Hi folks,
Sorry for the delay.
seventh guardian wrote:
On 9/4/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we really do not use implib I'm all for removing the
test. It's causing endless troubles for me.
Ok, done.
It's strange, but it seems that the imlib test macro was realy never
On 9/4/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
I see your point, and I agree that things may not be working
correctly. But what you did is a hack. You just changed the test
program to detect imlib when it is not there.
Even if it works that way, it should be done
On 9/4/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seventh guardian wrote:
I see your point, and I agree that things may not be working
correctly. But what you did is a hack. You just changed the test
program to detect imlib when it
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of course I haven't tried all different Linux distros. but
for Debian Etch I have to apply the appended patch to make
detecting gdk-imlib11 work. imlib11 (without gdk-)
does not seem to be necessary. Imlib.h doesn't appear
anywhere in
Hi Renato,
seventh guardian wrote:
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of course I haven't tried all different Linux distros. but
for Debian Etch I have to apply the appended patch to make
detecting gdk-imlib11 work. imlib11 (without gdk-)
does not seem to be
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Renato,
seventh guardian wrote:
On 9/3/06, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Of course I haven't tried all different Linux distros. but
for Debian Etch I have to apply the appended patch to make
detecting gdk-imlib11
seventh guardian wrote:
I see your point, and I agree that things may not be working
correctly. But what you did is a hack. You just changed the test
program to detect imlib when it is not there.
Even if it works that way, it should be done properly. Probably a
cleanup would be good..
