-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of prad
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:00 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: why an old operating system
in our search for servers we contacted genstor (on the freebsd
compatible hardware
Coming from the Linux world I am pretty new to FreeBSD, please bare with me.
I find the FreeBSD handbook pretty useful and I just managed to update
7.0-RELEASE to 7-STABLE from source. I have an Intel core4quad CPU and was
wondering if I now have a 64bit FreeBSD. I am a bit confused because from
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
Coming from the Linux world I am pretty new to FreeBSD, please bare with me.
I find the FreeBSD handbook pretty useful and I just managed to update
7.0-RELEASE to 7-STABLE from source. I have an Intel core4quad CPU and was
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:56:06 +0200
Sandra Kachelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming from the Linux world I am pretty new to FreeBSD, please bare with me.
I find the FreeBSD handbook pretty useful and I just managed to update
7.0-RELEASE to 7-STABLE from source. I have an Intel core4quad CPU
I am trying to use this alias in my root .cshrc file:
grep $1 /some/file
but .cshrc _refuses_ to expand $1 as a proper variable (in this case, the first
argument to the alias...)
I _think_ it's because $1 is being interpreted as a argument to csh _itself_
when it runs .cshrc ... but maybe
At 07:04 AM 6/26/2008, Juri Mianovich wrote:
I am trying to use this alias in my root .cshrc file:
grep $1 /some/file
but .cshrc _refuses_ to expand $1 as a proper variable (in this case, the
first argument to the alias...)
I _think_ it's because $1 is being interpreted as a argument to
Hello,
First off sorry for the cross-post. I typically don't do this
but this is an important question, so please bear with me. I'm just
trying to get more eyes on the subject so I can (maybe) get a reply
quicker...
I'm running 8-CURRENT on my machine and it appears that one of
the
Most GOOD RAID cards will let you rebuild an array from the card BIOS outside
the OS.
Some will even do it automatically, if you replace the failed drive, while the
system is fully up and running (of course it slaughters your drive access speed
while it rebuilds the data on the new drive)
If
At 08:49 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
First off sorry for the cross-post. I typically don't do this
but this is an important question, so please bear with me. I'm just
trying to get more eyes on the subject so I can (maybe) get a reply
quicker...
I'm running 8-CURRENT
- Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:49 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
First off sorry for the cross-post. I typically don't do this
but this is an important question, so please bear with me. I'm just
trying to get more eyes on the subject so I can (maybe)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Juri Mianovich wrote:
| I am trying to use this alias in my root .cshrc file:
|
| grep $1 /some/file
|
| but .cshrc _refuses_ to expand $1 as a proper variable (in this case,
the first argument to the alias...)
|
| I _think_ it's because $1 is
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:49 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
First off sorry for the cross-post. I typically don't do this
but this is an important question, so please bear with
At 09:38 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:49 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
First off sorry for the cross-post. I typically don't do this
but this
Derek Ragona wrote:
At 09:38 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:49 AM 6/26/2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
First off sorry for the cross-post. I typically
At 2008-06-26T05:04:52-07:00, Juri Mianovich wrote:
I am trying to use this alias in my root .cshrc file:
grep $1 /some/file
but .cshrc _refuses_ to expand $1 as a proper variable (in this
case, the first argument to the alias...)
I _think_ it's because $1 is being interpreted as a
I have had those exact problems with my removable tray.
Try eliminating the tray for a while and see...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Ragona
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:23 PM
To: Marcel Grandemange
Cc:
Ad2 is the only one out of the troubled drives that is in a bay that seems
to be giving issues.
And when replacing it with the 20gb issues went away.
Im considering changing motherboards from the MSI im using to an intel.
Mabey FreeBSD has issues with the via chipset used for the IDE Sata
Hello,
I'm having issues upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0. The box in questions
is running 7.0-STABLE i386.
The error message I'm receiving is...
=== Configuring for gnutls-2.4.0
aclocal.m4:16: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.62.
You have another version of autoconf. It
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having issues upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0. The box in questions is
running 7.0-STABLE i386.
The error message I'm receiving is...
=== Configuring for gnutls-2.4.0
aclocal.m4:16: warning: this file was
Schiz0 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having issues upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0. The box in questions is
running 7.0-STABLE i386.
The error message I'm receiving is...
=== Configuring for gnutls-2.4.0
aclocal.m4:16: warning:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Schiz0 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having issues upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0. The box in questions
is
running 7.0-STABLE i386.
The error message I'm
Hello,
I am using FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE and an intel 2100 wireless mini-pci
card. The wireless connection is to a linksys router which then
connects to a second router that acts as a DHCP server and gateway.
The commands I use to start are the following:
wpa_supplicant -D bsd -i ipw0 -c
Hello,
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that changes wallpapers on your desktop but it is only available for
Windows.
As a FreeBSD fan, I'd love to see it in ports. Can anyone recommend
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:55:08 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems upgrading GNUTLS
2.2.2 to 2.4.0 Schiz0 wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Doug
Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm having issues
upgrading
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
--
In friendship,
prad
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:17:19 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Windows Unix volunteers Hello,
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme that
At 11:17 AM 6/26/2008, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme that
changes wallpapers on your desktop but it is only available for Windows.
As a FreeBSD fan, I'd
Resending since my last email got horribly garbled up.
there are a few programs like this already. some people even just use cron jobs
with a script to force a background change to a random image every X
minutes.graphics/chbg is a nice start. just do a google search or search
Derek Ragona wrote:
At 01:17 PM 6/25/2008, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Hello list :)
I have a problem with my so called server, i'm using FreeBSD
7.0-RELEASE. I connect to it trough ssh because i'm not in that
location. Everything is ok i'm using /usr/sbin/ppp to connect to the
internet as i have
At 2008-06-26T18:17:19+02:00, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that changes wallpapers on your desktop but it is only available for
Windows.
As a FreeBSD fan, I'd
unsubscribe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
N. Raghavendra:
At 2008-06-26T18:17:19+02:00, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that changes wallpapers on your desktop but it is only available for
Windows.
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
I seriously doubt that. Maybe if you take a single old first
generation SCSI disk and compare it to a modern IDE drive. But that's
not exactly comparing apples to apples.
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:44:38 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows Unix
volunteers Hi all, N. Raghavendra: At 2008-06-26T18:17:19+02:00,
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:What is a good place to look for volunteers
who
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
SATA are too.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
the performance are similar by interfaces, SCSI drives tend to have higher
RPM and faster heads and can be 30-50% faster for 5 times higher price.
At 11:25 AM 6/26/2008, prad wrote:
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
--
In friendship,
In response to prad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
There was
Quoting David Gurvich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I am using FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE and an intel 2100 wireless mini-pci
card. The wireless connection is to a linksys router which then
connects to a second router that acts as a DHCP server and gateway.
I have the same set up and my linksys serves
A further note: If I run remove the '-B' option and add '-d',
wpa_supplicant does disassociate but rapidly reassociates on it's own.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
At 12:04 PM 6/26/2008, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Derek Ragona wrote:
At 01:17 PM 6/25/2008, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Hello list :)
I have a problem with my so called server, i'm using FreeBSD
7.0-RELEASE. I connect to it trough ssh because i'm not in that
location. Everything is ok i'm using
Quoting David Gurvich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A further note: If I run remove the '-B' option and add '-d',
wpa_supplicant does disassociate but rapidly reassociates on it's own.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
prad wrote:
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
Prad,
Have a look at this URL:
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:55:08 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0
Schiz0 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
What do I need to avoid making the same mistake of having mailgraph
installing files at the wrong location in my system?
The default location in Makefile is this:
CGIDIR?=${PREFIX}/www/cgi-bin
DATADIR?= /var/db/mailgraph
Quoting David Gurvich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A further note: If I run remove the '-B' option and add '-d',
wpa_supplicant does disassociate but rapidly reassociates on it's own.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I have been put in charge of creating a single sign-on mechanism for our
Windows 2003 and FreeBSD servers. We are wanting to use Active Directory as
our LDAP server. I know of four different methods that could possibly work.
1. OpenLDAP
2. Radius
3. NIS
4. WinBind / Samba
Which is the most
At 02:20 PM 6/26/2008, Chris Edwards wrote:
I have been put in charge of creating a single sign-on mechanism for our
Windows 2003 and FreeBSD servers. We are wanting to use Active Directory as
our LDAP server. I know of four different methods that could possibly work.
1. OpenLDAP
2. Radius
3.
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
--
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as everywhere else.
Kris
___
System built from today's sources.
FreeBSD vidar.i.inter-sonic.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Thu
Jun 26 21:27:20 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VIDAR amd64
Making install in tests
test -z /usr/local/info/ || ../../build-aux/install-sh -c -d
/usr/local/info/
At 12:44 PM 6/26/2008, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hi all,
N. Raghavendra:
At 2008-06-26T18:17:19+02:00, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that changes wallpapers on
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as everywhere else.
Kris
So, I take it that this means that all
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as everywhere else.
Kris
So, I take it that
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as everywhere else.
Kris
--
From: Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:51 PM
To: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD Mailing List
freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Making World For amd64
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:53:00 +0200
Jos Chrispijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at this URL:
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
this was very interesting and thorough.
and thanks to everyone else who responded especially david and bill.
unfortunately, david, most of the links
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
--
From: Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:51 PM
To: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD Mailing List
freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Making World For amd64
Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:51:40PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as
Erik Trulsson wrote:
1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
It will build for whatever system you have installed.
If you are running a 32-bit system it will make 32-bit binaries, and if
you are running a 64-bit system it will make 64-bit binaries.
By
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:51:40PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the
I'm pretty fed up with Intel's ICH9R interface too so I'm hoping
(crosses fingers) that I'll be able to afford an Adaptec card of some
flavor that's compatible with -CURRENT.
If you are looking to move up, look at the 3ware RAID cards. Not sure
which models work with FreeBSD, but these card
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 07:44:38PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hi all,
N. Raghavendra:
At 2008-06-26T18:17:19+02:00, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that
we have a chance to buy 18G scsi at $5 or 36G for $25.
with THAT price - SCSI make sense :)
what the seller isn't sure about is whether they will be compatible
with the particular server.
SCSI is SCSI. unless the device doesn't comply to standards (unlikely) it
just works!
Hi,
this week I got server with Intel(R) RAID Controller SRCS16 8 port
SATA RAID controller, which needed to be reinstalled.
After backing all data and reinstall, I noticed that writing to logical
drives almost never exceeds 700 bytes/sec. Testing with dd :
dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/test.dat
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
It always uses the native format. amd64 == 64 bit, i386 == 32 bit
Don't mean to beat this to death, but can you say just a bit more
about this please.
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:59:15 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SCSI is SCSI. unless the device doesn't comply to standards
(unlikely) it just works!
thanks wojciech!
i also came across the following in this article from 1999:
Seagate is committed to Ultra3 SCSI and plans
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:29:20PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Erik Trulsson wrote:
1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
It will build for whatever system you have installed.
If you are running a 32-bit system it will make 32-bit binaries, and if
you
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
we have a chance to buy 18G scsi at $5 or 36G for $25.
with THAT price - SCSI make sense :)
what the seller isn't sure about is whether they will be compatible
with the particular server.
SCSI is SCSI. unless the
At 03:59 PM 6/26/2008, prad wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:53:00 +0200
Jos Chrispijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at this URL:
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
this was very interesting and thorough.
and thanks to everyone else who responded especially david and bill.
Just installed FBSD 7, after being gone from FBSD the last 3 years.
During boot I see that the mouse is detected as ums0, but cannot get it
to work in X11. I cannot find any xorg.conf. or xorg.conf.new files. I
have gnome installed and working, so I know X is working properly. Any
suggestions
On Thursday 26 June 2008 20:49:46 Chip wrote:
Just installed FBSD 7, after being gone from FBSD the last 3 years.
During boot I see that the mouse is detected as ums0, but cannot get it
to work in X11. I cannot find any xorg.conf. or xorg.conf.new files. I
have gnome installed and working, so
My /etc/X11 directory is empty, so do I create a new file called
xorg.conf and just try the code you have in it?
Thanks.
Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 20:49:46 Chip wrote:
Just installed FBSD 7, after being gone from FBSD the last 3 years.
During boot I see that the mouse
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:44:38 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI - our little software is special one in that it changes
backgrounds with Bible's life words
(www.lcwords.com/en/desktoplive.html).
http://www.lcwords.com/en/save_wallpaper/wisdom,174.html
Notice the bottom
On Thursday 26 June 2008 16:17:19 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that changes wallpapers on your desktop but it is only available for
Windows.
Is the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:43:15AM +, Pollywog wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 16:17:19 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
What is a good place to look for volunteers who would like to modify
Windows source code for an open source software. We have a programme
that changes wallpapers
No ..
Run a locate xorg.conf to see what xorg.conf file is beign used to run
gnome ..
Check under /usr/local/etc/X11 to see if there's xorg.conf ..
If you are running gnome .. _there_has_to_be_ a xorg.conf file somewhere ...
Find that file a do your edits in there.
And BTW .. the code I passed
I ran update.locatedb, twice, and ran locate xorg.conf and locate
xorg.conf.new. The only result was for xorg.conf found in
/usr/local/man/man5/xorg.conf.5.gz
--
Chip
Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
No ..
Run a locate xorg.conf to see what xorg.conf file is beign used to run
gnome ..
Check under
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:19 am, Chip wrote:
Just installed FBSD 7, after being gone from FBSD the last 3 years.
During boot I see that the mouse is detected as ums0, but cannot get it
to work in X11. I cannot find any xorg.conf. or xorg.conf.new files. I
have gnome installed and working, so I
--On June 26, 2008 6:34:37 PM -0700 Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran update.locatedb, twice, and ran locate xorg.conf and locate
xorg.conf.new. The only result was for xorg.conf found in
/usr/local/man/man5/xorg.conf.5.gz
You need to run, as root, # Xorg -configure and create an xorg.conf
,--- Chip writes:
| Just installed FBSD 7, after being gone from FBSD the last 3
| years. During boot I see that the mouse is detected as ums0, but
| cannot get it to work in X11. I cannot find any xorg.conf. or
| xorg.conf.new files. I have gnome installed and working, so I know X
| is working
Yes, it is enabled and also have usbd_enable set to YES and mouse_type
set to AUTO and mouse_port set to /dev/ums0 (which shows on the boot up
screen and it shows my exact mouse brand and model).
--
Chip
Malcolm Kay wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:19 am, Chip wrote:
Just installed FBSD 7,
Thanks for the tip, did that, and verified that the mouse is set to auto
in the mouse section, still no mouse in any X window manager. Back out
at the terminal I unplugged the mouse and plugged it back in and get
this error -
unable to open /dev/ums0: no such file or directory
but when I view
Chip wrote:
Thanks for the tip, did that, and verified that the mouse is set to
auto in the mouse section, still no mouse in any X window manager.
Back out at the terminal I unplugged the mouse and plugged it back in
and get this error -
unable to open /dev/ums0: no such file or directory
but
Ok, it's working now, thanks for all the suggestions, you got me
straightened out. Once I got a xorg.conf.new configured correctly I
forgot to copy it to /etc/X11. Dummy me, heheheh. (Been a long time
since my last experience with BSD, about 3 years.)
Thanks guys,
Chip
Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
--On June 26, 2008 7:52:07 PM -0700 Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tip, did that, and verified that the mouse is set to auto
in the mouse section, still no mouse in any X window manager. Back out
at the terminal I unplugged the mouse and plugged it back in and get
this error -
Paul Schmehl wrote:
What version of FreeBSD are you running?
7.0-Release
If 7.0 STABLE, you should probably csup source and rebuild kernel and
world. I had a similar problem with the early release and it was
related to usb devices not being detected (which sounds like what your
problem
93 matches
Mail list logo
