The following proposed patch for stable 3.1, updates the man page for
gmond.conf to fix some typos, grammatical errors and changes slightly
the wording in some paragraphs to improve readability but does no
syntactic changes, and eventhough some empty lines were deleted, none of
them was expected
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Ulf wrote:
Hi,
I' ve tried gmond 3.1.0.1530.
No fix or workaround for this has been committed for 3.1 yet, and I had been
able to easily reproduce the problem.
Sadly, it seems it is a known issue that has no fix yet
But still the same problem.
#
Hi,
I just modified the README.AIX.
Maybe that fits your needs.
I haven' t tested the original AIX C compiler, but I' m pretty sure that the
original compiler will not work.
Additional documentation update.
Maybe you should write to the documentation how to calculate the RRAs
default stepping =
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:41:46AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During an upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1, is it permissable to mix 3.0 and 3.1
gmond nodes?
this was meant to be somewhere in the documentation..
no, they are not compatible and can't be in the same used in the same cluster
(sharing
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Ulf wrote:
Hi,
I just modified the README.AIX.
Maybe that fits your needs.
thanks, Committed revision 1546 for trunk and proposed to backport for 3.1
I haven' t tested the original AIX C compiler, but I' m pretty sure that the
original compiler
On 7/9/2008 at 3:56 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following proposed patch for stable 3.1, updates the man page for
gmond.conf to fix some typos, grammatical errors and changes slightly
the wording in some paragraphs to improve
Hi Daniel:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During an upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1, is it permissable to mix 3.0 and 3.1
gmond nodes?
Any recommendations about the order in which to do the upgrade?
Will the 3.1 gmetad accept data from 3.0 gmond agents? If so, would it
Hi Daniel:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How scalable is gmetad meant to be? How many nodes and/or metrics based
on the assumption that samples are to be taken very frequently,
typically less than 10 seconds apart?
Has anyone reached any limitations in terms of
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:49:48AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
+1
Committed revision 1550.
Carlo
-
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open
