On 16/03/2015 14:18, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 13:17, Martin Frb wrote:
Local commits (commit, without push) can be a huge advantage.
Ah yes, but they loved the idea shortly afterwards.
As I said they *can* be a huge advantage.
svn up is roughly equal to:
On 16.3.2015 г. 14:24, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I can also add that SubVersion has *no* concept of Tags. To SubVersion
there is no difference between a Tag and a Branch. Why do I say that?
Simply because you can create a Tag in the repository, and then start
adding commits to it just mind
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 13:17, Martin Frb wrote:
Local commits (commit, without push) can be a huge advantage.
Ah yes, but they loved the idea shortly afterwards. Then weeks later
when I mentioned the rebase command to neaten up local commits before
you make it public - that was another
On 03/16/2015 11:34 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
But again, use whatever fits you best. I did deep evaluations of many
systems, then made my choice. So far, I'm very happy with my choice and
outcome.
Yes, we *know*. You have made us well aware of this fact. :)
Nikolay
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 12:35, Martin Frb wrote:
better product, simply means: Compared to others it scores better on
more use cases.
Agreed. :-)
Different people learn in different ways. There will be a fair share of
people for whom taking their first steps into using a repository
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If you want facts, then do a Google search. See the exponential growth
of projects migrating from SubVersion (or other systems) to Git. Qt,
KDE, Linux Kernel etc - they are massive projects and must have had very
good reason to move to Git.
The Linux developers moved
On 16 March 2015 at 11:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-ot...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If you want facts, then do a Google search. See the exponential growth
of projects migrating from SubVersion (or other systems) to Git. Qt,
KDE, Linux Kernel etc - they are
Hello Frank,
On 2015-03-16 12:08, vfclists . wrote:
have there been any good surveys supporting that conclusion?
Yes, mine. :-P
G.
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
A better metric might be finding somebody who offers a selection of VCS
protocols (possibly with a common backend- I believe such things exist?)
and then looking at the relative use for checkouts etc.
You can start by looking at the
Hello Mark,
On 2015-03-16 11:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
details perhaps they'd explain them, after all /somebody/ has to give
Graeme something concrete on which to build his argument :-)
hehehe... Just watch Linus's Google Tech Talk on YouTube. ;-)
I can also add that SubVersion has *no*
On 16/03/2015 09:23, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
As the majority of developers would tell you, Git is simply the better
product at this stage.
That I can live with.
There is a 2nd potential point of confusion to it.
better product, simply means: Compared to others it scores better on
more use
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 14:35, Martin Frb wrote:
A simple git alias can do that for you all in one command. ;-)
And in a GUI? The only GUI on windows that was to my taste, is Tortoise.
And exactly why I don't bother with 3rd party GUI frontends. They *all*
lack git features.
I found
Hello Florian,
On 2015-03-16 19:51, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
But why do you use Pascal then?
Sadly, I'm slowly moving to Java. Go where the work is.
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hello Mark,
On 2015-03-16 11:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
details perhaps they'd explain them, after all /somebody/ has to give
Graeme something concrete on which to build his argument :-)
hehehe... Just watch Linus's Google Tech Talk on YouTube. ;-)
I can also add
Am 16.03.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 12:35, Martin Frb wrote:
better product, simply means: Compared to others it scores better on
more use cases.
Agreed. :-)
Different people learn in different ways. There will be a fair share of
people
Am 16.03.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
As the majority of developers would tell you, Git is simply the better
product at this stage.
If you want facts, then do a Google search. See the exponential growth
of projects migrating from SubVersion (or other systems) to Git. Qt,
KDE,
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-15 20:32, Martin Frb wrote:
But that does not change, that there are developers who store their
projects in GIT, but who do not use the features at all. For such a
developer it can be said, that even CVS has more feature, than the set
of features they use in GIT.
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-15 20:49, Martin Frb wrote:
I did judge your statement on it, that
/As 99% of developers would tell you, Git is simply// the better product./
My apologies if there has been some confusion. Probably down to a
language barrier issue.
In the context the usage of 99%
In our previous episode, vfclists . said:
Now Florian, considering your preference for GUI tools, won't the
development of cross platform Git GUI surpassing Tortoise Git, Github and
Atlassian's tools, SmartGit and whatever be the best advert for Lazarus and
FPC? There would such a major flow
Hello Florian,
On 2015-03-15 14:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
with git-svn
'git svn' is super useful - I use it often. It is merely a stop-gap
though. It limits a git repo (features) a lot. But like I said, it is
still useful.
Regards,
Graeme
___
Am 15.03.2015 um 15:40 schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 15.03.2015 um 15:11 schrieb vfclists .:
Somehow all this indifference to Git bothers me because it seems they are
ignoring the greater
realities of life. If a new generation are going to get involved with FPC
and Lazarus development,
and
On 15 March 2015 at 13:21, Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Paul Breneman:
On 03/15/2015 05:44 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
NOBODY I
know has ever considered going back to SubVersion after using
Am 15.03.2015 um 15:11 schrieb vfclists .:
Somehow all this indifference to Git bothers me because it seems they are
ignoring the greater
realities of life. If a new generation are going to get involved with FPC and
Lazarus development,
and the main developers are really concerned with all
Hi,
On 2015-03-15 14:11, vfclists . wrote:
I think such a tool with documentation on how it was built would be the
best advert for Lazarus and FreePascal. Graeme?
I've tried ever GUI tool under the sun for Git. They all have there
faults. In most cases they often get confused about the actual
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hello Mark Morgan,
If you /don't/ mind, the name is Mark Morgan Lloyd. The original Morgan
Lloyd (strictly, Morgan Llwyd) was a churchman of considerable renown,
and at some point my family adopted his name which persists to the
current generation.
As far as the
On 15/03/2015 20:32, Martin Frb wrote:
I'm not talking about just installing it and not
doing anything with it - that's NOT using a product, so you can't review
it based on that.
I forget that in my reply:
That is what some people do (and what I pointed out): install, but not
really use.
On 15 March 2015 at 16:13, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15.03.2015 15:11, vfclists . wrote:
I think the main FPC developers need to realize that sooner or later
they are allow going to retire from FPC development and move onto other
things, or just retire form working
El 15/03/15 a les 11:10, Graeme Geldenhuys ha escrit:
Hello Mark Morgan,
I wasn't going to reply because I've had enough fruitless debates in
these mailing lists. But here I go again - I just can't help myself -
especially if I see false statement being thrown around as if they are fact.
Reading the replies I can clearly see that neither of you have ever used
Git for actual work.
I have, and I do. That said, only for maybe 6 to 9 month by now, and in
that time I might well only have scratched the surface of it, and yet
much to discover.
But never mind how well I know it, that
Reading the replies I can clearly see that neither of you have ever used
Git for actual work.
I have, and I do. That said, only for maybe 6 to 9 month by now, and in
that time I might well only have scratched the surface of it, and yet
much to discover.
But never mind how well I know it, that
On 03/15/2015 08:21 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Paul Breneman:
On 03/15/2015 05:44 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
NOBODY I
know has ever considered going back to SubVersion after using Git.
Good to know that upper
31 matches
Mail list logo
