Just for the record, I think the problem is that DEVLOAD only looks for
block devices and will overwrite existing CDS entries if there is no
associated block device. Which is the wrong thing to do.
Regards,
Christian
--
Op 1-8-2011 15:29, c...@bttr-software.de schreef:
Just for the record, I think the problem is that DEVLOAD only looks for
block devices and will overwrite existing CDS entries if there is no
associated block device. Which is the wrong thing to do.
I hope there's a remedy to this, if this is
Op 30-7-2011 15:29, dos386 schreef:
Got the answer ???
- LZMA decompressible on 8086: YES
- LZMA vs NRV/UCL: LZMA (much?) slower decompression
- Ultra-Brutal-Effect: much slower compression,
no performance penalty on decompression (?)
I did a quick test here by looking if UPX
I hope there's a remedy to this, if this is the case.
Yes; patch DEVLOAD (or get someone to do it).
I'd have to find other .SYS block device
drivers to see how they behave under DEVLOAD, and other device driver
loaders like Creative's CTLOAD and whichever program it was that QEMM had.
On 8/1/2011 7:31 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Op 30-7-2011 15:29, dos386 schreef:
Got the answer ???
- LZMA decompressible on 8086: YES
- LZMA vs NRV/UCL: LZMA (much?) slower decompression
- Ultra-Brutal-Effect: much slower compression,
no performance penalty on decompression (?)
I did a
Hi,
Here it is (w/ srcs and one-byte diff):
https://sites.google.com/site/rugxulo/XFDISK.ZIP?attredirects=0d=1
Nice size for a patch ;-)
As for UPX terms, I could try LZMA and Ultra Brute settings indeed,
but
wonder what effect (decompression possible at all? loading times?
memory
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Michael B. Brutman
mbbrut...@brutman.com wrote:
On 8/1/2011 7:31 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Op 30-7-2011 15:29, dos386 schreef:
Got the answer ???
- LZMA decompressible on 8086: YES
- LZMA vs NRV/UCL: LZMA (much?) slower decompression
- Ultra-Brutal-Effect:
Hi!
There was a question about the which of the algorithms (LZMA, NRV,
UCL)
is safe for GPL software. A quick review of the UPX web site did not
give me a clear answer on which one was used when I specified -9
--8086 for options. Does anybody know off the top of their heads?
I
