On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 03:59:57PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
This may be totally unrelated to bge, investigating a potential failing
stick
of ram in the machine in question so until we've ruled this out as the cause
don't want to waste anyone's time.
I did however notice the logic
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:27:43PM -0600, Peter Lai wrote:
On Feb 7, 2011 7:38 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 06:09:16PM -0600, Peter Lai wrote:
Hello
I've got a new Dell Precision workstation here with a BCM5761 on intel
mobo for westmere xeons
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:28:31PM -0600, Peter Lai wrote:
Let me know attached patch makes any difference on your box.
The patch contains some other changes but that wouldn't affect your
BCM5761 controller. If you see CLKREQ enabled message after
applying the patch also let me know that
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:33:47PM -0500, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
Subject: Re: igb driver tx hangs when out of mbuf clusters
To: Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
2011/2/7 Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
Hello, Karim.
You wrote 7
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 06:09:16PM -0600, Peter Lai wrote:
Hello
I've got a new Dell Precision workstation here with a BCM5761 on intel
mobo for westmere xeons that is wedging with interrupt storm and will
lockup the system randomly. I have turned HTT and auto powermanagement
off in bios
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:21:45PM -0500, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
2011/2/7 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:33:47PM -0500, Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
Subject: Re: igb driver tx hangs when out of mbuf clusters
To: Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:54:49PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:01:47 +0100, Ronald Klop
ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to
0
for
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:15:09PM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.01.31 04:08] wrote:
The RTL8168/8111D sample board I have does not show this kind of
issue. This happens only when established link is 1000baseT, right?
I slightly changed PHY's link
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
another detail for this nic
dmidecode
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Product Name: AT5NM10-I
Version: Rev x.0x
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
another detail for this nic
dmidecode
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Product Name: AT5NM10-I
Version: Rev x.0x
Serial Number: MT7006K15200322
uname -a
FreeBSD
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:10PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
another detail for this nic
dmidecode
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:20:32PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
another detail for this nic
dmidecode
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Product Name: AT5NM10-I
Version
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:05:48AM -0800, Huang, Yusheng wrote:
Hi all,
We have ported nfe driver to our product and when we try to set mtu to 9000
on nfe interface, it does not work. No jumbo frame buffer were allocated.
Looking at the code, we found the following:
In nfe_ioctl:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:35:30PM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem with Broadcom NetXtreme (bce) cards:
bce0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x03421014 chip=0x164c14e4
rev=0x12 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device =
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:37:48AM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:26:24PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Since you didn't post dmesg output I'm not sure what kind of
controller you have but I guess it would be NS8381[56]. I
overhauled sis(4) to make
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:38:04AM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0
for these TCP/IP packets?
Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of is
that he could try disabling TSO, etc?)
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:56:15PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:41:22PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
Hi,
Trying to upgrade two Soekris firewalls to 8-STABLE or 8.2-PRERELEASE
it appears that carp doesn't work at all. I've set up carp like I've
done on
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:29:47PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:56:15PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:41:22PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
Hi,
Trying to upgrade two Soekris firewalls to 8-STABLE or 8.2-PRERELEASE
it appears
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:55:01AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18 January 2011 02:03, Monthadar Al Jaberi montha...@gmail.com wrote:
filed a PR http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154091
Thanks.
Network-stack and MIPS guys - what's the best way to handle this kind
of stuff? This
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 08:54:59AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Ronald has reported having a problem with the FreeBSD NFS client using
8.2-prerelease. I've redirected it here, since it looks like there is
a TCP/IP issue that is causing it.
These are the links to the dumps:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:39:25PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:08PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:20:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:24:12AM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:27:13PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:39:25PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:08PM
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:03:03PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 1:45:26:
That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex
media option in your manual configuration.
What do you mean by this? Without this media options it will be
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:36:09AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:47:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex (100baseTX half-duplex)
I can see what's going on here. Link partner used
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:56:19PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 20:32:42:
That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex
media option in your manual configuration.
What do you mean by this? Without this media options it
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:20:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who helps me
diagnose problem!
I've prepared patch, which adds tunable/sysctl
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:59:58PM -0800, Artem Belevich wrote:
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
?Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who helps me
diagnose problem
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:47:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Very large and famous (due to very attractive prices) hosting
provider Hetzner.de discards FreeBSD support on dedicated servers,
because these servers can niot negotiate 100Mbit/DUPLEX when
switches'
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:31:10AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Pyun.
You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 23:00:07:
rgephy(4) currently always use auto-negotiation to work-around link
establishment issues reported in past.
I think, it is the root of the problem. Autonegotiation is
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:10 PM, fbsdm...@dnswatch.com wrote:
Greetings,
I have been receiving these messages on a recent 8.1/AMD64 install.
src/ports world/kern about a week ago. Here is a block from the most
recent output:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204UNDERFLOW
nfe0: tx v2 error
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:56:28PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:35:51AM -0800, Sreekanth M. wrote:
Hi,
I am Sreekanth from Netlogic microsystems.
I am having an issue with msk driver.
It is related to rxcsum.
In freebsd 9
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:35:51AM -0800, Sreekanth M. wrote:
Hi,
I am Sreekanth from Netlogic microsystems.
I am having an issue with msk driver.
It is related to rxcsum.
In freebsd 9, rxcsum is enabled in default for the device I am using on
XLS MIPS board.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:53:16PM -0800, abcde abcde wrote:
Hi, we ported the nvidia ethernet driver to our product.? It's been OK until
recently we?ran into an error condition where packets would get dropped
quietly.
The root cause resides in the nfe_encap() routine, where we call
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:00:08PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
There are pros and cons either way you do things. I was talking to some of
our
Linux crew, they recently changed things so it would shut down the phy, but
that
doesn't always make everyone happy either.
Just saying that my FreeBSD
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:56:42PM +0100, Gabor Radnai wrote:
Hi,
Could someone pls advise how to inject HEAD driver to stable release without
full kernel rebuild (if possible)?
If you have updated to stable/8, the driver code would be the same.
So need to replace driver with HEAD version.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:11:42PM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
I've been trying to get suspend/resume working on my Dell laptop. I have two
if_msk adapters: one's the built-in 100Mb port and the other's a Sonnet Gb
ExpressCard NIC. I've noticed that if I boot with the Gb card installed both
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:09:18AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.11.13 01:01] wrote:
Please be more specific for the issue. Your description is hard to
narrow down possible cause.
i was sure it is the problem of the onboard rt nics
(i.e. dhclient(8) failed to receive
DHCP ACK).
BTW, you still didn't show me the output of ifconfig re0 after UP
the interface(i.e. ifconfig re0 up).
Thanks,
Gabor
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:56:26PM +0100, Gabor Radnai
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:07:59AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Hi,
Gabor Radnai (gabor.rad...@gmail.com) [10.11.11 23:22] wrote:
pciconf:
n...@pci0:0:20:0:class=0x068000 card=0x816a1043 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation'
device =
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:53:38PM +, r...@reckschwardt.de wrote:
here is the pciconf for the onboard Nic
You still didn't post dmesg output. Because there were a lot of
bge(4) changes since 8.1-RELEASE, I think it would be better to try
CURRENT or latest snapshot release and check
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:08:25AM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:34:21PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:10:57AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Kirill Yelizarov ykir...@yahoo.com
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
From: Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net
Subject: Re: icmp packets on em
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:44:31PM +, r...@reckschwardt.de wrote:
Hello YongHyeon,
yes, booth Test-Servers are in idle State, no Disk activity and no
important Networktraffic.
the pciconf -lcbv for the Nics:
e...@pci0:7:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x00db0e11 chip=0x10108086 rev=0x01
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:34:21PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
No, the link stays at 1000Mbps so the driver must manually switch back
to 10/100Mbps.
Hmm, this is real
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:49:14AM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Thanks for the patch. I attached slightly modified the code to
better match other WOL capable drivers in tree. Because data sheet
is not available I
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
No, the link stays at 1000Mbps so the driver must manually switch back
to 10/100Mbps.
Hmm, this is real problem for WOL. Establishing 1000Mbps link to
accept WOL frames is really
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:10:37AM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
Hi,
some time ago we migrated a lot of boxes from Linux to FreeBSD. Those
machines have a NVIDIA nForce4 CK804 MCP4 network adapter, supported
by nfe(4). Even if nfe(4) at least tries to enable the WOL capability of
the NIC
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:09:33PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
Hello!
I have a rather bizarre problem with my on-board sk interface... It only
works, when tcpdump is running...
Seriously. It negotiates with the switch (1000baseT/full-duplex) just
fine, but, unless tcpdump has it open (and
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:15:16AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
I'm running into a rather interesting problem here on HEAD with a newer Asus
EEE PC and the alc network driver. The device works great when a
cable is plugged in, no issues at all. However, if I unplug the ethernet
and reboot then I
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:21:11PM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
Hello,
w/0 polling:
serv1# ifconfig nfe0
nfe0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=10bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,TSO4
ether 00:13:d4:ce:82:16
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:20:10AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
Hi, Freebsd-net.
serv1# ifocnfig nfe0
nfe0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
options=10bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,TSO4
ether 00:13:d4:ce:82:16
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:44:22PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:55:31AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:15:16AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
I'm running into a rather interesting problem here on HEAD with a newer
Asus
EEE PC and the alc
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:30:19PM +0200, Christoph Weber-Fahr wrote:
Hello,
On 07.10.2010 09:07, Дмитрий Александров wrote:
Hi! I really need broadcom 57711E driver for my FreeBSD 8.0 i386.
Does anybody have this driver already?
P.S. Also wanted David Christensen who had previously
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:21:21AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:30:19PM +0200, Christoph Weber-Fahr wrote:
Hello,
On 07.10.2010 09:07, Дмитрий Александров wrote:
Hi! I really need broadcom 57711E driver for my FreeBSD 8.0 i386.
Does anybody have
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:09:33PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
Hello!
I have a rather bizarre problem with my on-board sk interface... It only
works, when tcpdump is running...
Seriously. It negotiates with the switch (1000baseT/full-duplex) just
fine, but, unless tcpdump has it open (and
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:25:08PM +0100, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
On 4 Sep 2010, at 01:53, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:59:26AM +0100, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
Thank you for your very quick response :)
[...]
Also I'd like to know whether both RX and TX
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 05:45:08PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Hi,
sorry not to have replied sooner. Ive been trying to get the end
user to confirm whether he has any issues with the server as it is. He
still hasnt replied :(
I think tho, its likely I will leave the server as is
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:24:45PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com:
Oops, sorry. I forgot one more chunk. You need to apply this one in
addition to two patches.
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/7/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h?r1=202861r2=208995view
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:08:24PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com:
However don't apply the patch to production box.
Hi,
actually the only server of this type is a production box, it was
originally running FreeBSD 7.2 without issue
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:27:13PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com:
Order wouldn't be important but you have to apply both patches.
Hi,
After successfully applying the patchs I get this error when doing a make:
Oops, sorry. I forgot one
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:39:38PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com:
Please apply patch at the following URL and let me know how it goes.
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/7/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?r1=207862r2=208995view=patch
http
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:43:52AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Would it be possible to unhide the output of bce_print_adapter_info()
from under boot verbose?
This information is useful for comparing firmware and card versions
between machines.
Alternatively what about adding a
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:05:08AM -0700, Sushanth Rai wrote:
ifconfig bge1 media none does change the PHY status temporarily. I see the
following when I run this command:
bge1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:48:13PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
What I'd really like to do is revamp the debug code so that it
can be enabled/disabled on the fly rather than requiring that
the driver be compiled. Adding some performance stuff would
Couldn't it be implemented with
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:40:54PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Hi,
we are seeing these errors repeatedly on a new Dell R300 server:
Sep 23 15:06:29 vcomm kernel: bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
Sep 23 15:06:29 vcomm kernel: bge0: link state changed to DOWN
Sep 23 15:06:31 vcomm
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:38:55PM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:31:22PM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:20:03PM +, Josh Endries wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/123172; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Josh Endries j...@endries.org
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/123172: [bce] Watchdog timeout problems with if_bce
Date: Wed,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:27:08PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:18:08PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:10:50PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:28:26PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
Hi,
I have several hosts
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
On 09/09/2010 07:24 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
We are seeing this issue on a number
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
SNIP/
Does this mean that these cards are going to perform badly? This is was
what I gathered from the previous thread
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:11:25PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.09.2010 20:48, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
Without BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT then we see no errors. With it we see number
of errors, however the rate seems to be reduced
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:21:13PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
I'm under the impression the header splitting in bce(4) is for
LRO(opposite of TSO), not for VM magic to enable page flipping
tricks.
Header splitting was implemented in the Linux version of bce(4)
to prevent jumbo memory
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:08:08AM +0300, Vlad Galu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:27:08PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:18:08PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:10
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:28:26PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
Hi,
I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
without issues. One of them, however, is loaded more than others, so it
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:10:50PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:28:26PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
Hi,
I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
without
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
The systems in question are all Dell:
* R710 R610 R410
* PE2950
The latter do
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:59:26AM +0100, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
Thank you for your very quick response :)
[...]
Also I'd like to know whether both RX and TX are dead or only one
RX/TX path is hung. Can you see incoming traffic with tcpdump when
you think the controller is in stuck?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:34:45PM +0800, MAI JIN wrote:
Hi,
I got a freeBSD 8.1 polling issue on my PC. It is a dual-core Intel
Pentium x86 PC (2.8GHz each core). The Ethernet interface is Broadcom
NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Ethernet interface.
I set the following options (enable polling and
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:37:52PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 23 August 2010 18:18, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
It seems the 4k clusters do not get freed back to the pool after they've
been sent by the NIC and dropped from the socket buffer after the ACK has
arrived. ?The
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 23.08.2010 11:26, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 23 August 2010 06:27, Pyun YongHyeonpyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall there was SIOCSIFCAP ioctl handling bug in bce(4) on 8.0 so
it might also disable
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 23.08.2010 19:52, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 23.08.2010 11:26, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 23 August 2010 06:27, Pyun YongHyeonpyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:45:20PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 23.08.2010 21:16, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 23.08.2010 19:52, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
The function
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:22:58PM +, an...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [dc] Adaptec ANA-6922 not fully supported
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net-yongari
Responsible-Changed-By: andre
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 23 18:22:28 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:40:30PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I disabled tso, tx chksum and rx chksum. This fixed the 4k jumbo
allocation growth.
I recall there was SIOCSIFCAP ioctl handling bug in bce(4) on 8.0 so
it might also disable IFCAP_TSO4/IFCAP_TXCSUM/IFCAP_RXCSUM when yo
disabled RX
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:54:49PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:43:46AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Why does the ixgbe loadable show as if_ixgbe, you've altered it?
Only the module Makefile:
# cvs -q diff -u
Index: Makefile
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:50:14PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Hi All,
can enybody help with the subj, please?
problem: onboard interface re0 link state UP/DOWN flapping
i have:
# uname -a
FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 9 10:33:17 EEST 2010 amd64
# dmidecode
...
Base Board
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Victor Ophof wrote:
From: pyu...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:37:54 -0700
To: mr4hu...@hotmail.com
CC: j...@freebsd.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RX ring hdr initialization error
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:52:56PM +0200,
, once you have it tweaked you
can
make it static again if you wish.
He used default TX/RX ring size.
Jack
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Victor Ophof wrote:
From: pyu...@gmail.com
Date
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:34:07PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
oh, i forgoten :(
dmesg.boot contains:
re0: RealTek 8168/8168B/8168C/8168CP/8168D/8111B/8111C/8111CP PCIe Gigabit
Ethernet port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfafff000-0xfaff,0xfaff8000-0xfaffbfff
irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:27:48PM -0400, Tom Pusateri wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.08.11 19:31] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:50:14PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Hi All,
can enybody help with the subj
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:24:56PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.08.11 23:09] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:34:07PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
oh, i forgoten :(
dmesg.boot contains:
re0: RealTek 8168/8168B/8168C/8168CP/8168D/8111B
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:57:22AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:23:26AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Thanks Jeremy, from that we get:-
i...@pci0:1:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x060015d9 chip=0x10c98086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:52:56PM +0200, Victor Ophof wrote:
Hi
I've bought a asus M4a78-EM Motherboard. to build a NAS on,
thinking the onboard Realtek would be sufficant speed
unfortunatly the onboard fives 16/31 mbs at best
ps later It improved with enabeling polling in
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:14:22AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-net.
I have huge losses (netstat -s -p tcp shows 4% of packets, but
35% of bytes are retransmitted) on my intenret connection, which is PPPoE
over
100Mbit ehternet link. Provider claims, that it
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:32:34AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
A reboot with connected cable follows this evening.
A reboot with connected cable was booting successfully.
Would you show me verbose dmesg output?
With verbose boot alc(4) will show additional information which may
help
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:06:05PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
A reboot with connected cable follows this evening.
A reboot with connected cable was booting successfully.
Would you show me verbose dmesg output?
With verbose boot alc(4) will show additional information which
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
http://opsec.eu/backup/alc-bug/dmesg.boot-verbose
One odd thing is alc(4) failed to read station address from EEPROM.
So alc(4) assumed BIOS correctly programmed station address but the
station address looks wrong to
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:25:36AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Because of the SFP+ design it requires init before it really 'comes up' :)
Glad its working for you.
I guess you can disable showing no carrier if driver is not
running. Showing negotiated speed/duplex link state when driver is
not
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
