On 2007-Feb-12 16:07:03 +1030, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regularly ship systems overseas where the power fails frequently. The
inability to boot because one disk got hosed is Bad News (tm).
A decent UPS can help here.
It depends on your exact situation, I was just pointing out
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:22:22 -0800 (PST) Rob wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 PC as the server to a PXE boot
of another Compaq Deskpro EN PC.
The Compaq PC has the option of a Network Service
Boot with the F12-key during BIOS boot up. On the
server, tftpd, bootpd and dhcpd are all working well.
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Thanks
Jeff
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On 2007-Feb-12 16:07:03 +1030, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regularly ship systems overseas where the power fails frequently. The
inability to boot because one disk got hosed is Bad News (tm).
A decent UPS can help here.
No, i can't. I have seen UPS (even APC) fail in some
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Thanks
Jeff
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
yesterday, I tried to build kernel and world with the gjournal patch. It
does not apply cleanly. This brings me to question, are there some
outstanding issues that prevent it from being commited to RELENG_6? I
tried to search ml archives but I did not find any.
--
nope
but it was flawless on 5.5 with tomcat
regards,
wlodek
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/12/07, Jeffrey Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Yes, and it works OK. I also happen to run the java/jdk15 port and
it runs just as smoothly. You can ask the port maintainer about the
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
There's information around PPP that's not been communicated or
documented well. The 'performance' way to do PPP on FreeBSD is to go off
and run MPD, because it has the right compromise between doing low-level
packet shunting in the kernel,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:55:06AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Thanks
Jeff
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
(please CC me, I'm not subscribed)
I'm currently working on a freebsd box I've inherited from the former admin,
and been tasked with
installing new hard disks on sata.
Currently, it has a scsi disk containing the system and an ide disk containing
the data partitions
(it's a file server).
Rob wrote:
Is it OK to have a double kernel read at the last
two lines?
Any idea what's wrong here or what I could do to
further test what the actual problem is?
Argh. I had this same problem as recently as October, but I can't
remember exactly what caused this. When I went back and re-did
Just a note to say the February 2007 Monthly Snapshots are completed and
available at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/200702/;.
With the FreeBSD-6.2 release cycle over we're now back to doing RELENG_6
snapshots as well as the HEAD snapshots.
Sums:
MD5
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Kevin Way wrote:
I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts that caused
this
command to be executed:
On 2/10/07, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy!
I tried to install 6.2 amd64 on external usb hdd, but with no result.
It is 2.5 WD and enclosure with two usb connectors for power. The box
is not visible from bios at all, even when I use powered usb hub. Is
it possible to install on
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Thanks
Jeff
Just reinstalled my workstation at the office at the beginning of the
year with 6.2 and installed the diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01 binary package.
Been running fine
Hi Andy!
IIRC, you can only install to drives that the bios can see. You could
try finding a computer whose bios can see the drive and installing
from there. As long as you don't touch the internal drives on that
machine, everything *should* be safe. YMMV
Huh! My bios sees usb flash stick
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:14:20 +0100
Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andy!
IIRC, you can only install to drives that the bios can see. You could
try finding a computer whose bios can see the drive and installing
from there. As long as you don't touch the internal drives on that
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Changing the behaviour of tools always involves a certain
danegr of breaking existing script. That's especially true
for symstem administration commands such as ifconfig that
are running in automated scripts, and people depend on
How big is the drive? Perhaps it is too large for the BIOS?
I hate myself posting so frequently, without anything smart to say.
Drive is 40 Gb on 5400. I will go tomorrow to the servicer, maybe
the drive is failing. If not, could be perfect flying saucer.
Hi list,
I'm trying ot install FBSD on USB flash (2.0) SanDisk 512MB. The
procedure went good - I see first stage of the loader (which slice to
boot from) and then continuously scrolling assembler data registers.
My target is simple - booting FBSD from USB flash. I've tried tutorial
from :
I made few steps again and got this errors:
Fist put hdd into Chieftec enclosure IU250 and got:
uhub2: device problem (IOERROR), disabling port 6
Then hdd is in canyon enclosure:
Feb 12 16:58:23 faust kernel: uhub2: device problem (TIMEOUT), disabling port 6
Feb 12 16:58:31 faust kernel:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[...]
The -alias parameter simply removes an address from an
interface. The term alias should really be avoided
because it is misleading. You can use delete or remove
which do the same thing. I think -alias should really
be regarded
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has
existed historically, and the term alias is what is used in
reference to rc.conf ifconfig_iface_aliasX entries.
On Monday 12 February 2007 01:25 am, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Working fine on my 6.1-RELEASE laptop that was upgraded to 6.2-RELEASE
(without upgrading the JRE package).
--
Freddie Cash
[EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0600, Jaime Bozza wrote:
I want to second the recommendation for Areca controllers. We have two
systems - The first is using an 1160 (16-port PCI-x) with 16 400GB
drives, the 2nd is using the newer 1261ML card (16 port PCI Express,
mini SAS connectors) with
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:22:59PM +0200, Todorov @ Paladin wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying ot install FBSD on USB flash (2.0) SanDisk 512MB. The
procedure went good - I see first stage of the loader (which slice to
boot from) and then continuously scrolling assembler data registers.
My target
Jaime, can you expand a bit about what sort-of motherboard you
installed the 1261ML in? I've yet to find any mainstream motherboards
which have a PCIe x8 slot. Most have x1, some have x4, and many
have x16. I've seen one Supermicro board which has a x8 slot but
is only wired for x4 (has 4
On Monday 12 February 2007 12:26, Oliver Fromme wrote:
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig nic -alias is obviously a wired and confusing behaviour
It might be confusing to you. Personally I think that the
current behaviour isn't that far off.
the question is not you or me, I
Jeremy Chadwick написа:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:22:59PM +0200, Todorov @ Paladin wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying ot install FBSD on USB flash (2.0) SanDisk 512MB. The
procedure went good - I see first stage of the loader (which slice to
boot from) and then continuously scrolling assembler
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has
existed historically, and the term alias is what is used in
reference to rc.conf ifconfig_iface_aliasX entries.
Maybe it
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has
existed historically, and the term alias is what is used in
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig nic -alias is obviously a wired and confusing behaviour
It might be confusing to you. Personally I think that the
current behaviour isn't that far off.
the question is not
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
ipv4_addrs_interface is a much better replacement IMO. It's easy to
use and doesn't required the hackish pseudo array traversal used by
ifconfig_iface_aliasX.
That might work for simple cases, but how do you
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
ipv4_addrs_interface is a much better replacement IMO. It's easy to
use and doesn't required the hackish pseudo array traversal used by
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
What do you need to set? It's sets IP and netmask. It doesn't handle
broadcast, but I'd be pretty suprised if that's needed often. What else
is needed? Axing ifconfig_iface_aliasX is not needed, but reducing the
visiability of
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:07:39AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
What do you need to set? It's sets IP and netmask. It doesn't handle
broadcast, but I'd be pretty suprised if that's needed often. What else
is needed? Axing
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
FWIW, I still use alias/-alias. Mainly because that's what has
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:27:36PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:07:39AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Does it support media and mediaopt arguments? These are very
commonly used. I also rely on this, for what it's worth:
openvpn_enable=yes
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:06:59PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
yesterday, I tried to build kernel and world with the gjournal patch. It
does not apply cleanly. This brings me to question, are there some
outstanding issues that prevent it from being commited to RELENG_6? I
tried to search ml archives but I did not find any.
On Monday 12 February 2007 11:06 am, John Hay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:39:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:09, Oliver Fromme wrote:
it is not misleading and it is a perfect term. With alias you add
secondary addresses to an interface. Like secondary is probably the
better word,
No, not at all. As soon as you use the terms primary IP
address and secondary IP
We tested the latest version (1.2.2.12) of the driver on Friday (Feb 9,
2007), but could not get the interfaces up.
Has anybody managed to get the network interfaces up and running with this
latest version of the driver?
Thanks,
Pentti
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:27, Brooks Davis wrote:
Setting media options and the like via _aliasesX variables makes no
sense and you don't appear to be doing it so I'm confused by your
question. The ifconfig_iface_aliasX syntax exists to add IPv4 addresses
to an interface. New
Hi !
We tested the latest version (1.2.2.12) of the driver on Friday (Feb 9,
2007), but could not get the interfaces up.
Has anybody managed to get the network interfaces up and running with this
latest version of the driver?
Brooks Davis wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
True, not often, but sometimes. I had cases like that in
certain environments with bridged networks and arp proxies.
I'm fine with your proposed syntax, as long as all the
existing ifconfig possibilities continue to be possible,
i.e.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:39:16 +0100
Jost Menke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first of all, I think installation won't be possible with the
menu-driven installer (sysinstall), so you'll have to do this
manually (i.e. by using the install.sh scripts on the CD and creating
rc.conf fstab and the like
Oliver Fromme wrote:
In the case of adding something, what should be added if
nothing is specified? Should the tool invent an arbitrary
IP address and add it? Now that would be nonsensical.
But when removing something without specifying which one,
it makes some sense to simply remove the
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:11:42PM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
On 2007-Feb-12 16:07:03 +1030, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I regularly ship systems overseas where the power fails frequently. The
inability to boot because one disk got hosed is Bad News (tm).
A decent UPS can
Oliver Fromme wrote:
But you called it confusing. That's just your personal
perception. It doesn't mean it is confusing to everybody.
If asked what -alias does, would you really reply it removes the
primary IP,
while leaving the alias? Be honest here.
Also note that it doesn't hurt
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the problem here is that
ifconfig_nic=inet IP
ifconfig_nic=ether MAC
does not work on one line and does not work on two either, the latter
overrides and or you get an IP address with original MAC or you get a
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:37:53AM +0100, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the problem here is that
ifconfig_nic=inet IP
ifconfig_nic=ether MAC
does not work on one line and does not work on two either, the latter
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 11:06 am, John Hay wrote:
Also with the atheros driver I had problems in the past with some
parameters that did not like to be on a single commandline.
At least with the ath(4) driver, it all comes down to the order the
options are written on
On Mon, February 12, 2007 8:01 pm, Sam Leffler wrote:
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 11:06 am, John Hay wrote:
Also with the atheros driver I had problems in the past with some
parameters that did not like to be on a single commandline.
At least with the ath(4) driver, it
On Monday 12 February 2007 22:37, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the problem here is that
ifconfig_nic=inet IP
ifconfig_nic=ether MAC
does not work on one line and does not work on two either, the latter
overrides
Kevin Way wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
But you called it confusing. That's just your personal
perception. It doesn't mean it is confusing to everybody.
If asked what -alias does, would you really reply it removes the
primary IP,
while leaving the alias? Be honest here.
No,
57 matches
Mail list logo
