Hi Dominik,
* There is lots of markup in the examples which should not be
there (commands and command options).
It conveys extra information (about what is a builtin command). I
consider it an improvement, but I can remove it if you feel strongly
about it.
* All section headers look the
Hi Dominik,
If you do not want to produce this documentation please use:
./configure --disable-htmldoc
As the process take four times longer than building the
executables, may I suggest that
a) the html pages are not built unless you specifically ask for
them,
Ok. I will
Hi Dan,
Just woke up and had to try this...
That's the kind of enthusiasm I like! :)
When it got to the docs, it started printing this warning:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dane/src/fvwm/build_fvwm2_5_20/doc/fvwm'
Generating authors.html
../../../fvwm2_5_20/doc/fvwm/authors.xml:6:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 09:57:58AM +1100, Scott Smedley wrote:
Hi Dominik,
If you do not want to produce this documentation please use:
./configure --disable-htmldoc
As the process take four times longer than building the
executables, may I suggest that
a) the html pages
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're not talking about source but documentation. In my eyes
having split pages is the one feature in html docs that makes it
completely unusable: you can not browse or search it in a
sensible way. And it's hell to read. A single page with intra-
Hi Dan,
I think the key is that I build from OUTSIDE the source dir.
I still get the same problems.
You are correct - fixed now.
Thanks,
Scott. :)
Hi Dominik,
The current
state of the XML documentation prevents me from writing any
documentation. As almost everything I do has to be documented, it
prevents me to do almost anything.
I understand your concerns about the man-page output not being
rendered perfectly I'll endeavour to fix