Condition Visible does not seem to work when xcompmgr is running.

2007-07-02 Thread Michał Kazior

Hello,

I posted about this issue on the fvwm forum at fvwm.lair.be and got
redirected here.

I would like to auto-iconify windows that are not visible on the
screen anymore (i.e. the got totally overlapped by other windows).
However the following code, does not work when xcompmgr is running at
the same time:
--begin--
  All (CurrentPage, !Visible) Iconify True
--end--
I have also tried running xcompmgr with different arguments, but with
no effect.

The Visible condition works perfectly if xcompmgr is not running
though. I do not know if it is FVWM or xcompmgr that is at fault.

I use fvwm 2.5.21 (with support for: ReadLine, Stroke, XPM, PNG,
Shape, XShm, SM, Bidi text, Xinerama, XRender, XFT, NLS), xorg-server
1.3.0.


Regards,
Michał Kazior.


Re: Condition Visible does not seem to work when xcompmgr is running.

2007-07-02 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:52:46PM +0200, Micha?? Kazior wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I posted about this issue on the fvwm forum at fvwm.lair.be and got
 redirected here.
 
 I would like to auto-iconify windows that are not visible on the
 screen anymore (i.e. the got totally overlapped by other windows).
 However the following code, does not work when xcompmgr is running at
 the same time:
 --begin--
   All (CurrentPage, !Visible) Iconify True
 --end--
 I have also tried running xcompmgr with different arguments, but with
 no effect.
 
 The Visible condition works perfectly if xcompmgr is not running
 though. I do not know if it is FVWM or xcompmgr that is at fault.

I can only guess that xcompmgr suppresses VisibilityNotify events
for windows.

 I use fvwm 2.5.21 (with support for: ReadLine, Stroke, XPM, PNG,
 Shape, XShm, SM, Bidi text, Xinerama, XRender, XFT, NLS), xorg-server
 1.3.0.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

 --
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Condition Visible does not seem to work when xcompmgr is running.

2007-07-02 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 02Jul2007 22:32, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|  The Visible condition works perfectly if xcompmgr is not running
|  though. I do not know if it is FVWM or xcompmgr that is at fault.
| 
| I can only guess that xcompmgr suppresses VisibilityNotify events
| for windows.

I expect the behind windows are Visible because they are needed for
transparency - alpha compositing will require the window to maintain its
entire surface as though it were on top.
-- 
Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

Hello, my name is Yog-Sothoth, and I'll be your eldritch horror today.
- Heather Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FVWM: Gnome panel logout button

2007-07-02 Thread Chris Debenham
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 12:03 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
 Am 30.06.2007 22:14 schrieb Thomas Adam:
  On 30/06/07, Harald Kirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There is but one thing that does not work. The panel can be configure to
  have this big red Log off button. When I press it, it seems that only
  the panel exits.
  
  Because you haven't told FVWM (or rather the GNOME framework0 that the
  specified window manager needs to run under a session manager.
 
 Hmm, how would I do so? In the ubuntu gdm start screen I only selected
 FVWM instead of GNOME session and when I look at the output of ps, I find
 
 /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/bin/dbus-launch --exit-with-session fvwm
 
 So what would be necessary to get the red log-off button on the
 gnome-panel working with fvwm?

You need to replace it with a launcher that runs FvwmCommand Quit
You'll also need to ensure that Module FvwmCommandS is started at
init.


 
 Thanks,
 Harald.
 
 
 PS: Apart from crippled metacity, one reason to go back to fvwm after
 starting to use gnome, was the braindead session stuff: log out and then
 in again and be surprised which applications are started. There was some
 correlation with what I left running when closing X, but only some.
 Consequently I am not sure if I want any session-business at all.
 
-- 
There's No Future In Time Travel.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: FVWM: Gnome panel logout button

2007-07-02 Thread David Vilar
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 04:32:50PM +1000, Chris Debenham wrote:
 On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 12:03 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
  Am 30.06.2007 22:14 schrieb Thomas Adam:
   On 30/06/07, Harald Kirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   There is but one thing that does not work. The panel can be configure to
   have this big red Log off button. When I press it, it seems that only
   the panel exits.
   
   Because you haven't told FVWM (or rather the GNOME framework0 that the
   specified window manager needs to run under a session manager.
  
  Hmm, how would I do so? In the ubuntu gdm start screen I only selected
  FVWM instead of GNOME session and when I look at the output of ps, I find
  
  /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/bin/dbus-launch --exit-with-session fvwm
  
  So what would be necessary to get the red log-off button on the
  gnome-panel working with fvwm?
 
 You need to replace it with a launcher that runs FvwmCommand Quit
 You'll also need to ensure that Module FvwmCommandS is started at
 init.

Or you can start fvwm as the window manager of gnome. You can achieve
that by:

1. Starting gnome (i.e. selecting gnome in the gdm screen)
2. Issuing a 'fvwm --replace' in a terminal 
3. Saving the gnome session (Sorry, I don't remember where this option
was, somewhere in the gnome configuration options).

You can also deactivate the automatic session saving stuff and other
annoying things of gnome. For me this works quite well.

BTW, what does the option '--sm-disable' do?

Cheers,

David

-- 
David Vilar Torres  RWTH Aachen
Tel: (+49) 241 80 21611 Lehrstuhl f. Informatik 6
Fax: (+49) 241 80 22219 Ahornstr. 55
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   D-52056 Aachen (Germany)



Re: FVWM: Gnome panel logout button

2007-07-02 Thread Harald Kirsch


Am 02.07.2007 10:47 schrieb David Vilar:
 BTW, what does the option '--sm-disable' do?

To be honest, I have no clue. This is a relict of my first attempts to
get some gnome services, like the gnome-panel, to work under fvwm. The
manual says Disable connection to session manager. And since I think
this session manager thing is merely trying to be helpful rathern than
being helpful, I thought to keep it as uninformed as possible.-)

Cheers,
Harald.

-- 
--+-
Harald Kirsch | pifpafpuf bei gmx punkt de



Re: FVWM: fvwm-snap-20070624: make install fails without --enable-html

2007-07-02 Thread Dan Espen
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Hi folks,
 
 I had already sent this to fvwm-workers, but without luck. Anybody
 reading this list?

Lots of people are reading this list.
Patches get applied but most of people with commit priviledges
seem to be busy lately.  I know I am.  Be patient.

-- 
Dan Espen   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FVWM: Gnome panel logout button

2007-07-02 Thread Dan Espen
Harald Kirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
 Am 02.07.2007 10:47 schrieb David Vilar:
  BTW, what does the option '--sm-disable' do?
 
 To be honest, I have no clue. This is a relict of my first attempts to
 get some gnome services, like the gnome-panel, to work under fvwm. The
 manual says Disable connection to session manager. And since I think
 this session manager thing is merely trying to be helpful rathern than
 being helpful, I thought to keep it as uninformed as possible.-)

The session manager remembers applications you were running
when you shut down and restarts them when you start up.

Not something I would use.

-- 
Dan Espen   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FVWM: Gnome panel logout button

2007-07-02 Thread Harald Kirsch


Am 02.07.2007 16:41 schrieb Thomas Adam:
 Needs updating a tad, but:
 
 http://linuxgazette.net/100/adam.html

Nice article. To cite: Session management allows the state of
applications that are running to be saved and remembered.

So that the computer behaves like my desk. If I leave the room and come
back later, it is in the same mess as I left it.-(

This is certainly a matter of taste, but I personally don't like this
ideas. I want to define the initial setup of applications explicitely
(StartFunction) and don't want just any odd incoherent state be resurrected.

Viele Grüße,
Harald.

-- 
--+-
Harald Kirsch | pifpafpuf bei gmx punkt de