It is really not a big change from classes. If you already have objects,
often all you have to change is that you return them. Object-oriented
languages implicitly have the notion of the object as a first argument, so
you've got a container to work with. The job of higher level code is to
FWIW: I’ve been programming and teaching in R for quite a while, and have
recently started working in Elixir (based on the Erlang virtual machine and
process model) for web application development. The two languages have
application spaces that are quite distinct.
. . . Bob
> On Aug 11, 2017,
Jenny mentioned Arrival of the Fittest. I will condense a set of
notes that I am sending Jenny about the book and will post the
condensed version to the list. I think it could resolve a lot of this
'random' issue.
davew
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> Steve,
>
>
Nick -
I am very glad to note that you are recovering and your scrappiness is
properly returning!
*/[NST==>The best cardio rehab is for you-guys to keep annoying me.
Thanks for that. <==nst] /*
You might check with your cardiologist on this one, I'm not sure a rise
in BP is the same as
Steve,
Thanks for staying with me on this.
To be honest, I have never encountered anybody who believed that natural
selection alone is capable of producing evolution, unless it was somebody
who includes some variation-generating mechanism within the notion of
natural selection. I have
I know, I know, functional programming is as fun as hitting your head with
a brick.
But this article does a nice job of showing how functional programming is
very Self-like:
https://me
dium.com/@kentcdodds/classes-complexity-and-functional-programming-a8dd86903747
It's objects and
Can't resist. I've been in love with functional programming for years. I
teach an introductory Haskell class. My goal is to get students to think at
a higher level that functional programming facilitates.
P.S. The link in Owen's message wasn't created properly. Here's a
correction:
Merle: thanks!
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Merle Lefkoff
wrote:
> Well, yes, Owen. I was contacted recently by a group of South and North
> Korean women who have been meeting secretly in the DMZ. The North Koreans
> sent their delegation. It's a really
Interesting timing. Although I don't do much software development these
days, I've been fiddling around with Clojure off and on for the last few
years. I conceptually like the ideas behind it, but it takes immutability
to more of an extreme than I feel is necessary (e.g. unless you use its
"I conceptually like the ideas behind it, but it takes immutability to more of
an extreme than I feel is necessary (e.g. unless you use its software
transactional memory constructs, there is no way to re-bind a local variable)."
In Haskell, if this is needed, one uses the State Monad.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Marcus Daniels
wrote:
> "I know, I know, functional programming is as fun as hitting your head
>> with a brick."
>
> It is fun!
>
That's great to hear, too much is NOT fun in programming!
> If I have a project that isn't FP, I make it
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-4780962/How-Game-Thrones-taking-years-graying-Santa-Fe.html
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)505.473.9646(h)
Society
Nick -
... continued
What is presented to the world by the epigenetic system is not
mutations but “hypotheses” about ways to live. And presumably
epigenetic systems are shaped by natural selection to produce
more or less plausible hypotheses.
And what is the "hypothesis
Owen writes:
"OK, so in the JavaScript world, how does one inch forward toward functional? I
don't want to be so functional as some of the extremes. Curring all the way to
one arg functions?"
I'm not sure what properties of JavaScript you care about. If it is just the
operational part of
"I know, I know, functional programming is as fun as hitting your head with a
brick."
It is fun!
"It is a bit scary letting go of "central control" Classes provide, very human.
I mean, who's *boss*?"
The caller is the boss. With FP you know that arguments are all read-only.
This gives
There's an iPhone app for that, but here's a map. About 3/4 eclipse in Santa
Fe.
https://eclipse2017.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NASA_map_508.pdf
From: Friam on behalf of Gillian Densmore
Is New Mexico getting left out of the awsome that is the Eclips coming up?
Or are the their places to to (try to) get to watch it?
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to
17 matches
Mail list logo