Re: [fpc-pascal] LLVM (again)

On 04/19/2013 03:02 PM, Reimar Grabowski wrote: Hi, I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine called my attention to this: https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki From what I have seen this is

Re: [fpc-pascal] MS DOS 8086 compiler?

On 04/28/2013 12:00 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Bart wrote: On 4/27/13, Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote: Noticed that an 8086 branch was merged to fpc trunk. Is it time to get out some 5.25 diskettes[1]? [1] Shame I dumped all the accompanying hardware long ago ;)

Re: [fpc-pascal] MS DOS 8086 compiler?

On 04/29/2013 12:49 PM, Michael Schnell wrote: On 04/27/2013 02:11 PM, Bart wrote: On 4/27/13, Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote: Noticed that an 8086 branch was merged to fpc trunk. Is it time to get out some 5.25 diskettes[1]? [1] Shame I dumped all the accompanying

Re: [fpc-pascal] MS DOS 8086 compiler?

On 04/30/2013 01:42 AM, Rolf Grunsky wrote: I still have my Z-80A system with two Tandon half-height 8 single sided drives. I haven't attempted to power it up in 25 years. I also have my original CP/M 80 disc and my original TurboPascal version 1.0 for Z-80 on an eight inch disc with the

Re: [fpc-pascal] [Fwd: [Lazarus] IOI: Lazarus and Free Pascal]

On 08/21/2009 08:31 PM, Žilvinas Ledas wrote: Yes, i'ts so frustrating when you can't write solutions in ACM using your best known programming language... Yeah, that sucks, I know. My guess is that since ACM is sponsored by IBM, they want to push their Eclipse and Java crap and Pascal just

Re: [fpc-pascal] Text IDE under Linux FrameBuffer

On 09/13/2009 11:38 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: 2009/9/13 Nikolay Nikolovnick...@users.sourceforge.net: Could you provide some more information? Which distro are you using? What's your locale (i.e. the value of the LANG environment variable)? And which I'm using Ubuntu 8.04 and

Re: [fpc-pascal] Case in Record

On 10/06/2009 06:31 PM, Frank Peelo wrote: Any new concepts that were introduced, like properties, were applied only to the new classes and objects were left in a corner, like the embarrassing relative that you wish you could get rid of, but can't. However, AFAIK Free Pascal supports properties

Re: [fpc-pascal] MSEide+MSEgui SourceForge - BerliOS

On 02/05/2010 03:25 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote: Please read: http://sourceforge.net/blog/clarifying-sourceforgenets-denial-of-site-access-for-certain-persons-in-accordance-with-us-law/ Martin Good news, they have added the option to lift those restrictions. It's now up to the project

Re: [fpc-pascal] Converting a graphical DOS program to fpc

On 07/01/2010 05:46 AM, Simon Webster wrote: Dear Free Pascallers, I'm wanting to convert a Turbo Pascal program to fpc, to run (ultimately) under linux, although I'm actually developing on a mac, and using virtualbox to run ubuntu. The program in question is a relatively large non OOP program

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc graph

On 05/02/2011 02:58 PM, John Lee wrote: Been trying to use the windows graph from 2.4 release svn, running on standard xp sp3 laptop, with 1024*768 resolution screen setting, 96dpi, intel mobile express 965 chipset according to control panel. Note that you can also try unit ptcgraph (and

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc graph

On 05/02/2011 04:03 PM, johnelee1...@googlemail.com wrote: thanks - what are the features of ptcgraph vs graph? - I just want simple line graphs in win eg of data from a file, so was guessing that graph, from its name, was the 'best' option. J Ptcgraph is new (fpc 2.4.4 will be the first

Re: [fpc-pascal] Missini graph unit

On 05/28/2011 11:46 AM, Elio Fabri wrote: Hi, I downloaded fpc-2.4.4.x86_64-linux.tar and installed OK. But the compiler cannot find the Graph unit. Apparently the graph.ppu file is missing. Where can I find it, or a valid substitute? Try the ptcgraph unit.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Missini graph unit

On 05/30/2011 12:25 PM, Elio Fabri wrote: I tried ptcgraph by a mere change of names, and it works, more or less. However, the graph unit still appears in the doc, whereas I cant't find no doc for pctgraph. Some help? It's a new unit (first included with fpc 2.4.4) and therefore not yet

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pseudographics in FPC-IDE

On 06/13/2011 08:39 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote: Hello all, I have installed FPC on a Linux machine to find that in the virtual terminal (true text-mode, not GUI-based emulator) FP-IDE does not dispaly pseudographics correctly. It turned out that changes to the SFM (Screen Font Map) doesn't

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pseudographics in FPC-IDE

On 06/13/2011 09:17 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote: Nikolay Nikolov: Modern FPC versions should support UTF-8 output for the IDE. I made a patch for this, that was included in fpc 2.4.2 IIRC. Which FPC version are you using and on which linux distro/version? What is the value of the LANG

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pseudographics in FPC-IDE

On 06/14/2011 09:33 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote: Graeme Geldenhuys: You are welcome to add it to the wiki. I still do not fully understand the problem, so please, review what I have come up with: On Linux/Unix the FP-IDE calculates the addresses of the drawing charactes

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pseudographics in FPC-IDE

On 06/15/2011 04:15 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote: Nikolay Nikolov: Basically, all it does is, it checks if the LANG variable contains ґUTF-8' as a substring (not sure if it is the right way to do it, but it works for Fedora, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Mandriva and latest Debian) and if it does

Re: [fpc-pascal] Constructors Destructors 101

Jonas Maebe wrote: If you had two different create constructors (for whatever reason), might you not also need two different destroy destructors? No, the default destructor should always free all resources, regardless of how the class instance was created. Otherwise, it would also make your

[fpc-pascal]using 'overload'

Is it necessary to use the 'overload' directive in objfpc mode? E.g. this code doesn't work: {$MODE objfpc} Program Test2; Type TBaseFunClass = Class(TObject) Procedure DoStuff(a : Integer; b : Integer); Virtual; Abstract; Procedure DoStuff(a : Integer); End; TFunClass =

Re: [fpc-pascal]runtime 201 with swapword function

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does the following result in a runtime error ? program example; const THE_PORT = ; function swapWord(w: Word): Word; begin swapWord := (w SHL 8) OR (w SHR 8); end; How can I correct this ? This bit of code was taken directly from server.pp in one of the old 2002

Re: [fpc-pascal]Cross-Compiling

James Mills wrote: How are you guys goins with crosscompiling ? I'd like to be able to cross compile from Debian/Linux to various other platforms... Or have you been crosscompiling the other way ? First of all, you need binutils, compiled with support for the targets you want. Get the source,

Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)

Harald Houppermans wrote: WOW very interesting indeed I thought you did it like this: asm mov CS, blabla mov IP, blabla end But now I see !!! You are actually using the parameters: CS := blabla; :) IP := blabla; :) Those interrupt parameters actually allow something which otherwise isn't

Re: [fpc-pascal]Hex values

Marco van de Voort wrote: oct: 088; // 1.9+ only bin: %101010; // 1.9+ only These also work for 1.0.10. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal]Schedule request (educational and olympiad applications of FPC)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furthermore, the International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) this year is taking place in September, and software versions are in the process of being decided. Speaking of olympiads (and IOI), how about including e.g. DeCAL in the standard FPC distribution (e.g. in

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal newbie

Gustavo Galembeck wrote: As my inicial question in the list, I'd like to know the best way of developing a Win32 / Linux 2D game using Freepascal. Is the PTCPas unit a good choice? I translated it from C++ in 2001 and it's good enough for me. :-) It provides graphics output, keyboard input

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal newbie [Attn] Nikolay Nikolov

Ron Weidner wrote: Nikolay, Why did you translate openPTC instead of some of the other available choices? What advantages does openPTC offer over SDL or Allegro? Do you have any (Linux) demos/games written with openPTC that I can take a look at? What do you think about tinyPTC? No serious

[fpc-pascal] Problems accessing www/cvs.freepascal.org

The site times out at 'HTTP request sent; waiting for response.'. Works fine at work, but I can't access it from home. :( www.freepascal.org resolves to 62.166.198.202, and I can ping that host. At work it resolves to the same address, and no, I haven't put anything in my hosts file. My IP is

Re: [fpc-pascal] Question about interfaces

ml wrote: But you're wrong for '::' '::' exists in perl too. Sorry, I don't speak perl :) I know only C, C++, Java, C# and Object Pascal. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal]

Anandu R Suri wrote: I am writing an operating system using your Free Pascal Compilier 1.0.10. Most of my code is based on the IA32 opcodes in $ASMMODE INTEL. I have two problems, both are of importance. 1. The very basic problem is with the video driver. Whenever I try to write to the Video

Re: [fpc-pascal] Silly Syntax Games

L505 wrote: But.. for all the C wussies out there.. this won't work : program Project1; {$mode objfpc}{$H+} {$define {:= begin} //this works {$define }:= end. } //this doesn't work {$define }:= end; } //this doesn't work var iLoc:integer; { for iLoc:= 1 to 60 do writeln('test') }

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

L505 wrote: Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi compiler is originated from borland C++ as far as my tools told me. Yes, actually DCC32 is written in C++. Only the Delphi IDE is written in Delphi. FPC and Lazarus are both written in FPC :)

Re: [fpc-pascal] 64 Bit Intel-Processors??

Thomas Zastrow wrote: Hello, I'm writing a little article about Pascal-Development under Linux. My question: Am I right that FPC will not work on Intels 64-Bit-Processors??? I just found something about the AMD-64-Bit-platform ... It should run on Intel EM64T

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

L505 wrote: Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one except using a propritary compiler. But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based? Molecules, Ions, and atoms? i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

L505 wrote: Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one except using a propritary compiler. But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based? Molecules, Ions, and atoms? i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

L505 wrote: The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed for the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language. And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory with that magic script? At some point it comes to a

Re: [fpc-pascal] DOS compiler wiki page: please review

On 09/27/2013 09:53 AM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: I decided to start a page for the DOS compiler - as more details become available we can hopefully collect them there. As usual: additions/corrections welcome, especially by Nikolay ;) - I've added some statements with question marks that I'm

Re: [fpc-pascal] DOS compiler wiki page: please review

On 10/05/2013 03:07 PM, greim wrote: Hi, writing a 8086 version of fpc is not so strange as some may think! There are still some 80186 processors around running in embedded systems! These architecture is certified for some applications in industrial and avionik controll. So my wish

Re: [fpc-pascal] Could use some help with DOS cross compile

On 10/20/2013 01:56 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Trying to create dos cross compiler using FPC trunk x86 r25833, Windows NASM binaries etc from Marco's post [2] dir c:\Development\cross\bin\i8086-msdos .. 02/01/2013 11:06 743,424 msdos-nasm.exe 25/05/2010 08:3633,792

Re: [fpc-pascal] Could use some help with DOS cross compile

On 10/20/2013 06:31 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: However this: fpc -Pi8086 -TMSDOS d:\cop\t\test.pas gives Free Pascal Compiler version 2.7.1 [2013/10/20] for i8086 Copyright (c) 1993-2013 by Florian Klaempfl and others Target OS: MS-DOS 16-bit real mode Compiling d:\cop\t\test.pas PPU Loading

Re: [fpc-pascal] Could use some help with DOS cross compile

On 10/20/2013 08:12 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 10/20/2013 06:31 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: However this: fpc -Pi8086 -TMSDOS d:\cop\t\test.pas gives Free Pascal Compiler version 2.7.1 [2013/10/20] for i8086 Copyright (c) 1993-2013 by Florian Klaempfl and others Target OS: MS-DOS 16-bit

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Could use some help with DOS cross compile

On 10/21/2013 12:15 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 20/10/2013 20:14, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 10/20/2013 08:12 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 10/20/2013 06:31 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Ok, now I see you've put it in the fpc.cfg, but it could be that your compiler doesn't find

Re: [fpc-pascal] Could use some help with DOS cross compile

On 10/28/2013 01:19 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 20/10/2013 13:27, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 10/20/2013 01:56 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Trying to create dos cross compiler using FPC trunk x86 r25833, Windows Why are you using OPT=-gw2 -gl I'm not sure these work at all. Debugging

Re: [fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

On 01/19/2014 10:45 PM, Sven Barth wrote: On 19.01.2014 20:47, Ched wrote: Dear Freepascalers, The multiplication in floating arthmetic units is usualy know as being slower than the addition. So, have I interest to code X+X, 2*X or X*2 when using reals (mainly double and extended) ?And with

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

On 01/26/2014 11:00 PM, fredvs wrote: Hello. Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ? If no, what do you think about that ? I know, it will be lot of work (like create a Delhi_Compatiblizer class...) PS : I absolutely do not want to hurt somebody, it is only a

Re: [fpc-pascal] ALSA 1.2.X wrappers required

On 06/06/2014 09:45 AM, leledumbo wrote: Hello, I want to program for ALSA, so I need the Pascal wrapper. Most recent one I found is fpALSA, which corresponds to 1.0.25 (last release) version if ALSA. However, current ALSA is of version 1.2.X and the interface is somewhat different with 1.0.X.

Re: [fpc-pascal] ALSA 1.2.X wrappers required

On 6.6.2014 г. 12:22, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 06/06/2014 09:45 AM, leledumbo wrote: Hello, I want to program for ALSA, so I need the Pascal wrapper. Most recent one I found is fpALSA, which corresponds to 1.0.25 (last release) version if ALSA. However, current ALSA is of version 1.2.X

Re: [fpc-pascal] ALSA 1.2.X wrappers required

On 06/06/2014 02:48 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 6.6.2014 г. 12:22, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 06/06/2014 09:45 AM, leledumbo wrote: Hello, I want to program for ALSA, so I need the Pascal wrapper. Most recent one I found is fpALSA, which corresponds to 1.0.25 (last release) version if ALSA

Re: [fpc-pascal] Effective memory allocation

On 11/02/2014 03:54 PM, Xiangrong Fang wrote: Hi All, ... Also, I usually use pointer to pass block of memory to functions. How do I implement a function with the following signature: procedure MyProc(var Buf; Len: Integer): I mean, how to handle var Buf inside the procedure body? You

Re: [fpc-pascal] PtrInt - possible candidate to be marked as deprecated

On 18.3.2015 г. 16:53, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Based on what the documentation says introduction of ptrint type was a mistake, shouldn't the PtrInt type be marked as deprecated in FPC 3.0.0 and removed in a later release like 3.0.2 or 3.2.0?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Found a compiler internal error, but no easy way to create simple example to reproduce

On 03/01/2015 10:03 AM, leledumbo wrote: I'm currently facing this situation, however the error comes from a 3rd party lazarus package which I've only managed to simplify to 1 unit (and its dependencies, of course, which is a lot). Since I can't create a simple example that can demonstrate the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Interface syntax: Is possible don't use specialize in mode objfpc?

On 07/16/2015 11:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote: On 16.07.2015 21:04, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc. Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC (and thus

Re: [fpc-pascal] bitmask vs sets. Is there a performance difference?

On 01/21/2016 01:11 AM, Sven Barth wrote: Am 20.01.2016 19:26 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" >: > > Is there a performance difference between using bitmask values and sets? For sets with <= 32 elements it should behave the

Re: [fpc-pascal] History of the Cardinal data type?

On 03/29/2016 06:13 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: Just curious. What is the history behind the Cardinal data type. As per the FPC documentation, it is always mapped to the LongWord type. I presume it is the same in Delphi. Cardinal is the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Textmode IDE splitscreen?

On 07/25/2016 12:57 AM, James Richters wrote: Is there a way to get the textmode IDE to do splitscreen the way Turbo Pascal used to if you had both a color and monochrome monitor? It was very handy to trace through the source code on the monochrome monitor and watch it execute on the other

Re: [fpc-pascal] SPARC / Linux

On 03/13/2017 10:10 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: On 13/03/17 06:30, Pierre Free Pascal wrote: Hi Mark, if you mean build a native installer for 32-btsparc-linux, I can tell you want you need to do: I'm used to building it for my own use. I'll take a look at your instructions for versions

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/15/2017 11:25 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 05/15/2017 01:51 PM, James Richters wrote: Thanks for the help and advice with this. I've been trying to figure out how a lot of this works. Here's where I'm at You could try the units ptcgraph or sdlgraph as alternatives (both are part

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/11/2017 10:25 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: On 11.05.2017 20:43, James Richters wrote: I have a few console graphics applications that I originally wrote in Turbo Pascal that I have been able to convert over to Free Pascal and now have windows versions of these programs. I

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/15/2017 01:51 PM, James Richters wrote: Thanks for the help and advice with this. I've been trying to figure out how a lot of this works. Here's where I'm at You could try the units ptcgraph or sdlgraph as alternatives (both are part of FPC). These seemed like the easiest things

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/16/2017 09:00 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: Am 16.05.2017 02:46 schrieb "Nikolay Nikolov" <nick...@gmail.com <mailto:nick...@gmail.com>>: >> I also no longer have the 'graphwindow' handle variable so I had to comment out anything that was using i

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

; *Cc:* Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> *Subject:* Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options? Am 16.05.2017 02:46 schrieb "Nikolay Nikolov" <nick...@gmail.com <mailto:nick...@gmail.com>>: >> I also no longer have the 'graphwindow' handle variable so I had t

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/16/2017 01:37 AM, James Richters wrote: I have managed to get ptcgraph and ptccrt to work with my program and I can report that there is an AMAZING increase in graphics performance! It is pretty much a drop in replacement and I did not change any compiler settings. I did have to

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/12/2017 10:30 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: Speed: In recent graphics work I've done, I've noticed that FPC is fantastic at created cross-platform applications. But the generated binaries are NOT fast at all - no matter how

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/12/2017 10:13 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Your unit obvious saves some time if it is already API compatible with the TP Graph unit. Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's a drop-in replacement for the graph unit. It runs TP7 BGI (or FPC programs for go32v2 for that matter) graphic

Re: [fpc-pascal] ptccrt missing keys

On 06/13/2017 01:33 AM, James Richters wrote: Follow the instructions in docs/INSTALL.txt to compile the package. Then add units\i386-win32 from the snapshot directory to the unit search path of your compiler. Can I have instructions on how to compile ptcpas for x86_64-win64? I tried

Re: [fpc-pascal] ptccrt missing keys

On 06/13/2017 02:56 AM, James Richters wrote: please be patient, it'll get there, maybe in a few week's time I will be happy to be patient  Thank you for all your hard work on this! Ok, I've implemented implemented this. ptccrt now has a KeyMode variable, which can be set to these values:

Re: [fpc-pascal] Implementing AggPas with PtcGraph

On 06/22/2017 02:42 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 06/22/2017 01:21 AM, James Richters wrote: putimage can be accelerated, although it would still have to do a memory copy. Like this? https://github.com/Zaaphod/ptcpas/compare/Zaaphod_Custom?expand=1#diff-fb31461e009ff29fda5c35c5115978b4

Re: [fpc-pascal] Implementing AggPas with PtcGraph

On 06/22/2017 01:21 AM, James Richters wrote: putimage can be accelerated, although it would still have to do a memory copy. Like this? https://github.com/Zaaphod/ptcpas/compare/Zaaphod_Custom?expand=1#diff-fb31461e009ff29fda5c35c5115978b4 This is amazingly faster. I ran a test of just

Re: [fpc-pascal] Implementing AggPas with PtcGraph

On 06/21/2017 10:27 PM, James Richters wrote: I was trying to find putimage to see how it worked... and I came across some notes about it in graph.inc as follows: { For significant speed improvements , is is recommended } { that these routines be hooked (otherwise the default, } { slower

Re: [fpc-pascal] Implementing AggPas with PtcGraph

On 06/21/2017 08:05 PM, James Richters wrote: Is there a more direct way of getting aggpas to send its output to ptcgraph? Currently I'm doing as in the demo programs and defining an array then using putimage() to transfer the array to ptcgraph... this is fairly slow, especially for

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/19/2017 03:54 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote: On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster wrote: 62.44 1.33 1.33 fpc_frac_real 26.76 1.90 0.57 MATH_$$_FLOOR$EXTENDED$$LONGINT 10.33 2.12 0.22

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/19/2017 02:11 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 05/19/2017 03:54 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote: On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster <jon-li...@jfpossibilities.com> wrote: 62.44 1.33 1.33 fpc_frac_real 26.76 1.90 0.57 MATH_$$_FLOOR$EXTENDED$$LONGINT 10.33

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/19/2017 06:13 PM, Jon Foster wrote: On 05/19/2017 04:11 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 05/19/2017 03:54 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote: On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster <jon-li...@jfpossibilities.com> wrote: 62.44 1.33 1.33 fpc_frac_real 26.76 1.90 0.57

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/20/2017 12:07 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 05/19/2017 11:24 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19.05.2017 19:22, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote: Hi, On Fri, 19 May 2017, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: I think Jeppe wanted to add vector support. Though the question here

Re: [fpc-pascal] [FPC-Pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/22/2017 02:21 AM, James Richters wrote: I have the window title working, Thank you for that. However I still have the same issue with non-responsive keyboard when I return to the graph window after an ALT-TAB. I am running on windows 10 64bit - program compiled for win32. I cannot

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

I realized I should have posted this in fpc-other. So, please reply in [fpc-other] and not here. On 05/23/2017 03:03 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 05/23/2017 01:20 AM, nore...@z505.com wrote: On 2017-05-18 19:54, Ryan Joseph wrote: On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster <jon

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/23/2017 06:09 PM, James Richters wrote: I think I figured out my problem, but I'm not sure how to fix it. I was looking at the code here: https://sourceforge.net/p/ptcpas/code/714/ And I see that the change made was to win32kbd.inc, but I don't think I'm using the updated version of

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

where I am at. I think If I could correctly apply win32kbd.inc it may work James -Original Message- From: fpc-pascal [mailto:fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] On Behalf Of Nikolay Nikolov Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:03 PM To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Subject: Re: [

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/24/2017 06:14 PM, James Richters wrote: I was finally able to get this working, and now my keyboard issues are solved, so thank for the help and fix Nikolay! I can't believe the performance increase using ptcgraph instead of graph, I am now even able to run my program on a tiny

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

talls in a directory without spaces, so it's not well tested at all. Make -v reports: GNU Make 3.82 Built for i686-pc-mingw32 James -Original Message- From: fpc-pascal [mailto:fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] On Behalf Of Nikolay Nikolov Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/21/2017 06:34 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote: I just compiled with ppcx64 3.1.1 (from 3.0.2) and went from 8fps to 22fps without optimizations and 28fpc with (I got some divide by zero errors but that’s just translations). What is that about? What changed? Just curious, why isn’t -Cfsse3

Re: [fpc-pascal] ptcgraph issues

On 05/17/2017 11:19 PM, James Richters wrote: If I get the full screen by setting fullscreengraph := True; then it does seem to report stop scaling and now everything fits correctly on the screen, however… this has it’s own issues. For some reason when I use this to obtain full screen,

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/16/2017 02:45 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: Tonight I'll also add the option for changing the title bar text, when in windowed mode. Implemented in r715. Note that you still cannot change the window title, after the window has been created, but at least now you can set

Re: [fpc-pascal] ptccrt missing keys

On 05/26/2017 10:49 PM, James Richters wrote: It's great that it's finally working for you. And yes, ptccrt supports most alt and ctrl key combinations, but if you find some key combination missing, please report it - it is easy to add. I could really use F11 and F12 including shift, alt,

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC 64bit for windows

On 05/15/2017 02:41 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 2017-05-15 11:59, James Richters wrote: When I try to install 64 bit windows version, I don't have this anymore The Free Pascal project, for some weird reason, only ships a 64-bit Windows cross-compiler. So you need both the 32-bit and

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/19/2017 11:24 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19.05.2017 19:22, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote: Hi, On Fri, 19 May 2017, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: I think Jeppe wanted to add vector support. Though the question here is whether one wants to optimize/detect this at

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options?

On 05/16/2017 02:45 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: Tonight I'll also add the option for changing the title bar text, when in windowed mode. Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to do it tonight (I'm kinda bad at time estimates ;-) ), but I'll probably implement it during the weekend

Re: [fpc-pascal] Implementing AggPas with PtcGraph

On 05/31/2017 02:51 PM, James Richters wrote: I was doing some tests with Putpixel and that seems to be a word in the format of RGBA with 4 bits each.I would think putimage would use the same format, but I haven't tested that yet. I'm still a bit confused by putimage, since it only has

Re: [fpc-pascal] Implementing AggPas with PtcGraph

On 06/03/2017 01:52 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 2017-06-03 01:56, Stefan V. Pantazi wrote: http://pascal.net.ru/PutImage+(en) [...] "BitMap is an untyped parameter that contains the height and width of the region, and the bit image that will be put onto the screen." [...] Could you

Re: [fpc-pascal] [FPC-Pascal] FPC Graphics options?

(...); -Original Message- From: fpc-pascal [mailto:fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] On Behalf Of Nikolay Nikolov Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 5:47 PM To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC Graphics options? On 05/16/2017 02:45 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC 3.0.4 DOS GO32V2

On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote: Hi, in new version 3.0.4 you have changed the declaration of some procedures and functions in the go32 unit. It does not matter, but I see a little mismatch for linear base address: FPC 3.0.2 function get_segment_base_address(d : word) :

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC 3.0.4 DOS GO32V2

On 12/03/2017 11:44 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote: On Sun, December 3, 2017 22:10, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote: Hi, FPC 3.0.2 function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint; function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : longint) : boolean; FPC

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC 3.0.4 DOS GO32V2

On 12/05/2017 12:01 AM, Lubomír Čabla wrote: Thanks to all for help. I checked and there were also other longint to dword changes in the go32 unit. I've documented them all at: http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3.0.4#go32 Best regards, Nikolay

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC fixes3.2 gives error on "NWord div 2 * 2"

On 2/17/19 11:29 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote: FPC gives an error on the NWord Maybe the compiler tries to be politically correct.  Sorry, couldn't resist. That's why it's called FPC - the Free Politically Correct compiler ;-) Nikolay

Re: [fpc-pascal] PTCGraph Causing 217

On 1/6/21 5:44 PM, James Richters via fpc-pascal wrote: I’ve been having issues with PTCGraph causing a runtime Error 217 : EAccessViolation: Access violation at seemingly random times in my program.The error is always on a line with either GetImage() or PutImage() but not the same one.The

Re: [fpc-pascal] TurboVision is reborn as FOSS (again)

On 12/21/20 10:42 AM, Markus Greim wrote: FPC has had a Turbo Pascal-like console IDE for many years... "has had" ? AKAIK "has" I still used it yesterday. English is not my native language, but I think "has had" means it still has it. If I had said "had" instead of "has had", it would

Re: [fpc-pascal] TurboVision is reborn as FOSS (again)

On 12/22/20 2:39 AM, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) via fpc-pascal wrote: Hi, On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: As long as one knows why a certain temporal construct is used there is no problem and at least in Germany (or more specifically Bavaria) we were taught that in

Re: [fpc-pascal] TurboVision is reborn as FOSS (again)

On 12/19/20 6:35 PM, Liam Proven via fpc-pascal wrote: https://github.com/magiblot/tvision Someone enterprising could make a TurboPascal clone out of FPC. :-) Meh. FPC has had a Turbo Pascal-like console IDE for many years. It uses Free Vision, which is a pascal port of the C++ version of

Re: [fpc-pascal] PTC Graph - Custom window sizes

On 11/19/20 3:44 PM, James Richters via fpc-pascal wrote: I've been using PTCGraph from PTCPas and so far I can only use windows sizes that there happens to be a display driver for, even if they are in a window.. so I can make a 640x480 or 1024x768 window, but if I have a screen in a

Re: [fpc-pascal] PTC Graph - Custom window sizes

On 11/19/20 7:37 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 11/19/20 3:44 PM, James Richters via fpc-pascal wrote: I've been using PTCGraph from PTCPas and so far I can only use windows sizes that there happens to be a display driver for,  even if they are in a window.. so I can make a 640x480

Re: [fpc-pascal] PTC Graph - Custom window sizes

to be rewritten anyway as a multi-window app. Nikolay James -Original Message- From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of James Richters via fpc-pascal Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 1:49 PM To: 'FPC-Pascal users discussions' Cc: James Richters ; 'Nikolay Nikolov' Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] PTC

  1   2   >