On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on
RELENG_5.
Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to
-STABLE (and traditionally, this point of the release cycle is not
a good time to be running -STABLE).
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on
RELENG_5.
Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to
-STABLE (and traditionally, this
Hi,
So, after yesterday I`ve succesfully solved the problem with:
mount -t msdos /dev/ad1sX /mnt/X (x = 5)
thank you 4 your help,
Jan Sebosik
Remo Lacho wrote:
On 2/27/2005 at 2:40 AM Jan Sebosik wrote:
Hi
When I disklabel -r /dev/ad1s2 (the first extended slice), i get :a:
13518691262
Hi,
I'm running 5.3 STABLE.
I need to change the MAC address of my PC.
I know it can be done like this:
ifconfig rl0 ether 11:22:33:44:55:66
So I guessed I could make life a little easier by
adding this in my /etc/rc.conf file as:
ifconfig_rl0=inet 192.168.123.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
On Sunday, 27. February 2005 02:06, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
How about adjusting the configuration then?
There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
display `quivers' --for
On 2/27/2005 at 12:31 PM Jan Sebosik wrote:
Hi,
So, after yesterday I`ve succesfully solved the problem with:
mount -t msdos /dev/ad1sX /mnt/X (x = 5)
thank you 4 your help,
Jan Sebosik
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
Your welcome!
Just remember that in the land of the blind the
On Thursday 24 February 2005 16:14, Uzi Klein wrote:
True,
I couldn't find anything has to do with SATA Raid @
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html
Regards Björn
Anything with a Silicon Image 3114 chip seems to work
atapci1: SiI 3114 SATA150 controller port
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:54:49 -0800 (PST), Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm running 5.3 STABLE.
I need to change the MAC address of my PC.
I know it can be done like this:
ifconfig rl0 ether 11:22:33:44:55:66
So I guessed I could make life a little easier by
adding this in
If you've been having memory modified after free panics on -current
and have a Thinkpad, the attached patch should fix things for you. A
quick check of RELENG_5 indicates that the bug is probably there also
but I haven't tested for it there.
The bug is triggered by timeouts in the
On 2005.02.27 11:56:06 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
If you've been having memory modified after free panics on -current
and have a Thinkpad, the attached patch should fix things for you. A
quick check of RELENG_5 indicates that the bug is probably there also
but I haven't tested for it there.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyway. It
didn't
John Nielsen wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 06:38 pm, David J. Hughes wrote:
On 26/02/2005, at 7:28 PM, John Pettitt wrote:
I'm thinking about moving one of my servers to a new home (it's
currently at servepath.com on a FreeBSD 5.0 box) - does anybody know of
a reputable hosting company
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop never exits when mask
goes to 0 even though this is a termination condition (see end of the
loop where
From: John Pettitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm thinking about moving one of my servers to a new home (it's
currently at servepath.com on a FreeBSD 5.0 box) - does anybody know of
a reputable hosting company that's offering 5.3 boxes?
...
So, hosting with servepath.com may well lead to restricted
Is nice broken?
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 14:17:21 EET 2005
# nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:54:55 +0200, Lefteris Tsintjelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is nice broken?
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 14:17:21 EET 2005
# nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
$ uname -v
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sun
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:54:55AM +0200, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
Is nice broken?
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 14:17:21 EET 2005
# nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
which nice
nice: shell built-in command.
/usr/bin/nice -n 5
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writes:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds).
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know he
plans to
Nate Lawson wrote:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds). The bug is that the loop never exits when mask
goes to 0 even though this is a termination condition (see end of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:02:28 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ uname -v
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Feb 27 10:36:40 CET 2005 {snip}
$ nice -n 5 date
Sun 27 Feb 2005 23:59:37 CET
Yes, but you weren't using the
On Sunday, 27. February 2005 23:54, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
Is nice broken?
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 14:17:21 EET 2005
# nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
csh has a builtin nice command, with a different syntax than nice(1).
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writes:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds).
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writes:
My system hangs a long time in ata_generic_reset() while resuming. I
did some hunting and found that the loop was running for the full 310 *
100 ms (31 seconds).
On 26/02/2005, at 7:28 PM, John Pettitt wrote:
I'm thinking about moving one of my servers to a new home (it's
currently at servepath.com on a FreeBSD 5.0 box) - does anybody know of
a reputable hosting company that's offering 5.3 boxes?
aplus.net has 5.3 dedicated servers
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I think you can trust sos@ to not do anything to the stuff in the tree
until he sticks the new stuff in there, so testing his patches like he
asked for is better use of your time.
Nate's patch looks straightforward enough to me. I'd like to see it
I know www.johncompanies.com will be offering 5.x soon. I've had a
4.x
jail with them for quite some time and am very happy with the service
and support.
I second that. Their service is hands-down the best I've ever had for
anything technology-related.
And from the social conscience point of
No, the problem's the other way round. Every time I want to
portupgrade something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg. I
don't want the latest Xorg after the horror stories I heard.
That's why I'm building firefox-1.0.1 independently of the ports
system, so that I don't have to go
I'm working on a small app that talks to a device with a FTDI USB to 232 chip in it. ucom
and uftdi seem to detect it just fine. But calls to read() hang and I'm getting messages
like putc to a clist with no reserved cblocks in my kernel logs. Any idea
what this is?
In a previous post (subject:
At 3:19 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know
he plans to commit those shortly.
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he will
be getting back around March 5th (assuming I understand what
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:14, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
I'm working on a small app that talks to a device with a FTDI USB to 232
chip in it. ucom and uftdi seem to detect it just fine. But calls to read()
hang and I'm getting messages like putc to a clist with no reserved
cblocks in my kernel logs.
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:14, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
I'm working on a small app that talks to a device with a FTDI USB to 232
chip in it. ucom and uftdi seem to detect it just fine. But calls to read()
hang and I'm getting messages like putc to a clist with no reserved
cblocks
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Rob wrote:
I'm running 5.3 STABLE.
I need to change the MAC address of my PC.
I know it can be done like this:
ifconfig rl0 ether 11:22:33:44:55:66
So I guessed I could make life a little easier by
adding this in my /etc/rc.conf file as:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 3:19 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know
he plans to commit those shortly.
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he will
be getting back around March 5th
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:36:43AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
How about adjusting the configuration then?
There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
display `quivers'
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ?
yes. they break resume on a thinkpad t41 and now seem to break
my pcmcia cf insert (see other email).
but otherwise, i like them a lot!
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
This seems to work well. I used it with audio/ifp-line for my MP3
player and with graphics/gphoto2 for my camera. No problems at all. It
was a perfect drop in replacement for 0.1.7. All I had to do was add a
symlink because of the version number differences.
PDQ
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:57
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:55, Gary Kline wrote:
FYI X.Org should have just used your XF86-4 config file by default.
XF86Config bombed instantly, even with startx.
This afternoon after hours of testing one-change-at-a-time
I found that the DefaultDepth of 8 is at least one
Greetings...
I recently build world and kernel with ipfw support. Can someone
provide examples on how to use these options (verrevpath, versrcreach
and antispoof). What can they be used for and can't! and how to use
them (proper syntax).
Execuse my poor english! I am knew to FreeBSD and UNIX /
I hope I am sending this post to the right mailing list !!!
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:06:58 +0200, abu khaled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings...
I recently build world and kernel with ipfw support. Can someone
provide examples on how to use these options (verrevpath, versrcreach
and
Godwin Stewart napisa(a):
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
One of the things I've been doing is to record some of my old cassettes
(you know, those old plastic
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
DA I haven't tried using vinum with my patch set. That might be a problem.
DA I'm not sure if anyone has tried vinum with my patch set most people use
DA ata-raid if anything at all.
I missed: the first machine I tried your patchset at uses vinum for
41 matches
Mail list logo
