On 9/28/2020 9:35 AM, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-devel wrote:
On 9/28/20 12:24 AM, Travis Siegel via fpc-devel wrote:
How does one get a 64-bit version on windows. When I try to run a
64-bit version on windows, I encounter an error, though I don't
remember what that error is, since I've not
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 6:34 AM Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> I made some time for this, it's checked in with revision 46987.
>
> Thank you for your patch, and I'm sorry that it took me so long to get to
> it...
No worries, thank you so much for your work on this. Much appreciated. :-)
On 9/28/20 10:01 PM, Bart via fpc-devel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:45 PM Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-devel
wrote:
compile to win32 via:
fpc -Pi386 hello.pas
AFAIK a simple fpc hello.pas will do in that setup.
Yes, that is true. The -Pi386 is optional in this case.
and to win64 via:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:45 PM Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-devel
wrote:
> compile to win32 via:
>
> fpc -Pi386 hello.pas
AFAIK a simple fpc hello.pas will do in that setup.
> and to win64 via:
>
> fpc -Px86_64 hello.pas
Doesn't that need a -TWin64 as well?
--
Bart
On 28.09.2020 16:05, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-devel wrote:
On 28.09.2020 15:34, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel wrote:
I made some time for this, it's checked in with revision 46987.
Note that this revision also enables support for LibreSSL (or
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-devel wrote:
On 28.09.2020 15:34, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel wrote:
I made some time for this, it's checked in with revision 46987.
Note that this revision also enables support for LibreSSL (or whatever
it is
called) versions on linux/mac
On 28.09.2020 15:34, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel wrote:
I made some time for this, it's checked in with revision 46987.
Note that this revision also enables support for LibreSSL (or whatever
it is
called) versions on linux/mac systems.
Thank you for your patch, and I'm sorry that it
On 9/28/20 12:24 AM, Travis Siegel via fpc-devel wrote:
How does one get a 64-bit version on windows. When I try to run a
64-bit version on windows, I encounter an error, though I don't
remember what that error is, since I've not tried it for a couple
weeks. I didn't even know there was a
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Thank you very much for the patch.
I will look at this ASAP.
Hi Michael,
The OpenSSL library loading code still has the potential to load
mismatched library versions. Did you get a chance to review the patch
I sent?
Not yet, I'm currently
Travis Siegel via fpc-devel schrieb am
Mo., 28. Sep. 2020, 10:01:
> But, in any case, if there's a way to get 64-bit versions on windows, I'd
> like to know how.
>
Easiest: install a 64-bit Lazarus, it contains a 64-bit FPC.
Other than that: download the source for your compiler version and
On 27.09.2020 23:45, Travis Siegel via fpc-devel wrote:
On 9/27/2020 3:50 PM, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
- there are little libraries being really IEEE compliant for float128
- if they are IEEE compliant, their license does not allow to use the
code in the FPC rtl.
I don't
On 9/27/2020 3:50 PM, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
- there are little libraries being really IEEE compliant for float128
- if they are IEEE compliant, their license does not allow to use the
code in the FPC rtl.
I don't understand this statement.
How does having all the required
How does one get a 64-bit version on windows. When I try to run a
64-bit version on windows, I encounter an error, though I don't remember
what that error is, since I've not tried it for a couple weeks. I
didn't even know there was a 64-bit windows version, because as
mentioned below,
> Am 28.09.2020 um 00:32 schrieb Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-devel
> :
>
> I don't have an exact answer, but I think higher precision is better,
> compared to lower. You can not expect bitwise identical result, when using
> floating point calculations anyway. For example AMD and Intel FPUs
14 matches
Mail list logo
