Berlin. Why: The Board made a call to