Well put!
On 4/23/2021 2:19 PM, Craig Ede wrote:
Yes, the structured documents have the ability to put one tag inside another
tag. Much more systematic and—dare I say it—better structured.
Craig
From: Framers on behalf
of Lynne A. Price
Won't help
Yes, the structured documents have the ability to put one tag inside another
tag. Much more systematic and—dare I say it—better structured.
Craig
From: Framers on
behalf of Lynne A. Price
Won't help with the definition of cross-reference formats, but in
list for people using Adobe
FrameMaker software." Subject: Re: [Framers] A
bizarre cross-reference issue Rick’s suggestion highlights one of the pitfalls
of FrameMaker’s tagging system. If you overlay a character tag with another
character tag, you may get a mix of characteristics i
Craig,
Won't help with the definition of cross-reference formats, but in
running text, you can apply two character formats easily in a structured
document--one element inside another, each applying character
properties. Both element tags survive.
--Lynne
On 4/23/2021 8:08 AM, Craig
To Craig's point about informing template users (including my own future
self,) about gotchas, I used to place short conditionalized informative
notes in margin areas on master pages. The notes were turned on in the
saved templates, so they would not be missed on first use. If needed, they
would
Rick’s suggestion highlights one of the pitfalls of FrameMaker’s tagging
system. If you overlay a character tag with another character tag, you may get
a mix of characteristics in the text depending on the settings for each of the
character tags. Anything left “As Is” in the second applied tag
: Thursday, April 22, 2021 7:00 PM
To: 'An email list for people using Adobe FrameMaker software.'
Subject: Re: [Framers] A bizarre cross-reference issue
How is your Link character format set up? Is the Position property set to As
Is? If not, that may be the issue.
Instead of applying two character
How is your Link character format set up? Is the Position property set to As
Is? If not, that may be the issue.
Instead of applying two character formats, I would suggest that you make a
single character format called SuperscriptLink (or something like that) that
has both the superscript position
