Tom Samplonius wrote:
- Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any alternative solutions that would provide a
more
reliable environment other than PAE?
Besideds PAE some people have mentioned running an amd64 system.
One thing to consider is that PAE in 6-stable
Does anyone have any alternative solutions that would provide a more
reliable environment other than PAE?
I was faced with a similar problem last autmumn - we had been running 6.2
on a set of servers with 4 gig or RAM, but purchased new servers with
16 gig in them. I experimented with various
On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:56 AM, Tom Samplonius wrote:
And is there some really stability fear about FreeBSD on x86-64?
Seems just the same as i386.
Some poorly written software fails to run properly in 64-bit
environment. I have one such package, and my solution was to compile
it on a
Kevin K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386
FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb.
Several people have already pointed out that you can either
run FreeBSD/i386+PAE or FreeBSD/amd64 (64bit).
However, there's an important piece of
Tom Samplonius wrote:
Is PAE really that stable? I thought it was fairly unpolished, mainly
because PAE is seen as a weak kludge implemented by Intel because they all
thought we would all be using Itanium's by now. Intel reversed their folly
pretty quickly, adopted the x86-64
Architecturally, it's a nasty kludge. As far as stability on FreeBSD is
concerned, my only machine under PAE with 4 GB RAM (without PAE it would
use a bit over 3 GB) is very solid on 6-STABLE.
To the original poster - does a PAE kernel actually boot on your
16 gig machines ? My problem was
Thank you all for your suggestions. I have been trying to push to move to amd64
architecture for all the reasons you all stated. For the record, we tested PAE
on one machine, booted the kernel w/ nextboot and it crashed about 15 minutes
later. I will consider configuring a dump device to
David Naylor wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
What is the exact CFLAGS setting that you use?
Do you use -O2 (or -Os) without -fno-strict-aliasing?
I have managed to isolate the problem and it is definitely tmpfs
related. If the directory that I'm installing into is tmpfs then it
will
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
The dmesg buffer is a circular buffer containing both
kernel output and console output. However, dmesg
displays only the kernel output. If there was lots of
console output, it filled all of the dmesg buffer,
so dmesg displays nothing
On Feb 19, 2008 5:10 PM, Kevin K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a box that we recently installed 16GB of RAM on. The box is i386
FreeBSD 6.2. It only recognizes 4gb.
Siding with most of the group (go amd64), I'll add my own comment:
Using PAE to access 4G of RAM (because 4G shows up as
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:29 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE amd64
Running sysinstall for post-installation configuration of sorts in
xterm/konsole/gnome-terminal.
Hmm your $TERM environmental variable is set to vt100? vt200? wscons?
~BAS
Very strange issue: arrow keys work
* Tom Samplonius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080219 23:00] wrote:
- Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any alternative solutions that would provide a
more
reliable environment other than PAE?
Besideds PAE some people have mentioned running an amd64 system.
on 20/02/2008 20:45 Brian A. Seklecki said the following:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:29 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE amd64
Running sysinstall for post-installation configuration of sorts in
xterm/konsole/gnome-terminal.
Hmm your $TERM environmental variable is set to
Hi,
Since i've updated my machine to FreeBSD 6.3 some process randomly start
using 100% CPU or are locked to STOP state (in top).
Is there a known solution / patch ? Except the rollback :)
Regards,
Gil
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Gil Bidon wrote:
Hi,
Since i've updated my machine to FreeBSD 6.3 some process randomly start
using 100% CPU or are locked to STOP state (in top).
Is there a known solution / patch ? Except the rollback :)
You need to tell us more information. What processes are they?
Kris
Gil Bidon wrote:
Hi,
Since i've updated my machine to FreeBSD 6.3 some process randomly start
using 100% CPU or are locked to STOP state (in top).
Is there a known solution / patch ? Except the rollback :)
Regards,
Gil
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 23:11 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/02/2008 20:45 Brian A. Seklecki said the following:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:29 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE amd64
Running sysinstall for post-installation configuration of sorts in
17 matches
Mail list logo
