2. Tie-breaking rule
I chose to break ties by rewarding the first to post.
I suppose other ways are possible (e.g. reward the more
efficient one) but they all seem a little artificial.
This seems fair to me. First
Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it is still fresh in everyone's minds, I thought I should
make some notes on possible improvements for the next apocalypse.
1. Timing
We
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:44:47PM -,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
McGlinchy, Alistair would like to recall the message, Possible improvements
for the next golf apocalypse.
It's mail, Jim, but not as we know it.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:31:06PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I suggest that in future games the Arbiter should reveal
the leading scores for each hole about 4-8 hours from the end.
This should make the final hours quite exciting.
I think that 4-8 hours is too short,
Piers Cawley wrote:
I think a weekend would be fine (i.e. 2 non-working days)
I don't. I don't tend to do much coding on the weekend, but I do quite
a bit in the evening and on the train during the week. And I think
This is very personal, I don't have much free time during the (working)
En réponse à Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It might be nice to see a Judge's Prize for the solution that the
judge liked best. It doesn't even have to be the shortest. (It doesn't
even have to qualify, given how much -p 11.. tickled the judge this
time 'round)
Yes, the Judge's Prize could
Hi All,
[Oops apologies for 1/2 message sent before. Memo to self: never Alt-Tab
with your right hand, :-) ]
2. Tie-breaking rule
I chose to break ties by rewarding the first to post.
I suppose other ways are possible (e.g. reward the more
efficient one) but they all seem a little
BooK [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
En réponse à Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It might be nice to see a Judge's Prize for the solution that the
judge liked best. It doesn't even have to be the shortest. (It doesn't
even have to qualify, given how much -p 11.. tickled the judge this
time
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 04:36:26PM +0100, BooK wrote:
En réponse à [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IMHO a solution to a good hole should be in the 50-70 char region. That way
there's more scope for styling the response. Such styling could
include:
- the least number of /a-z/i chars.
- the
BG == Brad Greenlee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BG Or why not have a web page to which golfers would post their programs (just
BG paste them in to a text field). The test program could run right then and
BG update the scores. The arbiter would have admin access to go in and muck
BG around
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:07:15AM -0600, Nicholson, Dale wrote:
Santa is nothing more than a perversion added later.
Or a shortened name for Saint Nicholas, a Saint of the Catholic church.
The choice is yours.
--
There seems no plan because it is all plan.
-- C.S. Lewis
PC == Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PC Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AS == Andrew Savige [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AS 1. Timing
you started it just as i was leaving for LISA. :( i should be around
for the next one. just don't do one around the time of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
