Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-08 Thread Martin Cermak
On Thu 2016-09-08 08:04 , Donald R Laster Jr wrote: > I use it on Slackware, where it is part of the distribution, > and RHEL where I have to install it. It's in EPEL, so it's kind of part of the RHEL/CENTOS distro too: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-07 Thread Ron Tapia
your thumb. On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, Robert Crochelt wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:48:03 -0600 From: Robert Crochelt <bob99...@yahoo.com> To: Bob Marcan <bob.mar...@gmail.com> Cc: gi1242+f...@gmail.com, fvwm@fvwm.org Subject: Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition Totally agree. My favorite wm of

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-06 Thread John Wiggins
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:27 AM, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Werner Scheinast wrote: > >> FVWM has shrunk down to a - as you call it - crackpot project. Only few >> people are using it, these are mainly old guys like me (I'm 45) who know > > Well

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-06 Thread gi1242+fvwm
Apologies for "hijacking" this thread; I love fvwm and use it every day. I have to confess that a small part of me fears that because of a silly protocol change, fvwm may suddenly "not work", and the fvwm dev(s) might no longer be interested... Regardless, let me also add my BIG THANK YOU to the

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-06 Thread Werner Scheinast
Heute schrieb Thomas Adam: > I have no idea why some people hijacked this thread with ridiculous statements > of ensuring FVWM doesn't disappear, etc. It's on Github along with all the > other crackpot projects... Dear Thomas, FVWM has shrunk down to a - as you call it - crackpot project. Only

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-06 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:50:36PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > Hi all, > > I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered > if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the > early 2000s. Is it time for an update? > > If so, send some

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-02 Thread Michael Großer
Me too. As long as nobody takes the functionality away from FVWM, the logo doesn't matter. - Michael - Robert Crochelt wrote: > Totally agree. My favorite wm of all time. > Bob Crochelt > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 1, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Bob Marcan wrote: >> >>

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-01 Thread Thomas Adam
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote: > While searching for a link to this xpm, I discovered that debians > control file of package fvwm-icons mentions an upstream source which is > nowadays 404 [0]. What happend to fvwm-icons? I dropped it from FVWM since it wasn't

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-01 Thread Tethys
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered > if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the > early 2000s. Is it time for an update? Personally, I'd say no.

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-01 Thread gi1242+fvwm
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Martin Cermak wrote: > I like the current logo. But as long as fvwm is here as such, I'm > fine with pretty much any logo for it ;) Ditto; The logo can be a green polka dotted rabbit if you fancy. Just as long as fvwm doesn't disappear... GI -- TEN

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-09-01 Thread Martin Cermak
Hi Thomas, On Mon 2016-08-29 21:50 , Thomas Adam wrote: > Hi all, > > I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered > if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the > early 2000s. Is it time for an update? > > If so, send some

Re: FVWM: FVWM Logo Competition

2016-08-31 Thread doark
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 21:50:36 wrote: > Hi all, > > I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and > wondered if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition > was held in the early 2000s. Is it time for an update? > > If so, send some ideas